Literature DB >> 21835298

The prognostic value of the heart rate response to adenosine in relation to diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.

Fadi G Hage1, Phillip Dean, Vikas Bhatia, Fahad Iqbal, Jaekyeong Heo, Ami E Iskandrian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a useful method for risk assessment in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), but these patients have a residual risk that is not accounted for by MPI. The objective of this study is to determine whether the heart rate response (HRR) to adenosine has an incremental prognostic value to MPI in high-risk patients.
METHODS: The study group included 879 (age 61 ± 13 years, 48% women, 58% white, 40% DM, 49% CKD) consecutive patients who underwent adenosine MPI. Chronic kidney disease was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) or dialysis replacement therapy. An HRR <10% (change from baseline) was considered blunted. The outcome of interest was overall mortality.
RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 40 ± 14 months, 212 patients (24%) died. Patients with DM (23.4% ± 16.3% vs 29.4% ± 21.4%, P < .0001) and CKD (22.7% ± 17.6% vs 30.5% ± 20.4%, P < .0001) had lower HRR as compared with patients without DM and CKD, respectively. A blunted HRR was associated with increased mortality in the overall population and in those with DM and CKD and helped in risk stratification when added to traditional MPI findings. In a Cox regression model, a blunted HRR was the strongest predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 2.8, P < .0001) and provided additional prognostic data to MPI (hazard ratio 1.9, P < .0001) after controlling for age, gender, race, history of myocardial infarction, DM, CKD, β-blocker use, and presence of chest pain.
CONCLUSIONS: A blunted HRR to adenosine is an independent predictor of poor outcome, adds incremental value to MPI, and helps in better risk stratification in high-risk patient groups.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835298     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  27 in total

1.  The effect of caffeine on adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging: time to reassess?

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Heart rate response to regadenoson: Making the case for its value in clinical practice.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging performed pre-renal transplantation: post-transplantation follow-up and outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher W Ives; Wael A AlJaroudi; Vineeta Kumar; Ayman Farag; Dana V Rizk; Suzanne Oparil; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Cardiovascular imaging in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Risk assessment in the era of high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ankur Gupta; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Use of regadenoson in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage; Jaekyeong Heo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Punitha Arasaratnam; Masoud Sadreddini; Yeung Yam; Vinay Kansal; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli; Rob S Beanlands; Michael E Merhige; Brent A Williams; Emir Veledar; James K Min; Li Chen; Terrence D Ruddy; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Leslee J Shaw; Benjamin J W Chow
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Regadenoson: a focused update.

Authors:  Gopal Ghimire; Fadi G Hage; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.