Literature DB >> 18751688

Egocentric and allocentric localization during induced motion.

Robert B Post1, Robert B Welch, David Whitney.   

Abstract

This research examined motor measures of the apparent egocentric location and perceptual measures of the apparent allocentric location of a target that was being seen to undergo induced motion (IM). In Experiments 1 and 3, subjects fixated a stationary dot (IM target) while a rectangular surround stimulus (inducing stimulus) oscillated horizontally. The inducing stimulus motion caused the IM target to appear to move in the opposite direction. In Experiment 1, two dots (flashed targets) were flashed above and below the IM target when the surround had reached its leftmost or rightmost displacement from the subject's midline. Subjects pointed open-loop at either the apparent egocentric location of the IM target or at the bottom of the two flashed targets. On separate trials, subjects made judgments of the Vernier alignment of the IM target with the flashed targets at the endpoints of the surround's oscillation. The pointing responses were displaced in the direction of the previously seen IM for the IM target and to a lesser degree for the bottom flashed target. However, the allocentric Vernier judgments demonstrated no perceptual displacement of the IM target relative to the flashed targets. Thus, IM results in a dissociation of egocentric location measures from allocentric location measures. In Experiment 2, pointing and Vernier measures were obtained with stationary horizontally displaced surrounds and there was no dissociation of egocentric location measures from allocentric location measures. These results indicate that the Roelofs effect did not produce the pattern of results in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, pointing and Vernier measures were obtained when the surround was at the midpoint of an oscillation. In this case, egocentric pointing responses were displaced in the direction of surround motion (opposite IM) for the IM target and to a greater degree for the bottom flashed target. However, there was no apparent displacement of the IM target relative to the flashed targets in the allocentric Vernier judgments. Therefore, in Experiment 3 egocentric location measures were again dissociated from allocentric location measures. The results of this experiment also demonstrate that IM does not generate an allocentric displacement illusion analogous to the "flash-lag" effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18751688      PMCID: PMC2652014          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1550-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  The onset repulsion effect.

Authors:  Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2002

2.  The induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame?

Authors:  Paul Dassonville; Bruce Bridgeman; Jagdeep Kaur Bala; Paul Thiem; Anthony Sampanes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead?

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The effect of a moving background on aimed hand movements.

Authors:  H Mohrmann-Lendla; A G Fleischer
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Studies of open-loop pointing in the presence of induced motion.

Authors:  Robert B Post; Robert B Welch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-08

6.  Spatiotemporal tuning of rapid interactions between visual-motion analysis and reaching movement.

Authors:  Hiroaki Gomi; Naotoshi Abekawa; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Probing the time course of representational momentum.

Authors:  J J Freyd; J Q Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Different frames of reference for position and motion.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1994-01

10.  Motion extrapolation in catching.

Authors:  R Nijhawan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spatial localization investigated by continuous pointing during visual and gravitoinertial changes.

Authors:  C Scotto Di Cesare; L Bringoux; C Bourdin; F R Sarlegna; D R Mestre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Paradoxical stabilization of relative position in moving frames.

Authors:  Mert Özkan; Stuart Anstis; Bernard M 't Hart; Mark Wexler; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.