Wei Zha1, David J Niles1, Stanley J Kruger1, Bernard J Dardzinski2, Robert V Cadman1, David G Mummy3, Scott K Nagle4, Sean B Fain5. 1. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI. 2. Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1550 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI. 4. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI; Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 5. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1550 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI. Electronic address: sfain@wisc.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the performance of a semiautomated ventilation defect segmentation approach, adaptive K-means, with manual segmentation of hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six subjects with EIB underwent hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance imaging and spirometry tests at baseline, post exercise, and recovery over two separate visits. Ventilation defects were analyzed by two methods. First, two independent readers manually segmented ventilation defects. Second, defects were quantified by an adaptive K-means method that corrected for coil sensitivity, applied a vesselness filter to estimate pulmonary vasculature, and segmented defects adaptively based on the overall low-intensity signals in the lungs. These two methods were then compared in four aspects: (1) ventilation defect percent (VDP) measurements, (2) correlation between spirometric measures and measured VDP, (3) regional VDP variations pre- and post exercise challenge, and (4) Dice coefficient for spatial agreement. RESULTS: The adaptive K-means method was ~5 times faster, and the measured VDP bias was under 2%. The correlation between predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second over forced vital capacity and VDP measured by adaptive K-means (ρ = -0.64, P <0.0001) and by the manual method (ρ = -0.63, P <0.0001) yielded almost identical 95% confidence intervals. Neither method of measuring VDP indicated apical/basal or anterior dependence in this small study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the manual method, the adaptive K-means method provided faster, reproducible, comparable measures of VDP in EIB and may be applied to a variety of lung diseases.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the performance of a semiautomated ventilation defect segmentation approach, adaptive K-means, with manual segmentation of hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six subjects with EIB underwent hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance imaging and spirometry tests at baseline, post exercise, and recovery over two separate visits. Ventilation defects were analyzed by two methods. First, two independent readers manually segmented ventilation defects. Second, defects were quantified by an adaptive K-means method that corrected for coil sensitivity, applied a vesselness filter to estimate pulmonary vasculature, and segmented defects adaptively based on the overall low-intensity signals in the lungs. These two methods were then compared in four aspects: (1) ventilation defect percent (VDP) measurements, (2) correlation between spirometric measures and measured VDP, (3) regional VDP variations pre- and post exercise challenge, and (4) Dice coefficient for spatial agreement. RESULTS: The adaptive K-means method was ~5 times faster, and the measured VDP bias was under 2%. The correlation between predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second over forced vital capacity and VDP measured by adaptive K-means (ρ = -0.64, P <0.0001) and by the manual method (ρ = -0.63, P <0.0001) yielded almost identical 95% confidence intervals. Neither method of measuring VDP indicated apical/basal or anterior dependence in this small study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the manual method, the adaptive K-means method provided faster, reproducible, comparable measures of VDP in EIB and may be applied to a variety of lung diseases.
Authors: Edwin J R van Beek; Catherine Hill; Neil Woodhouse; Stanislao Fichele; Sally Fleming; Bridget Howe; Sandra Bott; Jim M Wild; Christopher J Taylor Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Miranda Kirby; Mohammadreza Heydarian; Sarah Svenningsen; Andrew Wheatley; David G McCormack; Roya Etemad-Rezai; Grace Parraga Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Stanley J Kruger; David J Niles; Bernard Dardzinski; Amy Harman; Nizar N Jarjour; Marcella Ruddy; Scott K Nagle; Christopher J Francois; Ronald L Sorkness; Ryan M Burton; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; Sean B Fain Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: David J Niles; Stanley J Kruger; Bernard J Dardzinski; Amy Harman; Nizar N Jarjour; Marcella Ruddy; Scott K Nagle; Christopher J François; Sean B Fain Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Eduard E de Lange; Talissa A Altes; James T Patrie; John J Battiston; Adam P Juersivich; John P Mugler; Thomas A Platts-Mills Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marcus J Couch; Robert Thomen; Nikhil Kanhere; Raymond Hu; Felix Ratjen; Jason Woods; Giles Santyr Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Wei Zha; Sean B Fain; Mark L Schiebler; Michael D Evans; Scott K Nagle; Fang Liu Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Lukas Ebner; Jeff Kammerman; Bastiaan Driehuys; Mark L Schiebler; Robert V Cadman; Sean B Fain Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: David J Roach; Matthew M Willmering; Joseph W Plummer; Laura L Walkup; Yin Zhang; Md Monir Hossain; Zackary I Cleveland; Jason C Woods Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2021-08-12 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Wei Zha; Stanley J Kruger; Robert V Cadman; David G Mummy; Michael D Evans; Scott K Nagle; Loren C Denlinger; Nizar N Jarjour; Ronald L Sorkness; Sean B Fain Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Paul J C Hughes; Laurie Smith; Ho-Fung Chan; Bilal A Tahir; Graham Norquay; Guilhem J Collier; Alberto Biancardi; Helen Marshall; Jim M Wild Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2018-11-09
Authors: Wei Zha; Stanley J Kruger; Kevin M Johnson; Robert V Cadman; Laura C Bell; Fang Liu; Andrew D Hahn; Michael D Evans; Scott K Nagle; Sean B Fain Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 4.813