Marcus Ang1, Yuqiang Soh2, Hla Myint Htoon3, Jodhbir S Mehta4, Donald Tan5. 1. Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Republic of Singapore. 2. Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Republic of Singapore. 3. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Republic of Singapore. 4. Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Republic of Singapore. Electronic address: jodmehta@gmail.com. 5. Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health System, Singapore, Republic of Singapore. Electronic address: donald.tan.t.h@singhealth.com.sg.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare 5-year graft survival after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in Asian eyes. DESIGN: Prospective, nested, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients who underwent DSAEK (423 eyes) or PK (405 eyes) for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED) or bullous keratopathy (BK). METHODS: Clinical data and donor and recipient characteristics were recorded from our prospective cohort from the Singapore Corneal Transplant Registry. All surgeries were performed by the corneal surgeons at our center, which included cases performed or partially performed by corneal fellows in training under direct supervision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five-year cumulative graft survival. RESULTS: Overall mean age was 67.8±9.8 years, and 50.1% of patients were men. There were no significant differences in age (P = 0.261) or gender (P = 0.78) between PK and DSAEK groups in our predominantly Chinese (76.6%) Asian cohort, with more BK compared with FED (68.1% vs. 31.9%; P < 0.001). Overall 5-year graft survival was superior for DSAEK compared with PK (79.4% vs. 66.5%; P < 0.001, log-rank test). Median 5-year percent endothelial cell density loss was significantly greater in PK compared with DSAEK (60.9% vs. 48.7%; P = 0.007). Cox regression analysis revealed that BK was a significant factor associated with graft failure (hazard ratio [HR], 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05-5.33; P < 0.001), and PK was more likely to fail compared with endothelial keratoplasty (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.08-2.41; P = 0.02) adjusting for confounders such as recipient age, gender, and donor factors. Five-year cumulative incidence of complications such as graft rejection (P < 0.001), epitheliopathy (P < 0.001), suture-related corneal infections (P < 0.001), and wound dehiscence (P = 0.002) were greater in the PK group compared with the DSAEK group. CONCLUSIONS: In Asian eyes from the same study cohort with standardized surgical and postoperative regimes, 5-year graft survival was superior for DSAEK compared with PK in eyes with FED and BK.
PURPOSE: To compare 5-year graft survival after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in Asian eyes. DESIGN: Prospective, nested, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients who underwent DSAEK (423 eyes) or PK (405 eyes) for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED) or bullous keratopathy (BK). METHODS: Clinical data and donor and recipient characteristics were recorded from our prospective cohort from the Singapore Corneal Transplant Registry. All surgeries were performed by the corneal surgeons at our center, which included cases performed or partially performed by corneal fellows in training under direct supervision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five-year cumulative graft survival. RESULTS: Overall mean age was 67.8±9.8 years, and 50.1% of patients were men. There were no significant differences in age (P = 0.261) or gender (P = 0.78) between PK and DSAEK groups in our predominantly Chinese (76.6%) Asian cohort, with more BK compared with FED (68.1% vs. 31.9%; P < 0.001). Overall 5-year graft survival was superior for DSAEK compared with PK (79.4% vs. 66.5%; P < 0.001, log-rank test). Median 5-year percent endothelial cell density loss was significantly greater in PK compared with DSAEK (60.9% vs. 48.7%; P = 0.007). Cox regression analysis revealed that BK was a significant factor associated with graft failure (hazard ratio [HR], 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05-5.33; P < 0.001), and PK was more likely to fail compared with endothelial keratoplasty (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.08-2.41; P = 0.02) adjusting for confounders such as recipient age, gender, and donor factors. Five-year cumulative incidence of complications such as graft rejection (P < 0.001), epitheliopathy (P < 0.001), suture-related corneal infections (P < 0.001), and wound dehiscence (P = 0.002) were greater in the PK group compared with the DSAEK group. CONCLUSIONS: In Asian eyes from the same study cohort with standardized surgical and postoperative regimes, 5-year graft survival was superior for DSAEK compared with PK in eyes with FED and BK.
Authors: Jiaxin Hu; Xiulong Shen; Frank Rigo; Thahza P Prakash; V Vinod Mootha; David R Corey Journal: Nucleic Acid Ther Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 5.486
Authors: Mark A Terry; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Thomas F Mauger; Sudeep Pramanik; George O D Rosenwasser; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Elmer Y Tu; David D Verdier; Sonia H Yoo; Jonathan H Lass Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 12.079