Literature DB >> 29921952

Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: surgical outcomes and endothelial cell count modelling from a UK centre.

Mark A P Fajgenbaum1, Nick Kopsachilis2, Emma J Hollick2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report surgical outcomes and endothelial cell density (ECD) trends up to 2 years post-operatively in the first cohort of eyes undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for low-to-moderate risk indications at our UK centre. Tight corneal sutures were used to ensure high intraoperative pressure from intracameral air for 10-min and to maintain a good post-operative air fill. Outcomes were compared to a prior series at our unit of similar eyes having Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).
METHODS: Retrospective, interventional series. Inclusions: all DMEKs with a minimum of 1-month follow-up. EXCLUSIONS: prior glaucoma surgery, penetrating keratoplasty or anterior chamber lens.
RESULTS: 88 DMEKs met inclusion. Median follow-up: 332 days. Main indication: Fuchs dystrophy (90%). COMPLICATIONS: re-bubbling 2%, primary failure 6%, retinal detachment 2%, rejection 3%. At 3 months, BCVA ≥6/6 and ≥6/9 were 67% and 86%, respectively. Graft survival at both 1 and 2 years was 94 ± 2%. Mean(±SD) cell-loss at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months: 30 ± 15%, 29 ± 16%, 33 ± 17%, 35 ± 17% and 48 ± 16%, respectively. Compared to a prior series at our unit of 210 low-to-moderate risk DSEKs, cell loss was lower for DMEK at all time-points (p < 0.001) through to 12 months but was not statistically different at 24 months. Mixed-modelling of ECD over time demonstrated the convergence of DMEK and DSEK curves by 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: DMEK using tissue from UK eye-banks resulted in high survival and excellent visual acuity. ECD through 1 year was superior to DSEK in a similar cohort. Our low re-bubble rate (2%) may be attributable to use of intracameral air at temporarily elevated intraocular pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29921952      PMCID: PMC6189189          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0152-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  27 in total

1.  Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Kelly M Fairchild; David A Price; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Isabel Dapena; Kyros Moutsouris; Konstantinos Droutsas; Lisanne Ham; Korine van Dijk; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01

3.  Long-term Clinical Outcome After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Andreas Schlögl; Theofilos Tourtas; Friedrich E Kruse; Julia M Weller
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Multicenter Study of 6-Month Clinical Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Silke Oellerich; Lamis Baydoun; Jorge Peraza-Nieves; Abbas Ilyas; Laurence Frank; Perry S Binder; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using eye bank-prepared tissues.

Authors:  Sophie X Deng; P James Sanchez; Luxia Chen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Frederico P Guerra; Arundhati Anshu; Marianne O Price; Arthur W Giebel; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles; T San Ong; Bob Ververs; Jacqueline van der Wees
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Learning Curve in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: First Series of 135 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Konstantinos Droutsas; Korine van Dijk; Kyros Moutsouris; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Five-Year Graft Survival Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Yuqiang Soh; Hla Myint Htoon; Jodhbir S Mehta; Donald Tan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Effect of donor preparation-to-use times on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew T Feng; Zachary N Burkhart; Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  3 in total

1.  "Endothelium-Out" and "Endothelium-In" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Hla M Htoon; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with imported donor corneas in eyes of Asian patients; endothelium-in versus endothelium-out method.

Authors:  Young-Ho Jung; Chang Ho Yoon; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  How to Avoid an Upside-Down Orientation of the Graft during Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?

Authors:  Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik; Alexander K Schuster; Lilian Rauch; Jessica Glaner; Aytan Musayeva; Jana C Riedl; Norbert Pfeiffer; Adrian Gericke
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 1.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.