Literature DB >> 18367694

Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.

Paula C Stacey1, A Quentin Summerfield.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of 3 self-administered strategies for auditory training that might improve speech perception by adult users of cochlear implants. The strategies are based, respectively, on discriminating isolated words, words in sentences, and phonemes in nonsense syllables.
METHOD: Participants were 18 normal-hearing adults who listened to speech processed by a noise-excited vocoder to simulate the information provided by a cochlear implant. They were assigned randomly to word-, sentence-, or phoneme-based training and underwent 9 training sessions (20 min each) on separate days over a 2- to 3-week period. The effectiveness of training was assessed as the improvement in accuracy of discriminating vowels and consonants, as well as identifying words in sentences, relative to participants' best performance in repeated tests prior to training.
RESULTS: Word- and sentence-based training led to significant improvements in the ability to identify words in sentences that were significantly larger than the improvements produced by phoneme-based training. There were no significant differences between the effectiveness of word- and sentence-based training. No significant improvements in consonant or vowel discrimination were found for the sentence- or phoneme-based training groups, but some improvements were found for the word-based training group.
CONCLUSION: The word- and sentence-based training strategies were more effective than the phoneme-based strategy at improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18367694     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/038)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  21 in total

1.  Perceptual adaptation to sinewave-vocoded speech across languages.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Jeremy L Loebach; Lawrence Phillips; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

4.  Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Michael F Dorman; Qian-Jie Fu; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Sandra I Oba; Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Impact of peripheral hearing loss on top-down auditory processing.

Authors:  Alexandria M H Lesicko; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Beyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain.

Authors:  David R Moore; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Sandra I Oba; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

10.  Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.