Literature DB >> 24357615

Conditional automaticity in response selection: contingent involuntary response inhibition with varied stimulus-response mapping.

Brian A Anderson1, Charles L Folk.   

Abstract

One aspect of effective cognitive control is the ability to withhold contextually inappropriate responses. The inhibition of a response can be elicited by a goal-relevant stop signal, which has been characterized as a voluntary cognitive process. Cases in which inhibition is triggered automatically by a stimulus have been reported but are limited to instances in which the withholding of a response is associated with the same stimulus over repeated trials, which reflects the gradual emergence of automaticity through associative learning. Findings such as these suggest that inhibitory control is driven by two dissociable mechanisms, one that is flexible but deliberate and another that is automatic but inflexibly learned. In the present study, we showed that response inhibition can be involuntarily triggered when stimulus-response mapping varies unpredictably, without contributions from associative learning. Our findings demonstrate that automatic response inhibition can be flexibly conditioned on top-down goals, which has broad implications for theories of cognitive control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automaticity; cognition(s); cognitive control; inhibition; response inhibition; selective attention

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24357615     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613511086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  9 in total

1.  Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk; Rebecca Garrison; Leeland Rogers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-04-07

Review 2.  Controlled information processing, automaticity, and the burden of proof.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Zhong-Lin Lu; Sheng He
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Neural mechanisms of goal-contingent task disengagement: Response-irrelevant stimuli activate the default mode network.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Motor Inhibition during Overt and Covert Actions: An Electrical Neuroimaging Study.

Authors:  Monica Angelini; Marta Calbi; Annachiara Ferrari; Beatrice Sbriscia-Fioretti; Michele Franca; Vittorio Gallese; Maria Alessandra Umiltà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Challenges to the Modularity Thesis Under the Bayesian Brain Models.

Authors:  Nithin George; Meera Mary Sunny
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Intact Goal-Driven Attentional Capture in Autistic Adults.

Authors:  Layal Husain; Nick Berggren; Anna Remington; Sophie Forster
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-03-26

8.  Neuronal Correlates of Cognitive Control during Gaming Revealed by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Matthias Witte; Manuel Ninaus; Silvia Erika Kober; Christa Neuper; Guilherme Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.

Authors:  Maisy Best; Natalia S Lawrence; Gordon D Logan; Ian P L McLaren; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.332

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.