Literature DB >> 22484411

A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches.

Donald G McLaren1, Michele L Ries, Guofan Xu, Sterling C Johnson.   

Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI) allows one to study task-related regional responses and task-dependent connectivity analysis using psychophysiological interaction (PPI) methods. The latter affords the additional opportunity to understand how brain regions interact in a task-dependent manner. The current implementation of PPI in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8) is configured primarily to assess connectivity differences between two task conditions, when in practice fMRI tasks frequently employ more than two conditions. Here we evaluate how a generalized form of context-dependent PPI (gPPI; http://www.nitrc.org/projects/gppi), which is configured to automatically accommodate more than two task conditions in the same PPI model by spanning the entire experimental space, compares to the standard implementation in SPM8. These comparisons are made using both simulations and an empirical dataset. In the simulated dataset, we compare the interaction beta estimates to their expected values and model fit using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). We found that interaction beta estimates in gPPI were robust to different simulated data models, were not different from the expected beta value, and had better model fits than when using standard PPI (sPPI) methods. In the empirical dataset, we compare the model fit of the gPPI approach to sPPI. We found that the gPPI approach improved model fit compared to sPPI. There were several regions that became non-significant with gPPI. These regions all showed significantly better model fits with gPPI. Also, there were several regions where task-dependent connectivity was only detected using gPPI methods, also with improved model fit. Regions that were detected with all methods had more similar model fits. These results suggest that gPPI may have greater sensitivity and specificity than standard implementation in SPM. This notion is tempered slightly as there is no gold standard; however, data simulations with a known outcome support our conclusions about gPPI. In sum, the generalized form of context-dependent PPI approach has increased flexibility of statistical modeling, and potentially improves model fit, specificity to true negative findings, and sensitivity to true positive findings. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22484411      PMCID: PMC3376181          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  21 in total

1.  The effects of single-trial averaging upon the spatial extent of fMRI activation.

Authors:  S A Huettel; G McCarthy
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Condition-dependent functional connectivity: syntax networks in bilinguals.

Authors:  Silke Dodel; Narly Golestani; Christophe Pallier; Vincent Elkouby; Denis Le Bihan; Jean-Baptiste Poline
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Francis M Miezin; James E Kelly; Randy L Buckner; David I Donaldson; Mark P McAvoy; Vidya M Bhalodia; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Choosing among generalized linear models applied to medical data.

Authors:  J K Lindsey; B Jones
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1.

Authors:  G M Boynton; S A Engel; G H Glover; D J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI.

Authors:  K J Friston; C D Frith; R Turner; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited.

Authors:  K J Friston; A P Holmes; J B Poline; P J Grasby; S C Williams; R S Frackowiak; R Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging.

Authors:  K J Friston; C Buechel; G R Fink; J Morris; E Rolls; R J Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Comparison of the Akaike Information Criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection.

Authors:  T M Ludden; S L Beal; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-10
View more
  557 in total

1.  Depression alters maternal extended amygdala response and functional connectivity during distress signals in attachment relationship.

Authors:  S Shaun Ho; James E Swain
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Brain hyper-connectivity and operation-specific deficits during arithmetic problem solving in children with developmental dyscalculia.

Authors:  Miriam Rosenberg-Lee; Sarit Ashkenazi; Tianwen Chen; Christina B Young; David C Geary; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-08-06

3.  Age-related differences in function and structure of rSMG and reduced functional connectivity with DLPFC explains heightened emotional egocentricity bias in childhood.

Authors:  Nikolaus Steinbeis; Boris C Bernhardt; Tania Singer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Amygdala-prefrontal cortical functional connectivity during implicit emotion processing differentiates youth with bipolar spectrum from youth with externalizing disorders.

Authors:  Danella Hafeman; Genna Bebko; Michele A Bertocci; Jay C Fournier; Henry W Chase; Lisa Bonar; Susan B Perlman; Michael Travis; Mary Kay Gill; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Scott K Holland; Robert A Kowatch; Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Sarah M Horwitz; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad; Thomas W Frazier; Eric A Youngstrom; Robert L Findling; Mary L Phillips
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Emotion regulation deficits in regular marijuana users.

Authors:  Kaeli Zimmermann; Christina Walz; Raissa T Derckx; Keith M Kendrick; Bernd Weber; Bruce Dore; Kevin N Ochsner; René Hurlemann; Benjamin Becker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Differential fMRI BOLD responses in amygdala in intermittent explosive disorder as a function of past Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  Emil F Coccaro; Sarah K Keedy; Stephanie M Gorka; Andrea C King; Jennifer R Fanning; Royce J Lee; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.376

7.  Corticostriatal output gating during selection from working memory.

Authors:  Christopher H Chatham; Michael J Frank; David Badre
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Striatal Hypersensitivity During Stress in Remitted Individuals with Recurrent Depression.

Authors:  Roee Admon; Laura M Holsen; Harlyn Aizley; Anne Remington; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Jill M Goldstein; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Increased functional coupling of the left amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex during the perception of communicative point-light stimuli.

Authors:  Imme C Zillekens; Marie-Luise Brandi; Juha M Lahnakoski; Atesh Koul; Valeria Manera; Cristina Becchio; Leonhard Schilbach
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Local response heterogeneity indexes experience-based neural differentiation in reading.

Authors:  Jeremy J Purcell; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.