Literature DB >> 27251871

Multilevel Provider-Based Sampling for Recruitment of Pregnant Women and Mother-Newborn Dyads.

Thomas J McLaughlin1, Onesky Aupont2, Claudia A Kozinetz3, David Hubble4, Tiffany A Moore-Simas2, Deborah Davis5, Christina Park6, Ruth Brenner6, Deidre Sepavich2, Marianne Felice2, Chantal Caviness7, Tim Downs8, Beatrice J Selwyn9, Michele R Forman10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2010, the National Children's Study launched 3 alternative recruitment methods to test possible improvements in efficiency compared with traditional household-based recruitment and participant enrollment. In 2012, a fourth method, provider-based sampling (PBS), tested a probability-based sampling of prenatal provider locations supplemented by a second cohort of neonates born at a convenience sample of maternity hospitals.
METHODS: From a sampling frame of 472 prenatal care provider locations and 59 maternity hospitals, 49 provider and 7 hospital locations within or just outside 3 counties participated in study recruitment. During first prenatal care visits or immediately postdelivery at these locations, face-to-face contact was used to screen and recruit eligible women.
RESULTS: Of 1450 screened women, 1270 were eligible. Consent rates at prenatal provider locations (62%-74% by county) were similar to those at birth locations (64%-77% by county). During 6 field months, 3 study centers enrolled a total prenatal cohort of 530 women (the majority in the first trimester) and during 2 months enrolled a birth cohort of an additional 320 mother-newborn dyads. As personnel became experienced in the field, the time required to enroll a woman in the prenatal cohort declined from up to 200 hours to 50 to 100 hours per woman recruited.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that PBS was feasible and operationally efficient in recruiting a representative cohort of newborns from 3 diverse US counties. Our findings suggest that PBS is a practical approach to recruit large pregnancy and birth cohorts across the United States.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27251871      PMCID: PMC4878109          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-4410F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

1.  National probability samples in studies of low-prevalence diseases. Part II: Designing and implementing the HIV cost and services utilization study sample.

Authors:  M R Frankel; M F Shapiro; N Duan; S C Morton; S H Berry; J A Brown; M A Burnam; S E Cohn; D P Goldman; D F McCaffrey; S M Smith; P A St Clair; J F Tebow; S A Bozzette
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  National probability samples in studies of low-prevalence diseases. Part I: Perspectives and lessons from the HIV cost and services utilization study.

Authors:  M F Shapiro; M L Berk; S H Berry; C A Emmons; L A Athey; D C Hsia; A A Leibowitz; C A Maida; M Marcus; J F Perlman; C L Schur; M A Schuster; J W Senterfitt; S A Bozzette
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Kathleen Belanger; Stephen Buka; Debra C Cherry; Donald J Dudley; Michael R Elliott; Daniel E Hale; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Jessica L Illuzzi; Nigel Paneth; James M Robbins; Elizabeth W Triche; Michael B Bracken
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Community engagement in epidemiological research.

Authors:  Jessica N Sapienza; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Sarah Keim; Alan R Fleischman
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2007 May-Jun

5.  The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using an Enhanced Household-Based Approach.

Authors:  Laura L Blaisdell; Jennifer A Zellner; Alison A King; Elaine Faustman; Mari Wilhelm; Mark L Hudak; Robert D Annett
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using the Provider-Based Recruitment Approach.

Authors:  Daniel E Hale; Sharon B Wyatt; Stephen Buka; Debra Cherry; Kendall K Cislo; Donald J Dudley; Pearl Anna McElfish; Gwendolyn S Norman; Simone A Reynolds; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Sandra Wadlinger; Cheryl K Walker; James M Robbins
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The National Children's Study: Early Recruitment Outcomes Using the Direct Outreach Approach.

Authors:  Patricia M McGovern; Nancy M Nachreiner; Jane L Holl; Neal Halfon; Dana Dabelea; Laura Caulfield; Jane A Cauley; Mark S Innocenti; Laura Amsden; Nina Markovic; Minsun Riddles; Sara Adams
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  The National Children's Study--a proposed plan.

Authors:  Alan E Guttmacher; Steven Hirschfeld; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Recruitment Strategy Outcomes in the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Christina H Park; Marianne Winglee; Jennifer Kwan; Linda Andrews; Mark L Hudak
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  The National Children's Study Archive Model: A 3-Tier Framework for Dissemination of Data and Specimens for General Use and Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Peter K Gilbertson; Susan Forrester; Linda Andrews; Kathleen McCann; Lydia Rogers; Christina Park; Jack Moye
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-03-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.