Literature DB >> 27251701

A modified breathing pattern improves the performance of a continuous capnodynamic method for estimation of effective pulmonary blood flow.

Caroline Hällsjö Sander1,2, Thorir Sigmundsson3,4, Magnus Hallbäck5, Fernando Suarez Sipmann6,7, Mats Wallin4,5, Anders Oldner3,4, Håkan Björne3,4.   

Abstract

In a previous study a new capnodynamic method for estimation of effective pulmonary blood flow (COEPBF) presented a good trending ability but a poor agreement with a reference cardiac output (CO) measurement at high levels of PEEP. In this study we aimed at evaluating the agreement and trending ability of a modified COEPBF algorithm that uses expiratory instead of inspiratory holds during CO and ventilatory manipulations. COEPBF was evaluated in a porcine model at different PEEP levels, tidal volumes and CO manipulations (N = 8). An ultrasonic flow probe placed around the pulmonary trunk was used for CO measurement. We tested the COEPBF algorithm using a modified breathing pattern that introduces cyclic end-expiratory time pauses. The subsequent changes in mean alveolar fraction of carbon dioxide were integrated into a capnodynamic equation and effective pulmonary blood flow, i.e. non-shunted CO, was calculated continuously breath by breath. The overall agreement between COEPBF and the reference method during all interventions was good with bias (limits of agreement) 0.05 (-1.1 to 1.2) L/min and percentage error of 36 %. The overall trending ability as assessed by the four-quadrant and the polar plot methodology was high with a concordance rate of 93 and 94 % respectively. The mean polar angle was 0.4 (95 % CI -3.7 to 4.5)°. A ventilatory pattern recurrently introducing end-expiratory pauses maintains a good agreement between COEPBF and the reference CO method while preserving its trending ability during CO and ventilatory alterations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon dioxide; Cardiac output; Monitoring; Perioperative

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27251701     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9891-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  31 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Anna Lee; Anthony M-H Ho
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Non-invasive automated measurement of cardiac output during stable cardiac surgery using a fully integrated differential CO(2) Fick method.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton; Daniel Thompson; Paul Junor
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  C Hällsjö Sander; M Hallbäck; M Wallin; P Emtell; A Oldner; H Björne
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output using partial CO2 rebreathing.

Authors:  J M Capek; R J Roy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Reliability of lithium dilution cardiac output in anaesthetized sheep.

Authors:  S M Axiak Flammer; L A Critchley; A Weber; T Pirbodaghi; H Brinks; S Vandenberghe
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton; Simon W Chong
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Maintaining tissue perfusion in high-risk surgical patients: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Sanderland T Gurgel; Paulo do Nascimento
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Systematic error of cardiac output measured by bolus thermodilution with a pulmonary artery catheter compared with that measured by an aortic flow probe in a pig model.

Authors:  Xiao X Yang; Lester A Critchley; Dewi K Rowlands; Zhu Fang; Li Huang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 10.  Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used?

Authors:  Davinder Ramsingh; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of volumetric capnography in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Peter Kremeier; Stephan H Böhm; Gerardo Tusman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  [Foundations of Volumetric capnography : Principles of monitoring of metabolism and hemodynamics].

Authors:  S H Böhm; P Kremeier; G Tusman; D A Reuter; S Pulletz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Performance of a capnodynamic method estimating effective pulmonary blood flow during transient and sustained hypercapnia.

Authors:  Thorir Svavar Sigmundsson; Tomas Öhman; Magnus Hallbäck; Eider Redondo; Fernando Suarez Sipmann; Mats Wallin; Anders Oldner; Caroline Hällsjö Sander; Håkan Björne
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  New generation continuous cardiac output monitoring from carbon dioxide elimination.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton; Mats Wallin; Magnus Hallbäck
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Performance of a capnodynamic method estimating cardiac output during respiratory failure - before and after lung recruitment.

Authors:  Thorir Svavar Sigmundsson; Tomas Öhman; Magnus Hallbäck; Eider Redondo; Fernando Suarez Sipmann; Mats Wallin; Anders Oldner; Caroline Hällsjö-Sander; Håkan Björne
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Non-invasive capnodynamic mixed venous oxygen saturation during major changes in oxygen delivery.

Authors:  Anders Svedmyr; Mark Konrad; Mats Wallin; Magnus Hallbäck; Per-Arne Lönnqvist; Jacob Karlsson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 7.  What is new in hemodynamic monitoring and management?

Authors:  Moritz Flick; Alina Bergholz; Pawel Sierzputowski; Simon T Vistisen; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.977

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.