| Literature DB >> 34609659 |
Anders Svedmyr1,2, Mark Konrad3, Mats Wallin1,3, Magnus Hallbäck3, Per-Arne Lönnqvist1,2, Jacob Karlsson4,5.
Abstract
Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) is an important variable in anesthesia and intensive care but currently requires pulmonary artery catheterization. Recently, non-invasive determination of SvO2 (Capno-SvO2) using capnodynamics has shown good agreement against CO-oximetry in an animal model of modest hemodynamic changes. The purpose of the current study was to validate Capno-SvO2 against CO-oximetry during major alterations in oxygen delivery. Furthermore, evaluating fiberoptic SvO2 for its response to the same challenges. Eleven mechanically ventilated pigs were exposed to oxygen delivery changes: increased inhaled oxygen concentration, hemorrhage, crystalloid and blood transfusion, preload reduction and dobutamine infusion. Capno-SvO2 and fiberoptic SvO2 recordings were made in parallel with CO-oximetry. Respiratory quotient, needed for capnodynamic SvO2, was measured by analysis of mixed expired gases. Agreement of absolute values between CO-oximetry and Capno-SvO2 and fiberoptic SvO2 respectively, was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Ability of Capno- SvO2 and fiberoptic SvO2 to detect change compared to CO-oximetry was assessed using concordance analysis. The interventions caused significant hemodynamic variations. Bias between Capno-SvO2 and CO-oximetry was + 3% points (95% limits of agreements - 7 to + 13). Bias between fiberoptic SvO2 and CO-oximetry was + 1% point, (95% limits of agreements - 7 to + 9). Concordance rate for Capno-SvO2 and fiberoptic SvO2 vs. CO-oximetry was 98% and 93%, respectively. Capno-SvO2 generates absolute values close to CO-oximetry. The performance of Capno-SvO2 vs. CO-oximetry was comparable to the performance of fiberoptic SvO2 vs. CO-oximetry. Capno-SvO2 appears to be a promising tool for non-invasive SvO2 monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon dioxide; Cardiac output; Hemodynamic monitoring; Oximetry; Oxygen; Pulmonary artery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34609659 PMCID: PMC8490846 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00762-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Monit Comput ISSN: 1387-1307 Impact factor: 1.977
Fig. 1Scheme of the study protocol. RQ respiratory quotient; (FiO2), FiO2 steps. Black arrows indicate calibration points were fiberoptic SvO2 was calibrated against CO-oximetry and hemoglobin and Capno-SvO2 against current hemoglobin
Fig. 2Event plot showing SvO2 responses to the various hemodynamic challenges for all three SvO2 monitoring methods. Values are mean (95% CI). N = 11. Arrows indicate recalibration points for SvO2-capno and fiberoptic SvO2. BL Baseline, BL mean of precision recordings, FiO fraction inspired oxygen; BL Baseline cava occlusion step, Cavaoccl.2 min 2 min after cava occlusion, Cava defl. 3 min 3 min after cava balloon deflation
Fig. 3Bland–Altman plots for pooled recordings for Capno-SvO2 vs. CO-oximetry (A) and fiberoptic SvO2 vs. CO-oximetry (B). Dotted line represents bias, blue dotted lines represent upper and lower limits of agreement and black broken lines represents the corresponding CI for the limits of agreements. N = 11. A 271 paired data points, B 272 paired data points
Bias and limits of agreement between Capno-SvO2 and CO-oximetry SvO2 as well as between fiberoptic and CO-oximetry SvO2 for the various hemodynamic challenges
| Hemodynamic intervention | Compared methods | Bias (percentage points) | ULOA (CI) (percentage points) | LLOA(CI) (percentage points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline precision | Capno vs. CO-oxi | 2 | 10 (7 to 16) | − 6 (− 12 to − 3) |
| Fiber vs. CO-oxi | 2 | 10 (7 to 15) | − 6 (− 12 to − 4) | |
| FiO 2 | Capno vs. CO-oxi | 1 | 11 (8 to 18) | − 8 (− 15 to − 5) |
| Fiber vs. CO-oxi | 0 | 7 (7 to 11) | − 7 (− 12 to − 5) | |
| Hemorrhage | Capno vs. CO-oxi | 3 | 14 (10 to 23) | − 8 (− 17 to − 4) |
| Fiber vs. CO-oxi | 2 | 13 (9 to 20) | − 8 (− 15 to − 4) | |
| Crystalloid infusion | Capno vs. CO-oxi | 6 | 17 (14 to 23) | − 6 (− 12 to − 3) |
| Fiber vs. CO-oxi | 3 | 10 (8 to 15) | − 3 (− 8 to − 1) | |
| Transfusion | Capno vs. CO-oxi | 1 | 7 (5 to 11) | − 5 (− 8 to − 3) |
| Fiber vs. CO-oxi | 1 | 9 (7 to 14) | − 8 (− 13 to − 6) | |
| Cava balloon | Capno vs. CO-oxi | 5 | 13 (10 to 19) | − 4 (− 10 to − 1) |
| Fiber vs. CO-oxi | 1 | 6 (4 to 9) | − 6 (− 8 to − 3) | |
| Dobutamine infusion | Capno vs. CO-oxi | 5 | 11 (8 to 17) | − 2 (− 7 to 1) |
| Fiber vs. CO-oxi | − 1 | 8 (4 to 16) | − 10 (− 18 to − 6) |
ULOA upper limits of agreement, LLOA lower limits of agreement, CI 95% confidence interval, Capno Capno-SvO2, CO-oxi CO-oximetry SvO2, Fiber fiberoptic SvO2
Fig. 4Four quadrant plots presenting the concordance between Capno-SvO2 and CO-oximetry SvO2 (A) and between fiberoptic SvO2 and CO-oximetry SvO2 (B). A 44 paired delta values, B 46 paired delta values. The central boxed area illustrates the 10% exclusion zone. Dotted line is line of identity. N = 11