| Literature DB >> 27251139 |
Julian A Rees1,2, Aleksandra Wandzilak1,3, Dimitrios Maganas1, Nicole I C Wurster1, Stefan Hugenbruch1, Joanna K Kowalska1, Christopher J Pollock1,4, Frederico A Lima5, Kenneth D Finkelstein6, Serena DeBeer7,8.
Abstract
A series of vanadium compounds was studied by K-edge X-ray absorption (XAS) and K[Formula: see text] X-ray emission spectroscopies (XES). Qualitative trends within the datasets, as well as comparisons between the XAS and XES data, illustrate the information content of both methods. The complementary nature of the chemical insight highlights the success of this dual-technique approach in characterizing both the structural and electronic properties of vanadium sites. In particular, and in contrast to XAS or extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), we demonstrate that valence-to-core XES is capable of differentiating between ligating atoms with the same identity but different bonding character. Finally, density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT calculations enable a more detailed, quantitative interpretation of the data. We also establish correction factors for the computational protocols through calibration to experiment. These hard X-ray methods can probe vanadium ions in any oxidation or spin state, and can readily be applied to sample environments ranging from solid-phase catalysts to biological samples in frozen solution. Thus, the combined XAS and XES approach, coupled with DFT calculations, provides a robust tool for the study of vanadium atoms in bioinorganic chemistry.Entities:
Keywords: Density functional theory DFT; Vanadium; X-ray spectroscopy; XAS; XES
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27251139 PMCID: PMC4989026 DOI: 10.1007/s00775-016-1358-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem ISSN: 0949-8257 Impact factor: 3.358
Vanadium compounds examined in this study, and relevant properties thereof
| Compound | Oxidation state |
| Coordination | Nominal symmetry | Ligand type(s) | Bond lengtha (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| V | 0 | Lattice (4) |
| V–O | 1.71 (1.69–1.73) |
|
| V | 0 | Lattice (4) |
| V–O | 1.72 (1.64–1.81) |
|
| V | 0 | Lattice (6) |
| V–O | 1.96 (1.59–2.79) |
|
| IV | 1 | Lattice (6) |
| V–O | 1.93 (1.76–2.05) |
|
| IV | 1 | 5 |
| V–O, V=O | 1.59, 1.99 |
|
| IV | 1 | 4 | dist. | V–Cpb, V–Cl | 2.31, 2.41 |
|
| III | 2 | Lattice (6) |
| V–O | 2.01 (1.96–2.07) |
|
| III | 2 | 6 |
| V–O, V–Cl | 2.32, 2.08 |
|
| III | 2 | 6 |
| V–O | 1.98 |
|
| III | 2 | Lattice (6) |
| V–Cl | 2.42 |
|
| II | 3 | Lattice (6) |
| V–Cl | 2.53 |
aEntries are given as mean (range)
b Cp -cyclopentadienyl
Comparison of experimental and calculated XAS parameters
| Compound | Experimental | Experimental pre-edge | Calculated pre-edge | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edge energy (eV) | Energy (eV) | Intensity | Energy (eV) | Intensity | |
|
| 5481.8 | 5469.1 | 261 | 5469.3 | 262 |
|
| 5482.0 | 5469.3 | 301 | 5469.6 | 300 |
|
| 5480.5 | 5470.0 | 198 | 5470.1 | 227 |
|
| 5477.1 | 5468.7 | 102 | 5470.0 | 41 |
|
| 5480.8 | 5468.4 | 149 | 5468.7 | 198 |
|
| 5475.7 | 5468.4 | 28 | 5467.5 | 4.0 |
|
| 5475.0 | 5469.1 | 73 | 5469.8 | 18 |
|
| 5475.5 | 5467.4 | 26 | 5467.1 | 3.8 |
|
| 5479.3 | 5467.5 | 20 | 5467.3 | 7.2 |
|
| 5473.7 | 5467.5 | 31 | 5466.4 | 0.8 |
|
| 5471.2 | 5466.2 | 16 | 5466.0 | 1.3 |
Full edge regions are shown in the Supplemental Information, Figures S1–S5
Calculated IWAEs have been shifted by 115.1 eV and intensities are scaled by a factor of 9.7 from calibrations in Fig. 7
Total experimental intensities have been multiplied by 100
Comparison of experimental and calculated XES parameters
| Compound | Experimental | Experimental VtC | Calculated VtC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mainline energy (eV) | Energy (eV) | Intensity ( | Energy (eV) | Intensity | |
|
| 5426.1 | 5447.8, 5464.4 | 69.4 | 5448.3, 5462.6 | 69.5 |
|
| 5426.1 | 5447.3, 5463.8 | 71.1 | 5448.3, 5462.6 | 69.5 |
|
| 5426.3 | 5448.1, 5462.9 | 58.5 | 5448.7, 5462.1 | 68.1 |
|
| 5427.0 | 5446.8, 5458.0 | 51.8 | 5448.3, 5461.7 | 56.6 |
|
| 5427.0 | 5441.5, 5458.5 | 45.7 | 5449.3, 5463.1 | 47.3 |
|
| 5427.4 | 5445.7, 5462.6 | 38.8 | 5451.4, 5462.0 | 38.9 |
|
| 5427.3 | 5446.0, 5456.8 | 47.2 | 5443.9, 5457.7 | 48.4 |
|
| 5427.4 | 5450.0, 5462.0 | 35.1 | 5451.1, 5462.0 | 36.0 |
Calculated IWAEs have been shifted 141.9 eV from the calibration in Fig. 6
Fig. 1Experimental (left) and calculated (right) pre-edge regions of the XAS spectra of , , and . Calculated pre-edge spectra are shifted by 115.1 eV
Fig. 7Correlations between experimental and calculated XAS pre-edge energies (left) and intensities (right). Markers are color coded by vanadium oxidation state, with red , green , blue , and black . Equations for the linear fits: ,
Fig. 2Experimental (left) and calculated (right) pre-edge regions of the XAS spectra of and . Calculated pre-edge spectra are shifted by 115.1 eV, the calculated spectrum has been scaled up by a factor of 10 for clarity, and the quadrupole contribution to the pre-edge is shown as the dashed trace
Fig. 3Mainline regions of the K XES spectra. The dashed vertical line is a visual guide for the shift in peak maxima to higher energy upon reduction. The horizontal markers show the expected magnitude of 3p–3d exchange, corresponding to 3 eV per unpaired electron, and the right edges are aligned with the average K maximum for the V(IV) and V(III) oxidation states
Fig. 6Correlations between experimental and calculated VtC energies (left) and intensities (right). Markers are color coded by vanadium oxidation state, with green , blue , and black . Equations for the linear fits: ,
Fig. 4Experimental (left) and calculated (right) VtC regions of the K XES spectra of , , and . Calculated VtC spectra are shifted by 141.9 eV
Fig. 5Experimental (left) and calculated (right) VtC regions of the K XES spectra of and . The denotes the K feature of determined from the first spectral moment. Calculated VtC spectra are shifted by 141.9 eV, and the major orbital contributions to the calculated transitions are assigned