Sarah Hales1, Caroline Dunn2, Sara Wilcox3, Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy2. 1. Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA bridges5@email.sc.edu. 2. Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. 3. Department of Exercise Science, USC Prevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Apps using digital photos to track dietary intake and provide feedback are common, but currently there has been no research examining what evidence-based strategies are included in these apps. METHODS: A content analysis of mobile apps for photo diet tracking was conducted, including whether effective techniques for interventions promoting behavior change, including self-regulation, for healthy eating (HE) are targeted. An initial search of app stores yielded 34 apps (n = 8 Android and Apple; n = 11 Android; n = 15 Apple). One app was removed (unable to download), and other apps (n = 4) were unable to be rated (no longer available). Remaining apps (n = 29) were downloaded, reviewed, and coded by 2 independent reviewers to determine the number of known effective self-regulation and other behavior change techniques included. The raters met to compare their coding of the apps, calculate interrater agreement, resolve any discrepancies, and come to a consensus. RESULTS: Six apps (21%) did not utilize any of the behavior change techniques examined. Three apps (10%) provided feedback to users via crowdsourcing or collective feedback from other users and professionals, 7 apps (24%) used crowdsourcing or collective feedback, 1 app (3%) used professionals, and 18 apps (62%) did not provide any dietary feedback to users. CONCLUSION: Few photo diet-tracking apps include evidence-based strategies to improve dietary intake. Use of photos to self-monitor dietary intake and receive feedback has the potential to reduce user burden for self-monitoring, yet photo diet tracking apps need to incorporate known effective behavior strategies for HE, including self-regulation.
BACKGROUND: Apps using digital photos to track dietary intake and provide feedback are common, but currently there has been no research examining what evidence-based strategies are included in these apps. METHODS: A content analysis of mobile apps for photo diet tracking was conducted, including whether effective techniques for interventions promoting behavior change, including self-regulation, for healthy eating (HE) are targeted. An initial search of app stores yielded 34 apps (n = 8 Android and Apple; n = 11 Android; n = 15 Apple). One app was removed (unable to download), and other apps (n = 4) were unable to be rated (no longer available). Remaining apps (n = 29) were downloaded, reviewed, and coded by 2 independent reviewers to determine the number of known effective self-regulation and other behavior change techniques included. The raters met to compare their coding of the apps, calculate interrater agreement, resolve any discrepancies, and come to a consensus. RESULTS: Six apps (21%) did not utilize any of the behavior change techniques examined. Three apps (10%) provided feedback to users via crowdsourcing or collective feedback from other users and professionals, 7 apps (24%) used crowdsourcing or collective feedback, 1 app (3%) used professionals, and 18 apps (62%) did not provide any dietary feedback to users. CONCLUSION: Few photo diet-tracking apps include evidence-based strategies to improve dietary intake. Use of photos to self-monitor dietary intake and receive feedback has the potential to reduce user burden for self-monitoring, yet photo diet tracking apps need to incorporate known effective behavior strategies for HE, including self-regulation.
Authors: Ali H Mokdad; Earl S Ford; Barbara A Bowman; William H Dietz; Frank Vinicor; Virginia S Bales; James S Marks Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Christina D Lee; Junghoon Chae; TusaRebecca E Schap; Deborah A Kerr; Edward J Delp; David S Ebert; Carol J Boushey Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2012-03-01
Authors: Lora E Burke; Molly B Conroy; Susan M Sereika; Okan U Elci; Mindi A Styn; Sushama D Acharya; Mary A Sevick; Linda J Ewing; Karen Glanz Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Sara Wilcox; Alycia Boutté; Brent E Hutto; Camelia Singletary; Eric R Muth; Adam W Hoover Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Sara Wilcox; Alycia Boutté; Brent E Hutto; Camelia Singletary; Eric R Muth; Adam W Hoover Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-06-10 Impact factor: 5.002