| Literature DB >> 27247925 |
Reza Mohebbati1, Mohammad Naser Shafei2, Mohammad Soukhtanloo3, Noema Mohammadian Roshan4, Abolfazl Khajavi Rad5, Akbar Anaeigoudari6, Sara Hosseinian1, Sareh Karimi1, Farimah Beheshti1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Inflammation and oxidative stress is considered to have a crucial role in induction of nephropathy. Curcuma longa (C. longa) and Nigella sativa (N. sativa) have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. This study was designed to investigate the effect of mixed hydro-alcoholic extract of N.sativa and C. longa on the oxidative stress induced by Adriamycin (ADR) in rat kidney.Entities:
Keywords: Adriamycin; Curcuma longa; Nigella sativa; Oxidative stress
Year: 2016 PMID: 27247925 PMCID: PMC4884221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Figure 1Comparison of the MDA concentrations in renal tissue of experimental groups. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM (n= 8 in each group). **p<0.01 compared to control group. #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 and ###p< 0.001 compared to ADR group. &p<0.05 compared to N.S E+ ADR group. @@p<0.01 compared to C.L E + ADR group. ^p<0.05 compared to VIT C + ADR group
Figure 2Comparison of the total thiol concentration in renal tissue of experimental groups. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM (n= 8 in each group). **p<0.01 compared to control group. ##p<0.01 and ###p< 0.001 compared to ADR group. &p<0.05 compared to N.S E+ ADR group. ^p<0.05 compared to VIT C + ADR group.
Figure 3Comparison of the SOD activity in renal tissue of six groups. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM (n= 8 in each group). **P<0.01 compared with control group. #P<0.05 and ###P< 0.001 compared with ADR group. &P<0.05 compared to N.S E+ ADR group. @@P<0.01 compared to C.L E + ADR group. ^P<0.05 compared to VIT C + ADR group
Figure 4Comparison of renal index percentage in six groups. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM (n= 8 in each group). *p<0.05 compared with control group
Figure 5Comparison of urine and serum osmolarity between the six groups in different days. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM (n= 8 in each group). There was no significant difference in urine and serum osmollarity between groups