| Literature DB >> 30988999 |
Zohreh Naji Ebrahimi Yazd1, Zahra Samadi Noshahr1,2, Sara Hosseinian1,3, Mohammad Naser Shafei1,4, Alireza Ebrahimzadeh Bideskan5, Reza Mohebbati1, Nazanin Entezari Heravi1, Samira Shahraki1,2, Somayeh Mahzari1, Abolfazl Khajavi Rad1,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Adriamycin (ADR) is an important anti-cancer drug which can cause renal toxicity. Given the known anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of Plantago major (P. major), the aim of this study was to determine the effects of hydroalcoholic extract of P. major on ADR- induced nephropathy in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Plantago major; adriamycin; apoptosis; extract; nephrotic syndrome; rat
Year: 2019 PMID: 30988999 PMCID: PMC6461299 DOI: 10.3831/KPI.2019.22.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharmacopuncture ISSN: 2093-6966
Figure 1Change in serum cholesterol levels in the experimental groups. The data are shown as mean ± SEM; n = 10. **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 vs. control group and < 0.001 vs. ADR group and < 0.001 vs. Ext-600-ADR group at each given time point. (Main effect by two-way mixed design ANOVA: treatment: P < 0.001; time: P < 0.001; interactions: P < 0.001).
Figure 2Serum albumin concentration in the experimental groups. The data are shown as mean ± SEM; n = 10. **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 vs. control group and < 0.05, < 0.01 < 0.001 vs. ADR group at each given time point. (Main effect by two-way mixed design ANOVA: treatment: P < 0.001; time: P < 0.001; interactions: P < 0.001).
Figure 3Change in proteinuria in experimental groups. The data are shown as mean ± SEM; n = 10. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. control group and < 0.05, < 0.001 vs. ADR group at each given time point. (Main effect by two-way mixed design ANOVA: treatment: P < 0.001; time: P < 0.001; interactions: P < 0.001).
Figure 4Glomerular filtration rate. The data are shown as mean ± SEM; n = 10. (Main effect by two-way mixed design ANOVA: treatment: P = 0.688; time: P < 0.05; interactions: P = 0.249).
Figure 5Comparison of TUNEL positive (apoptotic) cells per unit area (mm2) in the rat kidney of the all experimental groups. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. control group and < 0.001 vs. ADR group.
| In the present study, the animals were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=10) as follows:
|