BACKGROUND: Helically shaped cephalic implants have proven their benefit to provide an improved stabilization of unstable hip fractures. However, cut out ratios up to 3.6% still occur. This in vitro study evaluated the biomechanical performance of a novel cement augmentation technique of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in surrogate femora. METHODS: Four study groups were formed out of 24 polyurethane foam specimens with low density. Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blades were implanted, either non-augmented, or augmented using 3ml of injectable Polymethylmethacrylate bone-cement. The influence of implant mal-positioning was investigated by placing the blade either centered in the femoral head or off-centric in an anteroposterior direction. All specimens underwent cyclic loading under physiological conditions. Starting at 1000 N, the load was monotonically increased by 0.1N/cycle until construct failure. Movement of the head was identified by means of optical motion tracking. Non-parametric test statistics were carried out on the cycles to failure, to compare between study groups. FINDINGS: Compared to control samples; augmented samples showed a significantly increased number of cycles to failure (P=0.012). In the groups with centric position of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blade, cement augmentation led to an increase in loading cycles of 225%. In the groups with off-centric positioning of the blade, this difference was even more accentuated (933%). INTERPRETATION: Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blade with small amounts of bone-cement for treatment of osteoporotic hip fractures clearly enhances fixation stability and carries high potential for clinical application.
BACKGROUND: Helically shaped cephalic implants have proven their benefit to provide an improved stabilization of unstable hip fractures. However, cut out ratios up to 3.6% still occur. This in vitro study evaluated the biomechanical performance of a novel cement augmentation technique of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in surrogate femora. METHODS: Four study groups were formed out of 24 polyurethane foam specimens with low density. Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blades were implanted, either non-augmented, or augmented using 3ml of injectable Polymethylmethacrylate bone-cement. The influence of implant mal-positioning was investigated by placing the blade either centered in the femoral head or off-centric in an anteroposterior direction. All specimens underwent cyclic loading under physiological conditions. Starting at 1000 N, the load was monotonically increased by 0.1N/cycle until construct failure. Movement of the head was identified by means of optical motion tracking. Non-parametric test statistics were carried out on the cycles to failure, to compare between study groups. FINDINGS: Compared to control samples; augmented samples showed a significantly increased number of cycles to failure (P=0.012). In the groups with centric position of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blade, cement augmentation led to an increase in loading cycles of 225%. In the groups with off-centric positioning of the blade, this difference was even more accentuated (933%). INTERPRETATION: Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blade with small amounts of bone-cement for treatment of osteoporotic hip fractures clearly enhances fixation stability and carries high potential for clinical application.
Authors: Dirk Wähnert; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; R Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; Markus Windolf Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Ingmar F Rompen; Matthias Knobe; Bjoern-Christian Link; Frank J P Beeres; Ralf Baumgaertner; Nadine Diwersi; Filippo Migliorini; Sven Nebelung; Reto Babst; Bryan J M van de Wall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240