Literature DB >> 27244699

Emerging trends in surgical and adjuvant radiation therapies among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Oyewale O Shiyanbola1, Brian L Sprague2,3, John M Hampton1, Kim Dittus3,4, Ted A James2,3, Sally Herschorn3,5, Ronald E Gangnon1,6, Donald L Weaver3,7, Amy Trentham-Dietz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of surgery and radiation therapy in treating ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is directed by treatment guidelines and evidence from research. This study investigated recent patterns in DCIS treatment by demographic factors.
METHODS: Data for women diagnosed with DCIS between 1998 and 2011 (n = 416,232) in the National Cancer Data Base were assessed for trends in treatment patterns by age group, calendar year, ancestral/ethnic group, and geographic region. The likelihood of receiving specific treatment modalities was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: DCIS cases were most frequently treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiation (45.6%). After an initial rise, the use of adjuvant radiation after BCS plateaued at approximately 70% after 2007, with increasing utilization of mastectomy beyond 2005. In addition, there was an increasing trend in postmastectomy reconstruction over time, and women of African ancestry (odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.72) and Hispanic women (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.89) were less likely to undergo reconstruction in comparison with women of European ancestry. A similar trend was observed in contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy utilization, with women of European ancestry having a more rapid rise in the utilization of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in comparison with all other ancestral/ethnic groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Recent trends demonstrate a plateau in radiation therapy administration after BCS along with increasing utilization of mastectomy, reconstruction, and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy. There are substantial differences in treatment utilization according to ancestry/ethnicity and geographical region. Further studies examining patient-physician decision making surrounding DCIS treatment are warranted. Cancer 2016.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2810-2818. © 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; ductal carcinoma in situ; mastectomy; radiation; reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27244699      PMCID: PMC5014675          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  41 in total

1.  Patient motivations for choosing postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Claire S Duggal; Drew Metcalfe; Robyn Sackeyfio; Grant W Carlson; Albert Losken
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Tari A King; Rita Sakr; Sujata Patil; Inga Gurevich; Michelle Stempel; Michelle Sampson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program.

Authors:  V L Ernster; J Barclay; K Kerlikowske; H Wilkie; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-10

4.  Association of hospital volume with conditional 90-day mortality after cystectomy: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Matthew E Nielsen; Katherine Mallin; Mark A Weaver; Bryan Palis; Andrew Stewart; David P Winchester; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Long-term results of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  P T Neff; H D Bear; C V Pierce; M M Grimes; M D Fleming; J P Neifeld; D Arthur; J S Horsley; W Lawrence; M J Kornstein
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthew M Poggi; David N Danforth; Linda C Sciuto; Sharon L Smith; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; Cynthia Menard; Marc E Lippman; Allen S Lichter; Rosemary M Altemus
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Receipt of recommended radiation therapy among rural and urban cancer patients.

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; Shilpen Patel; C Holly A Andrilla; Roger A Rosenblatt; Mark P Doescher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy.

Authors:  Howard T Wang; Constance M Barone; Megan B Steigelman; Morton Kahlenberg; Dennis Rousseau; Jamie Berger; Allison Daum; Delio P Ortegon
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 9.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes.

Authors:  Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Tatyana Shamliyan; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Trends in Black-White Disparities in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in a Changing Screening Environment: The Peters-Belson Approach Using United States National Health Interview Surveys 2000-2010.

Authors:  Sowmya R Rao; Nancy Breen; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of incorporating a hypothetical DCIS prognostic marker into breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy Trentham-Dietz; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Oguzhan Alagoz; Natasha K Stout; Ronald E Gangnon; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Pamela M Vacek; Sally D Herschorn; Elizabeth S Burnside; Anna N A Tosteson; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ grade via triple-modal molecular imaging of B7-H3 expression.

Authors:  Sunitha Bachawal; Gregory R Bean; Gregor Krings; Katheryne E Wilson
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Effect of Patient Age on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Modeling Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): An Overview of CISNET Model Approaches.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jeroen J van den Broek; Xiaoxue Li; Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; Xuelin Huang; Donald L Weaver; Elizabeth S Burnside; Rinaa S Punglia; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Evaluation of Long-Term Satisfaction with Breast Surgery in Patients Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Devon Livingston-Rosanoff; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Polly A Newcomb; Lee G Wilke
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Institutions Treating Breast Cancer Patients of a Low Socioeconomic Status Achieve Multidisciplinary Quality Standards at Lower Rates.

Authors:  Austin D Williams; Robin Ciocca; Jennifer L Sabol; Ned Z Carp
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Association of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a 12-Gene Expression Assay With Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Justin Romanoff; Seema A Khan; Ruth Carlos; Lawrence J Solin; Sunil Badve; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Ralph L Corsetti; Habib Rahbar; Derrick W Spell; Kenneth B Blankstein; Linda K Han; Jennifer L Sabol; John R Bumberry; Ilana Gareen; Bradley S Snyder; Lynne I Wagner; Kathy D Miller; Joseph A Sparano; Christopher Comstock
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Rural-urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: A patterns of care analysis.

Authors:  Danielle Riley; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Ingrid M Lizarraga; Mary Charlton; Brian J Smith; Charles F Lynch
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.711

9.  Evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ grade via triple-modal molecular imaging of B7-H3 expression.

Authors:  Sunitha Bachawal; Gregory R Bean; Gregor Krings; Katheryne E Wilson
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-04-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.