Literature DB >> 33574299

Evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ grade via triple-modal molecular imaging of B7-H3 expression.

Sunitha Bachawal1, Gregory R Bean2, Gregor Krings3, Katheryne E Wilson4.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) will account for 62,930 cases of breast cancer in 2019. DCIS is a pre-invasive lesion which may not progress to invasive carcinoma, yet surgery remains the mainstay treatment. Molecular imaging of a specific marker for DCIS grade for detection and active surveillance are critically needed to reduce potential overtreatment. First, breast cancer marker B7-H3 (CD276) expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining in 123 human specimens including benign epithelium (H-score 10.0 ± 8.2) and low (20.8 ± 17.7), intermediate (87.1 ± 69.5), and high (159.1 ± 87.6) grade DCIS, showing a positive association with DCIS nuclear grade (P < 0.001, AUC 0.96). Next, a murine DCIS model was combined with ultrasound molecular imaging of B7-H3 targeted microbubbles to differentiate normal glands from those harboring DCIS (n = 100, FVB/N-Tg(MMTVPyMT)634Mul, AUC 0.89). Finally, photoacoustic and fluorescence molecular imaging with an anti-B7-H3 antibody-indocyanine green conjugate were utilized for DCIS detection (n = 53). Molecular imaging of B7-H3 expression may allow for active surveillance of DCIS.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33574299     DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0158-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer        ISSN: 2374-4677


  51 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  John R Scheel; Janie M Lee; Brian L Sprague; Christoph I Lee; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Comparative effectiveness of incorporating a hypothetical DCIS prognostic marker into breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy Trentham-Dietz; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Oguzhan Alagoz; Natasha K Stout; Ronald E Gangnon; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Pamela M Vacek; Sally D Herschorn; Elizabeth S Burnside; Anna N A Tosteson; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Emerging trends in surgical and adjuvant radiation therapies among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Oyewale O Shiyanbola; Brian L Sprague; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Sally Herschorn; Ronald E Gangnon; Donald L Weaver; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial.

Authors:  Adele Francis; Jeremy Thomas; Lesley Fallowfield; Matthew Wallis; John M S Bartlett; Cassandra Brookes; Tracy Roberts; Sarah Pirrie; Claire Gaunt; Jennie Young; Lucinda Billingham; David Dodwell; Andrew Hanby; Sarah E Pinder; Andrew Evans; Malcolm Reed; Valerie Jenkins; Lucy Matthews; Maggie Wilcox; Patricia Fairbrother; Sarah Bowden; Daniel Rea
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  Ultrasound contrast agents and ultrasound molecular imaging.

Authors:  Qiaonong Wen; Suiren Wan; Zengli Liu; Shuang Xu; Hairui Wang; Biao Yang
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-01

7.  Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Computational Risk Analysis.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Mathias Worni; Elizabeth L Turner; Jeffrey R Marks; Rick Durrett; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Paradigm Shift toward Reducing Overtreatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of Breast.

Authors:  Yasuaki Sagara; Wong Julia; Mehra Golshan; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.