| Literature DB >> 27234510 |
Geert Hendrikx1,2, Mark H Vries3,2, Matthias Bauwens1, Marijke De Saint-Hubert1, Allard Wagenaar3, Joël Guillaume1, Levinia Boonen1, Mark J Post3,2, Felix M Mottaghy4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the accuracy of laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) in an animal model for hind limb ischemia.Entities:
Keywords: Hind limb ischemia; Laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI); Overestimation of therapeutic window; Perfusion recovery; Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
Year: 2016 PMID: 27234510 PMCID: PMC4883021 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-016-0199-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res ISSN: 2191-219X Impact factor: 3.138
Fig. 1A typical representation of perfusion recovery in the mouse hind limb over time as can be seen by LDPI. A representative ROI placement for LDPI is shown in the baseline panel
Fig. 3Average LDPI ratios (ischemic/non-ischemic) of both groups, n = 7 in the 99mTc-sestamibi group, n ≥ 5 in the 99mTc-PyP group (a). Average ratios determined from SUVs calculated in the 99mTc-sestamibi scanned group with n ≥ 6 for every time point (b). Average ratios determined from SUVs calculated in the 99mTc-PyP scanned group with n ≥ 3 for every time point (c). All data are represented as mean ± SEM. Asterisk indicates significantly different from non-ischemic in the 99mTc-sestamibi group while number sign is used for significantly different from non-ischemic in the 99mTc-PyP group
Overview of the average LDPI ratios ischemic/non-ischemic limb in the 99mTc-sestamibi and 99mTc-PyP scanned group per time point
| LDPI | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 99mTc-sestamibi group | |||
| Time point | Ratio ± SEM |
|
|
| Baseline | 0.98 ± 0.039 | NS | 7 |
| Post-operatively | 0.02 ± 0.004 |
| 7 |
| Day 3 | 0.10 ± 0.023 |
| 7 |
| Day 7 | 0.19 ± 0.035 |
| 7 |
| Day 14 | 0.22 ± 0.016 |
| 7 |
| 99mTc-PyP group | |||
| Time point | Ratio ± SEM |
|
|
| Baseline | 1.00 ± 0.015 | NS | 6 |
| Post-operatively | 0.02 ± 0.002 |
| 6 |
| Day 3 | 0.10 ± 0.006 |
| 6 |
| Day 7 | 0.19 ± 0.008 |
| 5 |
| Day 14 | 0.25 ± 0.022 |
| 5 |
Represented p values indicate the difference compared to the non-ischemic limb
NS non-significant, N the number of animals available for analysis
Fig. 2A typical representation of perfusion recovery as seen by 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT and muscular damage as seen by 99mTc-PyP SPECT. In all images, the lower part of the body is displayed in supine position. Image signal intensity is color-coded and relative to the injected dose per animal. Asterisk marks the ligated hind limb.
Overview of the average SUVs (±SEM) in the non-ischemic and ischemic hind limb and the average ratio (±SEM) calculated from SPECT scans in the 99mTc-sestamibi and 99mTc-PyP group per time point
| SPECT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99mTc-sestamibi group | |||||
| Time point | SUV non-ischemic | SUV ischemic ± SEM | Ratio ± SEM |
|
|
| Baseline | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | 0.97 ± 0.05 | NS | 7 |
| Post-operatively | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.54 ± 0.10 |
| 7 |
| Day 3 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.11 |
| 6 |
| Day 7 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.93 ± 0.10 | NS | 7 |
| Day 14 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.81 ± 0.05 |
| 7 |
| 99mTc-PyP group | |||||
| Time point | SUV non-ischemic | SUV ischemic | Ratio |
|
|
| Baseline | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.92 ± 0.04 | NS | 6 |
| Post-operatively | 0.15 ± 0.04 | 0.35 ± 0.17 | 3.08 ± 1.50 | NS | 6 |
| Day 3 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 4.93 ± 1.25 |
| 5 |
| Day 7 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.10 | 3.27 ± 0.19 |
| 5 |
| Day 14 | 0.16 ± 0.07 | 0.18 ± 0.06 | 1.21 ± 0.21 | NS | 3 |
Represented p values indicate the difference compared to the non-ischemic limb
NS non-significant, N the number of animals available for analysis
Fig. 4Increasing collateral diameter over time in ischemic adductor muscles. Representative pictures of collateral arteries are shown immediately after ligation (a) and at day 14 post ligation (b). Compared to the non-ischemic limb, a significant increase in collateral diameter was found at day 7 and 14 post ligation (c)
Fig. 5Monocyte/macrophage infiltration in the peri-muscular fascia over time. Panel a (non-ischemic) and b (ischemic) show representative images of the CD68 staining 3 days after ligation surgery. Significantly higher macrophage infiltration compared to the non-ischemic limb was found on day 3 (p < 0.001) (c). On all other days, no significant difference was found
Fig. 6DNA fragmentation detected by TUNEL staining in ischemic and non-ischemic adductor muscles. Panel a (non-ischemic) and b (ischemic) show representative images of the TUNEL staining 3 days after ligation surgery. Significantly higher TUNEL positivity in the ischemic limb compared to the non-ischemic limb was found on day 3 after ligation (p < 0.001) (c). On all other days, no significant difference was found