Literature DB >> 27230254

How Do Perceived Descriptive Norms Influence Indoor Tanning Intentions? An Application of the Theory of Normative Social Behavior.

Nick Carcioppolo1, Victoria Orrego Dunleavy1, Qinghua Yang2.   

Abstract

Indoor tanning bed use is highly influenced by perceived norms about a tanned appearance. The theory of normative social behavior (TNSB) details the many ways in which norms can impact intentions and behavior, but has never been assessed in the context of indoor tanning. Considering this, we conducted a survey among female university students (N = 274) to determine the extent to which the TNSB predicted intentions to use indoor tanning beds. Overall, the path model predicted about 46% of the variance in intentions, and the majority of significant indirect effects were witnessed through the outcome expectation variables included in the TNSB, suggesting that these may be the most salient mechanisms-as predicted by the TNSB-through which norms can impact tanning intentions. In light of these results, theoretical and practical implications are discussed, and specific recommendations are given to extend the predictive utility of the TNSB in the context of indoor tanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27230254      PMCID: PMC5278634          DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1120697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  35 in total

Review 1.  Optimistic biases about personal risks.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking: a replication failure.

Authors:  William DeJong; Shari Kessel Schneider; Laura Gomberg Towvim; Melissa J Murphy; Emily E Doerr; Neal R Simonsen; Karen E Mason; Richard A Scribner
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.716

3.  Peer crowd identification and indoor artificial UV tanning behavioral tendencies.

Authors:  Jerod Stapleton; Rob Turrisi; Joel Hillhouse
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2008-10

4.  Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods.

Authors:  David P Mackinnon; Chondra M Lockwood; Jason Williams
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  In-group rationalizations of risk and indoor tanning: A textual analysis of an online forum.

Authors:  Nick Carcioppolo; Elena V Chudnovskaya; Andrea Martinez Gonzalez; Tyler Stephan
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2014-12-30

6.  Use of sunscreen, sunburning rates, and tanning bed use among more than 10 000 US children and adolescents.

Authors:  Alan C Geller; Graham Colditz; Susan Oliveria; Karen Emmons; Cynthia Jorgensen; Gideon N Aweh; A Lindsay Frazier
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2011.

Authors:  Danice K Eaton; Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; Shari Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Joseph Hawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Connie Lim; Howell Wechsler
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2012-06-08

8.  A randomized controlled trial of an appearance-focused intervention to prevent skin cancer.

Authors:  Joel Hillhouse; Rob Turrisi; Jerod Stapleton; June Robinson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Patterns of indoor tanning use: implications for clinical interventions.

Authors:  Joel Hillhouse; Rob Turrisi; Alan L Shields
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2007-12

Review 10.  Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathieu Boniol; Philippe Autier; Peter Boyle; Sara Gandini
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-07-24
View more
  8 in total

1.  Friendly tanning: young adults' engagement with friends around indoor tanning.

Authors:  Vivian M Rodríguez; Casey L Daniel; Brooke Foucault Welles; Alan C Geller; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-02-08

2.  The relationship between social norms and sexual risk-reduction intentions and behavior among men who have sex with men: Findings from an eHealth intervention.

Authors:  Anne-Marie B Basaran; John L Christensen; Lynn Carol Miller; Paul Robert Appleby; Stephen J Read
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2019-05-09

3.  Appearance, Friends, and Feelings: A Two-Study Exploration of Young Women's Emotional Associations and Indoor Tanning Frequency.

Authors:  Jessica Fitts Willoughby; Jessica Gall Myrick; Jiayu Li
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2021-04-06

4.  Proof-of-Concept Feasibility Trial of a Dissonance-Based Sun Safety Intervention for Young Adult Tanners.

Authors:  Sherry L Pagoto; Molly E Waring; Laurie C Groshon; Aviana O Rosen; Matthew W Schroeder; Jared M Goetz
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2022-08-02

5.  Acculturation, Sun Tanning Behavior, and Tanning Attitudes Among Asian College Students in the Northeastern USA.

Authors:  Jennifer M Bowers; Jada G Hamilton; Yelena P Wu; Anne Moyer; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2021-05-04

6.  Persisting Effects of a Social Media Campaign to Prevent Indoor Tanning: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  David B Buller; Sherry Pagoto; Kimberly L Henry; Katie Baker; Barbara J Walkosz; Joel Hillhouse; Julia Berteletti; Jessica Bibeau; Alishia Kinsey
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.090

7.  The reduction in anemia through normative innovations (RANI) project: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial in Odisha, India.

Authors:  Hagere Yilma; Erica Sedlander; Rajiv N Rimal; Ichhya Pant; Ashita Munjral; Satyanarayan Mohanty
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Intentional tanning behaviors among undergraduates on the United States' Gulf Coast.

Authors:  Casey L Daniel; Natalie R Gassman; Alyssa M Fernandez; Sejong Bae; Marcus C B Tan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.