BACKGROUND: Skin cancer represents a significant health threat with over 1.3 million diagnoses, 8000 melanoma deaths, and more than $1 billion spent annually for skin cancer healthcare in the US. Despite findings from laboratory, case-control, and prospective studies that indicate a link between youthful indoor tanning (IT) and skin cancer, IT is increasing among US youth. Appearance-focused interventions represent a promising method to counteract these trends. METHODS: A total of 430 female indoor tanners were randomized into intervention or no intervention control conditions. Intervention participants received an appearance-focused booklet based on decision-theoretical models of health behavior. Outcome variables included self-reports of IT behavior and intentions, as well as measures of cognitive mediating variables. RESULTS: Normative increases in springtime IT rates were significantly lower (ie, over 35%) at 6-month follow-up in intervention versus control participants with similar reductions in future intentions. Mediation analyses revealed 6 cognitive variables (IT attitudes, fashion attitudes, perceived susceptibility to skin cancer and skin damage, subjective norms, and image norms) that significantly mediated change in IT behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance-focused intervention demonstrated strong effects on IT behavior and intentions in young indoor tanners. Appearance-focused approaches to skin cancer prevention need to present alternative behaviors as well as alter IT attitudes. Mediational results provide guides for strengthening future appearance-focused interventions directed at behaviors that increase risk of skin cancer. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Skin cancer represents a significant health threat with over 1.3 million diagnoses, 8000 melanoma deaths, and more than $1 billion spent annually for skin cancer healthcare in the US. Despite findings from laboratory, case-control, and prospective studies that indicate a link between youthful indoor tanning (IT) and skin cancer, IT is increasing among US youth. Appearance-focused interventions represent a promising method to counteract these trends. METHODS: A total of 430 female indoor tanners were randomized into intervention or no intervention control conditions. Intervention participants received an appearance-focused booklet based on decision-theoretical models of health behavior. Outcome variables included self-reports of IT behavior and intentions, as well as measures of cognitive mediating variables. RESULTS: Normative increases in springtime IT rates were significantly lower (ie, over 35%) at 6-month follow-up in intervention versus control participants with similar reductions in future intentions. Mediation analyses revealed 6 cognitive variables (IT attitudes, fashion attitudes, perceived susceptibility to skin cancer and skin damage, subjective norms, and image norms) that significantly mediated change in IT behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance-focused intervention demonstrated strong effects on IT behavior and intentions in young indoor tanners. Appearance-focused approaches to skin cancer prevention need to present alternative behaviors as well as alter IT attitudes. Mediational results provide guides for strengthening future appearance-focused interventions directed at behaviors that increase risk of skin cancer. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society
Authors: Katie Brooks; Daniel Brooks; Zeina Dajani; Susan M Swetter; Erin Powers; Sherry Pagoto; Alan C Geller Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Alan C Geller; Graham Colditz; Susan Oliveria; Karen Emmons; Cynthia Jorgensen; Gideon N Aweh; A Lindsay Frazier Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Carolyn J Heckman; Sharon L Manne; Jacqueline D Kloss; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Bradley Collins; Stuart R Lessin Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2011-11
Authors: Richard Bränström; Nadine A Kasparian; Yu-mei Chang; Paul Affleck; Aad Tibben; Lisa G Aspinwall; Esther Azizi; Orna Baron-Epel; Linda Battistuzzi; Wilma Bergman; William Bruno; May Chan; Francisco Cuellar; Tadeusz Debniak; Dace Pjanova; Slawomir Ertmanski; Adina Figl; Melinda Gonzalez; Nicholas K Hayward; Marko Hocevar; Peter A Kanetsky; Sancy A Leachman; Olita Heisele; Jane Palmer; Barbara Peric; Susana Puig; Dirk Schadendorf; Nelleke A Gruis; Julia Newton-Bishop; Yvonne Brandberg Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Carolyn J Heckman; Fang Zhu; Sharon L Manne; Jacqueline D Kloss; Bradley N Collins; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Stuart R Lessin Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2012-07-27
Authors: Jerod L Stapleton; Sharon L Manne; Katie Darabos; Kathryn Greene; Anne E Ray; Amber L Turner; Elliot J Coups Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.267