Literature DB >> 35064063

Persisting Effects of a Social Media Campaign to Prevent Indoor Tanning: A Randomized Trial.

David B Buller1, Sherry Pagoto2, Kimberly L Henry3, Katie Baker4, Barbara J Walkosz1, Joel Hillhouse4, Julia Berteletti1, Jessica Bibeau2, Alishia Kinsey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A social media campaign for mothers aimed at reducing indoor tanning (IT) by adolescent daughters reduced mothers' permissiveness toward IT in an immediate posttest. Whether the effects persisted at 6 months after the campaign remains to be determined.
METHODS: Mothers (N = 869) of daughters ages 14-17 in 34 states without bans on IT by minors were enrolled in a randomized trial. All mothers received an adolescent health campaign over 12 months with posts on preventing IT (intervention) or prescription drug misuse (control). Mothers completed a follow-up at 18 months post-randomization measuring IT permissiveness, attitudes, intentions, communication, and behavior, and support for state bans. Daughters (n = 469; 54.0%) just completed baseline and follow-up surveys.
RESULTS: Structural equation modeling showed that intervention-group mothers were less permissive of IT by daughters [unstandardized coefficient, -0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.31 to -0.03], had greater self-efficacy to refuse daughter's IT requests (0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.29) and lower IT intentions themselves (-0.18; 95% CI, -0.35 to -0.01), and were more supportive of bans on IT by minors (0.23; 95% CI, 0.02-0.43) than control-group mothers. Intervention-group daughters expressed less positive IT attitudes than controls (-0.16; 95% CI, 0.31 to -0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The social media campaign may have had a persisting effect of convincing mothers to withhold permission for daughters to indoor tan for 6 months after its conclusion. Reduced IT intentions and increased support for bans on IT by minors also persisted among mothers. IMPACT: Social media may increase support among mothers to place more restrictions on IT by minors. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35064063      PMCID: PMC8983451          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  43 in total

1.  The effect of initial indoor tanning with mother on current tanning patterns.

Authors:  Mary Kate Baker; Joel James Hillhouse; Xuefeng Liu
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2010-12

2.  Indoor tanning use among adolescents in the US, 1998 to 2004.

Authors:  Vilma Cokkinides; Martin Weinstock; DeAnn Lazovich; Elizabeth Ward; Michael Thun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Adolescents' perceptions of communication with parents relative to specific aspects of relationships with parents and personal development.

Authors:  S Jackson; J Bijstra; L Oostra; H Bosma
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  1998-06

Review 4.  Indoor tanning prevalence after the International Agency for Research on Cancer statement on carcinogenicity of artificial tanning devices: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A J Rodriguez-Acevedo; A C Green; C Sinclair; E van Deventer; L G Gordon
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  A Social Networks Approach to Understanding Vaccine Conversations on Twitter: Network Clusters, Sentiment, and Certainty in HPV Social Networks.

Authors:  Itai Himelboim; Xizhu Xiao; Danielle Ka Lai Lee; Meredith Y Wang; Porismita Borah
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2019-06-14

6.  The sunless study: a beach randomized trial of a skin cancer prevention intervention promoting sunless tanning.

Authors:  Sherry L Pagoto; Kristin L Schneider; Jessica Oleski; Jamie S Bodenlos; Yunsheng Ma
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2010-09

7.  Examination of the short-term efficacy of a parent-based intervention to prevent skin cancer.

Authors:  Rob Turrisi; Joel Hillhouse; Sarah Heavin; June Robinson; Malissa Adams; Jessica Berry
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-08

8.  An intervention to decrease adolescent indoor tanning: a multi-method pilot study.

Authors:  DeAnn Lazovich; Kelvin Choi; Cheri Rolnick; Jody M Jackson; Jean Forster; Brian Southwell
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  State Indoor Tanning Laws and Prevalence of Indoor Tanning Among US High School Students, 2009-2015.

Authors:  Jin Qin; Dawn M Holman; Sherry Everett Jones; Zahava Berkowitz; Gery P Guy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Parent and child perspectives on family interactions related to melanoma risk and prevention after CDKN2A/p16 testing of minor children.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Bridget Parsons; Tammy K Stump; Katy Nottingham; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-01-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  The Effects of Embedded Skin Cancer Interventions on Sun-Safety Attitudes and Attention Paid to Tan Women on Instagram.

Authors:  Jessica Gall Myrick; Katja Anne Waldron; Olivia Cohen; Carlina DiRusso; Ruosi Shao; Eugene Cho; Jessica Fitts Willoughby; Rob Turrisi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-08

2.  Promoting Social Distancing and COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions to Mothers: Randomized Comparison of Information Sources in Social Media Messages.

Authors:  David Buller; Barbara Walkosz; Kimberly Henry; W Gill Woodall; Sherry Pagoto; Julia Berteletti; Alishia Kinsey; Joseph Divito; Katie Baker; Joel Hillhouse
Journal:  JMIR Infodemiology       Date:  2022-08-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.