Literature DB >> 27217695

Minimally invasive surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Our experience and review of the literature.

Koichi Suda1, Masaya Nakauchi1, Kazuki Inaba1, Yoshinori Ishida1, Ichiro Uyama1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, characterized by minimal access, has been increasingly performed worldwide. It not only results in better cosmetic outcomes, but also reduces intraoperative blood loss and postoperative pain, leading to faster recovery; however, endoscopically enhanced anatomy and improved hemostasis via positive intracorporeal pressure generated by CO2 insufflation have not contributed to reduction in early postoperative complications or improvement in long-term outcomes. Since 1995, we have been actively using MIS for operable patients with resectable upper GI cancer and have developed stable and robust methodology in conducting totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer and prone thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using novel technology including da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS). We have recently demonstrated that use of DVSS might reduce postoperative local complications including pancreatic fistula after gastrectomy and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after esophagectomy. In this article, we present the current status and future perspectives on MIS for gastric and esophageal cancer based on our experience and a review of the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal neoplasms; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Postoperative complications; Robotic surgical procedures; Stomach neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27217695      PMCID: PMC4870070          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  104 in total

1.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Arnold Radtke; Thomas J Musholt; Stephan Timm; Andreas Rink; Achilleas Tsiamis; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position.

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Chang Young Lee; Jin-Gu Lee; Seok Jin Haam; In-Kyu Park; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Prognosis of metastatic splenic hilum lymph node in patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy and splenectomy.

Authors:  Keishiro Aoyagi; Kikuo Kouhuji; Motoshi Miyagi; Takuya Imaizumi; Junya Kizaki; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2010-02-27

4.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy--Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501.

Authors:  Takeshi Sano; Mitsuru Sasako; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Atsushi Nashimoto; Akira Kurita; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Taira Kinoshita; Kuniyoshi Arai; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Kunio Okajima
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masaya Nakauchi; Koichi Suda; Shibasaki Susumu; Shinichi Kadoya; Kazuki Inaba; Yoshinori Ishida; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  C Anderson; M Hellan; K Kernstine; J Ellenhorn; L Lai; V Trisal; A Pigazzi
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.547

8.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  P C van der Sluis; J P Ruurda; R J J Verhage; S van der Horst; L Haverkamp; P D Siersema; I H M Borel Rinkes; F J W Ten Kate; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  10 in total

1.  Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hirokazu Noshiro; Shuji Takiguchi; Kazuhisa Ehara; Kazutaka Obama; Shiro Kuwabara; Hiroshi Okabe; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  [Anesthesia management in robotic-assisted esophagectomy with triple incisions: analysis of 53 cases].

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Liu; Tian-Hua Zhang; Jing Cheng; Hui-Ting Li; Long-Hui Cao; Zi-Hui Tan; Wen-Qian Lin
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-05-20

3.  Outermost layer-oriented medial approach for infrapyloric nodal dissection in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Susumu Shibasaki; Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Tetsuya Nakamura; Shinichi Kadoya; Kenji Kikuchi; Kazuki Inaba; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy using double flap technique following proximal gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Susumu Shibasaki; Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Kenji Kikuchi; Shinichi Kadoya; Yoshinori Ishida; Kazuki Inaba; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: technical aspects and surgical, nutritional and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Masaya Nakauchi; Koichi Suda; Kenichi Nakamura; Susumu Shibasaki; Kenji Kikuchi; Tetsuya Nakamura; Shinichi Kadoya; Yoshinori Ishida; Kazuki Inaba; Keizo Taniguchi; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Feasibility and nutritional impact of laparoscopic assisted tailored subtotal gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Peng Jin; Fu-Hai Ma; Shuai Ma; Yi-Bin Xie; Yang Li; Wei-Kun Li; Wen-Zhe Kang; Yan-Tao Tian
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Improvement of surgical complications using single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation and artificial carbon dioxide pneumothorax in esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Hao Chuang; Hsing-Hua Lai; Yu Chen; Li-Chun Chen; Hung-I Lu; Yen-Hao Chen; Shau-Hsuan Li; Chien-Ming Lo
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Ten years of IRCAD, Barretos, SP, Brazil.

Authors:  Eduardo Crema; Armando Geraldo Franchini Melani; Luís Gustavo Capochin Romagnolo; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 1.564

9.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway optimizes outcomes and costs for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ying Xu; Ao Liu; Lu Chen; Hai Huang; Yi Gao; Chuanjie Zhang; Yang Xu; Da Huang; Danfeng Xu; Min Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Comparison of prognostic impact of anatomic location of the pancreas on postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic and open gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jun Kinoshita; Takahisa Yamaguchi; Hiroto Saito; Hideki Moriyama; Mari Shimada; Shiro Terai; Koichi Okamoto; Shinichi Nakanuma; Isamu Makino; Keishi Nakamura; Hidehiro Tajima; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.067

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.