Literature DB >> 21160977

Prognosis of metastatic splenic hilum lymph node in patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy and splenectomy.

Keishiro Aoyagi1, Kikuo Kouhuji, Motoshi Miyagi, Takuya Imaizumi, Junya Kizaki, Kazuo Shirouzu.   

Abstract

AIM: To clarify the significance of combined resection of the spleen to dissect the No. 10 lymph node (LN).
METHODS: We studied 191 patients who had undergone total gastrectomy with splenectomy, excluding non-curative cases, resection of multiple gastric cancer, and those with remnant stomach cancer. Various clinicopathological factors were evaluated for any independent contributions to No. 10 LN metastasis, using χ(2) test. Significant factors were extracted for further analysis, carried out using a logistic regression method. Furthermore, lymph node metastasis was evaluated for any independent contribution to No. 10 LN metastasis, using the same methods. The cumulative survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The significance of any difference between the survival curves was determined using the Cox-Mantel test, and any difference was considered significant at the 5% level.
RESULTS: From the variables considered to be potentially associated with No. 10 LN metastasis, age, depth, invasion of lymph vessel, N factor, the number of lymph node metastasis, Stage, the number of sites, and location were found to differ significantly between those with metastasis (the Positive Group) and those without (the Negative Group). A logistic regression analysis showed that the localization and Stage were significant parameters for No. 10 LN metastasis. There was no case located on the lesser curvature in the Positive Group. The numbers of No. 2, No. 3, No. 4sa, No. 4sb, No. 4d, No. 7, and No. 11 LN metastasis were each found to differ significantly between the Positive Group and the Negative Group. A logistic regression analysis showed that No. 4sa, No. 4sb, and No. 11 LN metastasis were each a significant parameter for No. 10 LN metastasis. There was no significant difference in survival curves between the Positive Group and the Negative Group.
CONCLUSION: Splenectomy should be performed to dissect No. 10 LN for cases which have No. 4sa, No. 4sb or No. 11 LN metastasis. However, in cases where the tumor is located on the lesser curvature, splenectomy can be omitted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Lymph node metastasis; Lymphadenectomy, Splenectomy; Total gastrectomy

Year:  2010        PMID: 21160977      PMCID: PMC2998958          DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i2.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Hepatol


  16 in total

1.  Complications following D3 gastrectomy: post hoc analysis of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Chew-Wun Wu; I-Shou Chang; Su-shun Lo; Mao-Chin Hsieh; Jen-Hao Chen; Wing-Yiu Lui; Jacqueline Whang-Peng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Indications for pancreaticosplenectomy in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  K Chikara; S Hiroshi; N Masato; A Hirotoshi; M Goro; O Hidetaka
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 May-Jun

3.  Indication of splenectomy for gastric carcinoma involving the proximal part of the stomach.

Authors:  T Sakaguchi; H Sawada; Y Yamada; H Fujimoto; K Emoto; T Takayama; M Ueno; Y Nakajima
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Status of extended lymph node dissection: locoregional control is the only way to survive gastric cancer.

Authors:  Henk H Hartgrink; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  A prospective randomized study comparing D2 total gastrectomy versus D2 total gastrectomy plus splenectomy in 187 patients with gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Attila Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Jorge Rojas; Italo Braghetto; Juan Carlos Diaz; Fernando Maluenda
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Adenocarcinoma of the gastric antrum: does D2 total gastrectomy with splenectomy improve prognosis compared to D1 subtotal gastrectomy? A long-term survival analysis with emphasis on Lauren classification.

Authors:  D Roukos; A Schmidt-Mathiesen; A Encke
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.279

7.  Lymph node metastasis at the splenic hilum in proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masahide Ikeguchi; Nobuaki Kaibara
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Association of splenectomy with postoperative complications in patients with proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Authors:  Jürgen Weitz; David P Jaques; Murray Brennan; Martin Karpeh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Postoperative morbidity/mortality and survival rates after total gastrectomy, with splenectomy/pancreaticosplenectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Manabu Yamamoto; Hideo Baba; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Kazuya Endo; Yasuharu Ikeda; Yasushi Toh; Shunji Kohnoe; Takeshi Okamura; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

10.  Total gastrectomy with simultaneous pancreaticosplenectomy or splenectomy in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  E Otsuji; T Yamaguchi; K Sawai; K Okamoto; T Takahashi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  16 in total

1.  Technical aspects and short- and long-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a single-institution retrospective study.

Authors:  Masaya Nakauchi; Koichi Suda; Shinichi Kadoya; Kazuki Inaba; Yoshinori Ishida; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Early results of a modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer with stage cT1-2: a case-control study.

Authors:  Guoxian Guan; Weizhong Jiang; Zhifen Chen; Xing Liu; Huishan Lu; Xiangfu Zhang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy in 108 consecutive patients with upper gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ping Li; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Yi Wang; Qi-Yue Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The Role of No. 10 Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Patients Without Metastasis to No. 4sa and No. 4sb Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Shibo Bian; Hongqing Xi; Xiaosong Wu; Jianxin Cui; Liangang Ma; Rong Chen; Bo Wei; Lin Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Clinical Significance of Splenic Hilar Dissection with Splenectomy in Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: An Analysis at a Single Institution in Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Watanabe; Takahiro Kinoshita; Naoki Enomoto; Hidehito Shibasaki; Toshirou Nishida
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A preoperatively predictive difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: experience from a large-scale single center.

Authors:  Ping Li; Chang-Ming Huang; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Rui Fu Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Minimally invasive surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Our experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Kazuki Inaba; Yoshinori Ishida; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The significance of splenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Atsushi Nashimoto; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Atsushi Matsuki
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-21

9.  A 346 case analysis for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection for proximal gastric cancer: a single center study.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Jun-Rong Zhang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Metastasis, risk factors and prognostic significance of splenic hilar lymph nodes in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Chen; Kun Yang; Wei-Han Zhang; Xin-Zu Chen; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Jia-Ping Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.