Literature DB >> 28364148

Robotic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy using double flap technique following proximal gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes.

Susumu Shibasaki1, Koichi Suda2,3, Masaya Nakauchi1, Kenji Kikuchi1, Shinichi Kadoya1, Yoshinori Ishida1, Kazuki Inaba1, Ichiro Uyama1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by double flap technique (VEG-DFT) is a promising procedure to prevent reflux after proximal gastrectomy (PG), and is achieved by the burial of the abdominal esophagus into the gastric submucosa; however, laparoscopic VEG-DFT is technically demanding due to complicated suturing and ligation maneuvers. The present study was designed to determine the feasibility and safety of robotic VEG-DFT.
METHODS: After robotic PG, seromuscular flaps were extracorporeally created at the anterior wall of the remnant stomach through a small umbilical incision. Then, using a robot, the posterior wall of the esophagus was fixed to the cranial end of the mucosal window, and layer-to-layer sutures were placed between the anterior aspects of esophagus and the remnant stomach. Finally, the anastomosis was covered by seromuscular flaps. Short-term outcomes of 12 consecutive patients who underwent VEG-DFT between January 2014 and December 2015 were assessed.
RESULTS: Operations were successfully completed using robotic assistance in all patients. Median operative, surgeon console, and anastomosis times were 406 (324-613 min), 267 (214-483), and 104 (76-186) min, respectively, and median estimated blood loss was 31 (5-130) ml. The first six cases were required to reach a learning plateau. Both mortality and morbidity rates within 30 days after surgery were 0%. Postoperative hospital stay was 10 (9-30) days. No postoperative reflux esophagitis was observed, whereas anastomotic stenosis, which required endoscopic balloon dilation, developed in three patients (25%) in postoperative month 2. There was a significant association between the total number of stitches used for VEG-DFT and anastomotic stenosis (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assistance may be useful for VEG-DFT with a short learning curve. Attention is required to prevent postoperative anastomotic stenosis possibly caused by an excessive number of stitches for esophagogastrostomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fundoplication; Gastrectomy; Robotic surgical procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28364148     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5489-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of ghrelin in the field of surgery.

Authors:  Shuji Takiguchi; Kohei Murakami; Yoshitomo Yanagimoto; Akihiro Takata; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  A Novel Technique of Anti-reflux Esophagogastrostomy Following Left Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy for Carcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction.

Authors:  Shinji Mine; Souya Nunobe; Masayuki Watanabe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Esophagogastrostomy reconstruction after limited proximal gastrectomy.

Authors:  D Ichikawa; Y Ueshima; K Shirono; K Kan; Y Shioaki; C J Lee; T Hamashima; E Deguchi; E Ikeda; F Mutoh; T Oka; H Kurioka
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

4.  Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Junfeng Zhou; Yan Shi; Feng Qian; Bo Tang; Yingxue Hao; Yongliang Zhao; Peiwu Yu
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Mariko Man-I; Yoshinori Ishida; Yuichiro Kawamura; Seiji Satoh; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Double-Flap Technique as an Antireflux Procedure in Esophagogastrostomy after Proximal Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Shinji Kuroda; Masahiko Nishizaki; Satoru Kikuchi; Kazuhiro Noma; Shunsuke Tanabe; Shunsuke Kagawa; Yasuhiro Shirakawa; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Yoshinori Ishida; Yuichiro Kawamura; Kazuki Inaba; Seiichiro Kanaya; Satoshi Teramukai; Seiji Satoh; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach.

Authors:  M Kojima; H Hosoda; Y Date; M Nakazato; H Matsuo; K Kangawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Norio Shiraishi; Yosuke Adachi; Seigo Kitano; Kenji Kakisako; Masafumi Inomata; Kazuhiro Yasuda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masaya Nakauchi; Koichi Suda; Shibasaki Susumu; Shinichi Kadoya; Kazuki Inaba; Yoshinori Ishida; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  7 in total

1.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparisons of Postoperative Complications and Nutritional Status After Proximal Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Esophagogastrostomy and Double-Tract Reconstruction.

Authors:  Wataru Miyauchi; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Yuji Shishido; Kozo Miyatani; Takehiko Hanaki; Kyoichi Kihara; Manabu Yamamoto; Naruo Tokuyasu; Shuichi Takano; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Soichiro Honjo; Hiroaki Saito; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 1.641

3.  Muscle mass ratio in male gastric cancer patients as an independent predictor of postoperative complications after minimally invasive distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Gaku Inaguma; Susumu Shibasaki; Masaya Nakauchi; Akiko Serizawa; Kenichi Nakamura; Shingo Akimoto; Tanaka Tsuyoshi; Kazuki Inaba; Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Modified side overlap esophagogastrostomy after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yoshito Yamashita; Taichi Tatsubayashi; Koichi Okumura; Takumi Miyamoto; Kohei Ueno
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2022-01-21

5.  Impact of routine preoperative sonographic screening with early intervention for deep venous thrombosis in lower extremities on preventing postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with gastric cancer scheduled for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Kazumitsu Suzuki; Susumu Shibasaki; Masaya Nakauchi; Kenichi Nakamura; Shingo Akimoto; Tsuyoshi Tanaka; Kenji Kikuchi; Kazuki Inaba; Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-flap technique as antireflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy (rD-FLAP Study).

Authors:  Shinji Kuroda; Yasuhiro Choda; Shinya Otsuka; Satoshi Ueyama; Norimitsu Tanaka; Atsushi Muraoka; Shinji Hato; Toshikazu Kimura; Kohji Tanakaya; Satoru Kikuchi; Shunsuke Tanabe; Kazuhiro Noma; Masahiko Nishizaki; Shunsuke Kagawa; Yasuhiro Shirakawa; Yasuaki Kamikawa; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-10-11

7.  Study on the Effect of Different Endoscopic Auxiliary Treatment of Gastric Mucosal Microtumor.

Authors:  Xiongping Zhong; Fuqun Wang; Dehui Zeng; Yijin Chen; Shengbing Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 2.650

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.