| Literature DB >> 27217608 |
Sara Keshtgar1, Farideh Iravanpour2, Behrooz Gharesi-Fard3, Marjaneh Kazerooni4.
Abstract
The freezing and thawing process not only is associated with serious damage to sperm such as damage to the plasma membrane and the acrosomal membrane but also changes the membrane permeability to some ions including calcium. Also, the generation of oxygen free radicals is increased during the freezing-thawing process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate of the effects of Trolox as an antioxidant and edetic acid (EDTA) as a calcium chelator on frozen-thawed (FT) sperm and compare these effects with those on fresh sperm. This study was done on these men of 25 healthy men, who referred to Shiraz Infertility Centerbetween2012 and2013. Normal samples were transferred to the ReproductivePhysiology Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz. The samples were divided into two groups randomly: fresh and FT sperm groups. Each group was divided into five subgroups: control group, the solvent group (0.1%dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]), Trolox group (200μM), EDTA group (1.1mM), and Trolox+EDTA group. The percentages of motility, viability, and acrosome-reacted sperm were tested. The percentages of motility and viability in the FT sperm were lower than those in the fresh sperm. The progressive motility of the FT sperm was improved nonsignificantly with Trolox+EDTA. However, the effect of Trolox+EDTA on the progressive motility of the FT sperm was much more than that on the fresh sperm. The fewest acrosome-reacted sperm were observed in the EDTA-containingFT sperm. Antioxidant supplementation or omission of extracellular calcium may partly improve motility and also reduce acrosomal damage in FT sperm.Entities:
Keywords: 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid; Acrosome reaction; Edetic acid; Freezing; Sperm motility
Year: 2016 PMID: 27217608 PMCID: PMC4876302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Med Sci ISSN: 0253-0716
Analysis of the selected semen samples
| Semen characteristics | Mean±standard error | |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh group (n, 13) | Frozen-thawed group (n, 12) | |
| Semen volume (mL) | 4.0±0.4 | 3.2±0.3 |
| pH | 7.8±0.07 | 7.8±0.07 |
| Sperm concentration (×106/mL) | 107.6±12.6 | 125±12 |
| Total sperm count (×106) | 438.6±74.7 | 374.5±38.7 |
| Progressive motility (%) | 41.8±3.1 | 40.7±3.4 |
| Nonprogressive motility (%) | 14.8±1.8 | 12.9±1.6 |
| Immotile sperm (%) | 43.4±3.2 | 46.4±2.3 |
| Abnormal sperm morphology (%) | 52.1±1.4 | 48.7±2.1 |
| Viability (%) | 57.1±1.2 | 57.9±1.9 |
| Viscosity | Normal | Normal |
Motility of the fresh and FT sperm in different experimental subgroups after 1 hour’s incubation andchanges (%) in progressive motility relative to the control group under treatment with Trolox and EDTA
| Group Motility(%) | Mean±standard error | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | DMSO | Trolox | EDTA | Trolox+EDTA | |
| Fresh (N, 13) | |||||
| Progressive motility | 77.0±2.9 | 75.3±3.6 | 78.6±2.7 | 76.3±2.6 | 76.3±2.0 |
| Total motility | 92.8±1.1 | 91.8±1.5 | 93.5±1.3 | 91.7±0.9 | 90.1±1.3 |
| Change in progressive motility (%) | 100 | 98.4±3.9 | 102.6±2.9 | 100.4±4.4 | 100.3±4.2 |
| FT (N, 12) | |||||
| Progressive motility | 16.5±2.2[ | 14.3±2.8[ | 17.8±2.6[ | 21.4±2.8[ | 23.4±2.3[ |
| Total motility | 38.4±3.9[ | 39.8±5.3[ | 42.4±4.6[ | 41.3±3.5[ | 44.6±3[ |
| Change in progressive motility (%) | 100 | 108.6±28.2 | 115.6±16.2 | 157±29.6 | 184.5±37[ |
Significant difference relative to fresh sperm under similar treatment (P<0.005); FT: Frozen-thawed; EDTA: Edetic acid; DMSO: Dimethyl sulfoxide
Viability of the fresh and FT sperm under treatment with EDTA and Trolox
| Subgroups Live sperm (%) | Mean±standard error | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | DMSO | Trolox | EDTA | Trolox+EDTA | |
| Fresh sperm (N, 13) | 91.8±1.2 | 91±1.3 | 94.4±1 | 91±0.8 | 90.1±1.4 |
| FT sperm (N, 12) | 44.0±3.4[ | 47.6±2.6[ | 44.4±4.7[ | 45.9±4.0[ | 47.4±3.3[ |
Significant difference relative to fresh sperm under similar treatment (P<0.005); FT: Frozen-thawed; EDTA: Edetic acid; DMSO: Dimethyl sulfoxide
Acrosomal reaction in the fresh and FT sperm under treatment with EDTA and Troloxt
| Groups Acrosome reaction (%) | Mean±standard error (N, 5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Trolox | EDTA | Trolox+ EDTA | |
| Fresh | 8.3±1.9 | 5.7±0.6 | 5.4±0.6 | 5.6±1.4 |
| FT | 83.4±3.2[ | 80.08±3.3[ | 64.6±2.7[ | 63.9±4[ |
Significant difference relative to fresh sperm under similar treatment (P<0.005);
Significant difference relative to EDTA-containing groups (P<0.02); FT: Frozen-thawed; EDTA: Edetic acid