| Literature DB >> 32546885 |
Bahareh Ebrahimi1, Sara Keshtgar1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sperm cryopreservation-thawing process has damaging effects on the structure and function of sperm, namely cryoinjury. Calcium overload has been reported as a postulated mechanism for sperm damage during the first steps after thawing. This study was designed to assess the intracellular calcium (Ca2+ i) after cryopreservation and to clarify the role of a calcium chelator ethylene glycol-bis (2-aminoethyl ether)-N, N, N', N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) on human sperm quality.Entities:
Keywords: Calcium ; Cryopreservation ; Egtazic acid; Spermatozoa
Year: 2020 PMID: 32546885 PMCID: PMC7253491 DOI: 10.30476/ijms.2019.45787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Med Sci ISSN: 0253-0716
Effect of EGTA on sperm kinematics of fresh and cryopreserved-thawed
| Groups | Progressive | Non-Progressive | Immotile | VCL | VSL | VAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SEM | Motility (%) | Motility (%) | (%) | (µm/sec) | (µm/sec) | (µm/sec) |
| Fresh | ||||||
| Control | 72.84±0.6 | 6.12±0.92 | 21.04±1.2 | 117.93±6.9 | 87.11±3.5 | 101.48±3.9 |
| EGTA | 46.20±3.1 | 3.55±0.62 | 49.23±3.5 | 96.02±5.3 | 66.95±4.6 | 72.30±5.0 |
| Cryopreserved-Thawed | ||||||
| Control | 36.97±0.6 | 3.78±0.51 | 59.24±1.0 | 107.02±5.4 | 66.68±4.3 | 67.20±5.0 |
| EGTA | 30.71±0.9 | 4.12±0.56 | 65.00±1.2 | 81.49±2.3 | 55.64±3.1 | 57.05±3.1 |
Curvilinear Velocity (VCL, µm/s), Straight Line Velocity (VSL, µm/s), Average Path Velocity (VAP, µm/s), and ethylene glycol-bis (2-aminoethyl ether)-N, N, N′, N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA). ANOVA test was used to compare each variable between the experimental groups.
Significant difference with the related control group (P=0.05),
significant difference between fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm (P<0.0001). Results are expressed as mean±SEM
Figure 1The graph represents the effect of EGTA on membrane integrity of fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm. ANOVA test was used to compare the membrane integrity between the experimental groups; #Significant difference between fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm (P<0.0001). Results are expressed as mean±SEM.
Figure 2The graph represents the effect of EGTA on the ROS production offresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm. ANOVA test was used to compare ROS production between the experimental groups; *Significant difference with the related control group (P<0.0001), #Significant difference between the fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm (P=0.01). Results are expressed as mean±SEM.
Figure 3The graph represents the effect of EGTA on the apoptotic rate of fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the viability and mortality rate between experimental groups. Flow cytometric analysis of EGTA-treated and untreated fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm stained with AnnexinV-FITC and PI; (Q1) necrotic cells (Annexin-V (-)/PI (+)), (Q2) late apoptotic cells (Annexin-V (+)/PI (+)), (Q3) early apoptotic cells (Annexin-V (+)/PI (-)), and (Q4) viable cells (Annexin-V (-)/PI (-)). (B) Stacked bar of sperm apoptosis in fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm and the effect of EGTA on them. *Significant difference with the related control group (P=0.05), #Significant difference between the fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm, (P=0.05). Results are expressed as mean±SEM.
Effect of EGTA on intracellular calcium of fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm
| Groups | Fluo3-AM-, | Fluo3-AM+, | Fluo3-AM+, | Fluo3-AM-, | MFI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PI+ (%) | PI+ (%) | PI- (%) | PI- (%) | ||
| Fresh | |||||
| Control | 20.6 ±6.5 | 6.24±1.78 | 63.24±8.17 | 9.85±3.36 | 302.4±62.08 |
| EGTA | 30.96±7.6 | 1.66±.88 | 22.66±13.88 | 44.72±12.23 | 51.16±20.78 |
| Cryopreserved-Thawed | |||||
| Control | 70.81±4.6 | 3.76±1.19 | 13.87±3.95 | 11.54±1.08 | 57.01±9.70 |
| EGTA | 60.78±9.5 | 2.33±.56 | 14.32±2.38 | 22.58±9.78 | 42.18±7.97 |
Dead cells with low Ca2+i (Fluo3-AM--PI+), dead cells with high Ca2+i (Fluo3-AM+-PI+), live cells with high Ca2+i (Fluo3-AM+- PI-), live cells with low Ca2+i (Fluo3-AM--PI-), mean fluorescent intensity (MFI), and ethylene glycol-bis (2-aminoethyl ether)-N, N, N′, N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA). Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare intracellular calcium between the experimental groups.
Significant difference with the related control group (P=0.01),
Significant difference between the fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm (P<0.0001). Results are expressed as mean±SEM
Effect of EGTA on the mitochondrial membrane potential of fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm
| Groups | Aggregate JC-1 (Red, %) | Monomer JC-1 (Green, %) | Red/Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh | |||
| Control | 1124±187.4 | 650.0±76.0 | 1.79±0.26 |
| EGTA | 919.5±216.6 | 557.8±71.0 | 1.61±0.26 |
| Cryopreserved-Thawed | |||
| Control | 709.0±186.5 | 1080±122.6 | 0.62±0.80 |
| EGTA | 1112±153.3 | 797.5±282.8 | 0.69±0.13 |
Ethylene glycol-bis (2-aminoethyl ether)-N, N, N′, N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA). Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare mitochondrial membrane potential between the experimental groups.
Significant difference between the fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm (P=0.05). Results are expressed as mean±SEM
Figure 4The graph represents the effect of EGTA on intracellular ATP of fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sperm. Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare intracellular ATP between the experimental groups. *Significant difference with related control group (P=0.01). Results are expressed as mean±SEM.