E T Donnelly1, N McClure, S E Lewis. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland. e.donnelly@qub.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate effects of cryopreservation on sperm motility and DNA integrity. DESIGN: Pre-cryopreservation and post-cryopreservation analysis of motility and DNA integrity of semen and prepared sperm samples. SETTING: A hospital andrology laboratory. PATIENT(S): Forty men attending the Regional Fertility Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland. INTERVENTION(S): Each sample was divided, and an aliquot was frozen unprepared. Remaining aliquots were prepared by Percoll density centrifugation (95.0:47.5) or direct swim-up procedure and divided into aliquots to allow direct comparison of fresh and frozen semen and prepared sperm (frozen with or without the addition of seminal plasma) from the same ejaculate. Samples were frozen by static-phase vapor cooling and being plunged into liquid nitrogen. Thawing was carried out at room temperature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sperm DNA integrity was determined using a modified alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay, and motility was determined using computer-assisted semen analysis. RESULT(S): Sperm frozen unprepared in seminal fluid appeared more resistant to freezing damage than frozen prepared sperm. Further improvements can be achieved by selecting out the subpopulation of sperm with best motility and DNA integrity and freezing these sperm in seminal plasma, making this the optimal procedure. CONCLUSION(S): Freezing sperm in seminal plasma improves postthaw motility and DNA integrity.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate effects of cryopreservation on sperm motility and DNA integrity. DESIGN: Pre-cryopreservation and post-cryopreservation analysis of motility and DNA integrity of semen and prepared sperm samples. SETTING: A hospital andrology laboratory. PATIENT(S): Forty men attending the Regional Fertility Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland. INTERVENTION(S): Each sample was divided, and an aliquot was frozen unprepared. Remaining aliquots were prepared by Percoll density centrifugation (95.0:47.5) or direct swim-up procedure and divided into aliquots to allow direct comparison of fresh and frozen semen and prepared sperm (frozen with or without the addition of seminal plasma) from the same ejaculate. Samples were frozen by static-phase vapor cooling and being plunged into liquid nitrogen. Thawing was carried out at room temperature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sperm DNA integrity was determined using a modified alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay, and motility was determined using computer-assisted semen analysis. RESULT(S): Sperm frozen unprepared in seminal fluid appeared more resistant to freezing damage than frozen prepared sperm. Further improvements can be achieved by selecting out the subpopulation of sperm with best motility and DNA integrity and freezing these sperm in seminal plasma, making this the optimal procedure. CONCLUSION(S): Freezing sperm in seminal plasma improves postthaw motility and DNA integrity.
Authors: Jeff G Wang; Nataki C Douglas; Robert Prosser; Daniel Kort; Janet M Choi; Mark V Sauer Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2009-01-28 Impact factor: 3.412