Literature DB >> 27210587

OCT-4 expression is essential for the segregation of trophectoderm lineages in porcine preimplantation embryos.

Natsuko Emura1, Nobuyuki Sakurai, Kazuki Takahashi, Tsutomu Hashizume, Ken Sawai.   

Abstract

Oct-4, a member of the POU family of transcription factors, is a key factor that regulates the segregation of the inner cell mass (ICM) and the trophectoderm (TE) during the transition from morula to blastocyst in mice. However, little is known about its role in porcine early embryogenesis. To determine the function of OCT-4 in the ICM and TE segregation of porcine embryos, we studied the developmental morphology of porcine embryos using RNA interference technology. Our experiments demonstrated that when 1-cell stage embryos were co-injected with the small interfering RNA (siRNA)for targeted knockdown of OCT-4 (OCT-4-siRNA) and tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-dextran conjugate (Dx), they failed to form blastocysts. Therefore, in this study, we constructed chimeric embryos comprising blastomeres that either expressed OCT-4 normally or showed downregulated OCT-4 expression by co-injection of OCT-4-siRNA and Dx into one blastomere in 2- to 4-cell stage embryos. In control embryos, which were co-injected with control siRNA and Dx, Dx-positive cells contributed to the TE lineage in almost all the blastocysts examined. In contrast, Dx-positive cells derived from a blastomere co-injected with OCT-4-siRNA and Dx were degenerated in almost half the blastocysts. This was probably due to the inability of these cells to differentiate into the TE lineage. Real-time RT-PCR analysis revealed no difference in the levels of SOX2, TEAD4, FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc, all of which are known to be regulated by OCT-4, between the OCT-4-siRNA-injected morulae and the control ones. However, the level of CDX2, a molecule specifically expressed in the TE lineage, was significantly higher in the former than in the latter. Our results indicate that continuous expression of OCT-4 in blastomeres is essential for TE formation of porcine embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27210587      PMCID: PMC5004796          DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2016-040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Dev        ISSN: 0916-8818            Impact factor:   2.214


The first visible cell lineage segregation in early mammalian development occurs during the transition from the morula to the blastocyst stage. The blastocyst consists of two types of cells: trophectoderm (TE), an epithelial sheet surrounding the fluid filled cavity known as blastocoel, and inner cell mass (ICM), a group of cells attached to the inside of TE. TE cells are involved in implantation and form extraembryonic tissues, including the placenta. In contrast, the cells of the ICM are pluripotent and eventually give rise to the fetus and additional extraembryonic tissues. The segregation of ICM and TE is regulated by various genes. Oct-4 (encoded by Pou5f1), a member of the POU family of transcription factors, is specifically expressed in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and germ cells [1, 2]. Furthermore, Oct-4 expression in mouse embryos is restricted to only the ICM [3]. Activation of Oct-4 expression is also used in the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) [4]. Mouse embryos lacking Oct-4 expression exhibited defective ICM formation, although they could differentiate into TE [2]. Therefore, Oct-4 is thought to be important for the formation and maintenance of ICM [2]. On the other hand, the downregulation of OCT-4 expression in 1-cell porcine embryos had no effect on development to the morula stage, but disrupted blastocyst formation, thus demonstrating the essential role of OCT-4 in the formation of ICM and TE in porcine embryos [5]. Since OCT-4 expression is detectable in both ICM and TE lineages of porcine embryos [3, 6, 7], it is likely that OCT-4 is expressed in TE precursors and directly regulates TE formation. In mouse embryos, fibroblast growth factor 4 (Fgf4), a target of Oct-4 [8, 9], is required for TE cell proliferation [10,11,12,13]. Fgf4 is highly expressed in ICM and activates the Fgf receptor expressed in the TE lineage [14, 15]. Thus, Fgf4Fgf receptor signaling plays an important role in the proliferation and differentiation of TE cells [10, 16]. If there is a similar signaling pathway in porcine embryos, it is possible that OCT-4 is expressed in ICM precursors and plays a role in the segregation of ICM and TE, probably through downstream factors. Recently, RNA interference (RNAi) has been shown to be functional in porcine preimplantation embryos [5]. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) silence specific genes via a targeted mRNA degradation and are widely used in molecular and cellular research [17]. Our previous study demonstrated that cytoplasmic injection of siRNA targeting OCT-4 (hereafter referred to as OCT-4-siRNA) disrupted blastocyst formation [5], probably due to decreased OCT-4 expression in all cells of the blastocyst. However, with this approach, it is impossible to trace the fate of blastomeres that exhibit downregulated OCT-4 expression. Therefore, in the present study, we co-injected OCT-4-siRNA and tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-dextran conjugate (hereafter referred to as Dx; used as a marker) into one blastomere of a 2- to 4-cell stage porcine embryo. Using this method, we generated embryos which have both OCT-4-downregulated and OCT-4-expressed cells, and observed whether the OCT-4-downregulated cells contribute to the TE lineage. We hypothesized that if the OCT-4-downregulated cells do not contribute to the TE lineage, then direct OCT-4 expression is essential for TE formation. In contrast, if the OCT-4-downregulated cells contribute to the TE lineage, it would show that some signaling from the cells normally expressing OCT-4 likely drives TE formation, namely OCT-4 is essential for TE formation indirectly. In this study, to generate embryos that have both OCT-4-downregulated and OCT-4-expressed blastomeres, we injected the siRNA and Dx in one blastomere of the 2- to 4-cell stage embryos and traced that cell and its daughter cells. However, when using in vitro fertilization (IVF), we had several embryos at different developmental time points, including 1- to 8-cell stage embryos. To synchronize the number of 2- to 4-cell stage embryos at the time of injection, we opted to produce embryos by parthenogenesis. In this study, we examined the mRNA expression patterns of SRY-related HMG-box gene 2 (SOX2), Caudal-related homeobox 2 (CDX2) and TEA domain family transcription factor 4 (TEAD4) in porcine embryos. SOX2 expresses in the ICM of porcine blastocysts [18], and Fgf4 is activated by the Oct-4Sox2 complex [8, 9]. On the other hand, in mouse embryos, mutual antagonism between Oct-4 and Cdx2 contributes to the segregation of ICM and TE, with Cdx2 restricted to the outer cells and Oct-4 restricted to the inner cells of the morula [19]. In addition, Tead4 is an important factor for TE development by acting upstream of Cdx2 [20, 21]. As described above, we examined the role of OCT-4 in the segregation of TE lineage in porcine embryos using embryos constructed with OCT-4-downregulated and OCT-4-expressed cells.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise stated.

Oocyte collection and in vitro maturation

Ovaries were collected from prepubertal gilts at a local slaughterhouse and were maintained at 37ºC during transport to the laboratory. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were obtained from follicles 2–6 mm in diameter in TCM-199 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 20 mM Hepes, 0.68 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/ml penicillin G potassium (Meiji Seika, Tokyo, Japan), and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate (Meiji Seika). Approximately 50 COCs with uniform ooplasm and a cumulus cell mass were separately cultured in four-well dishes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kanagawa, Japan) for 20 h in 500 μl of maturation medium, which was composed of a modified North Carolina State University (NCSU)-37 (mNCSU-37) [22] solution containing 10% porcine follicular fluid, 0.6 mM cysteine, 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), 10 IU/ml pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMS 1000, ZENOAQ, Koriyama, Japan), and 10 IU/ml human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; Puberogen 1500, Novartis, Tokyo, Japan). The developing COCs were subsequently cultured in maturation medium without dbcAMP and hormones for 27 h. The maturation culture was performed at 39°C in a humidified atmosphere comprising 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2.

Parthenogenetic activation and in vitro culture

After in vitro maturation, the COCs were transferred to 0.1% hyaluronidase medium and freed from cumulus cells by pipetting. Denuded oocytes were washed with PZM-5 [23], and the oocytes were pulsed with single direct current electric pulse of 150 V/1 mm for 100 µsec. Electro-stimulated oocytes were washed and cultured for 5 h at 39ºC under a 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 atmosphere in modified PZM-5 (mPZM-5) containing 5 µg/ml cytochalasin B and 10 µg/ml cycloheximide. Following microinjection of siRNA, the embryos were washed and cultured in PZM-5 at 39ºC under a 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 atmosphere until day 6 (PA = day 0). Rates of embryo development were assessed on day 2 (2-cell ≤), day 3 (8-cell ≤), day 4 (16-cell and morula), day 5 and day 6 (blastocyst).

siRNA microinjection into embryos

We used the same siRNA used for OCT-4 knockdown, as described previously [5]. The target sites of the OCT-4 transcript were selected from porcine sequences (GenBank accession number: NM_001113060). OCT-4-siRNA was synthesized by the outside company based on the sequences shown in Table 1. After parthenogenetic activation, embryos were subsequently transferred to a 20 μl drop of modified TALP (mTALP) medium [24], containing 1 mg/ml BSA (fraction V) for microinjection. Approximately 10 pl of 50 μΜ specific siRNA duplexes with 4 mg/ml Dx (MW 70,000; Invitrogen) or specific siRNA without Dx was injected into the cytoplasm of each 1-cell stage embryo using a Transjector 5246 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Approximately 10 pl of 20 μΜ nonsilencing siRNA (AllStars Negative Control siRNA, Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan) with Dx or nonsilencing siRNA without Dx was injected as control siRNA using the same method. To inject one blastomere of a 2- to 4-cell stage embryo, the embryos were cultured in PZM-5 for 20 h at 39ºC under a 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 atmosphere after parthenogenetic activation. Either specific siRNA with Dx or nonsilencing siRNA with Dx was injected into the blastomere. The embryos were washed seven times immediately after microinjection, and cultured as described above.
Table 1.

Primers and siRNA sequences

NameNucleotide sequences (5’–3’)Annealing temperature (C)Fragment size (bp)GenBank accession no.
OCT-4F- GTTCTCTTTGGGAAGGTGTT56313NM_001113060
R- ACACGCGGACCACATCCTTC
SOX2F- GCCCTGCAGTACAACTCCAT60216EU503117.1
R- GCTGATCATGTCCCGTAGGT
CDX2F- CAGGCCCTCTGAGAAGTGTC60212XM_003130908
R- GGGGTCTTTCCTGAGGATTC
TEAD4F- TGGTGGAGAAAGTGGAGACC60157XM_605145
R- AAGTTCTCCAGCACGCTGTT
FGF4F- GCGATGAGTGCAAGTTCAAA60155XM_003122418
R- GAGGAAGTGGGTGACCTTCA
FGFR1-IIIcF- ACTGCTGGAGTTAATACCACCG60125AJ577088
R- GCAGAGTGATGGGAGAGTCC
GAPDHF- TCGGAGTGAACGGATTTG52219AF017079
R- CCTGGAAGATGGTGATGG
OCT-4-siRNAS- GGGAAGGUGUUCAGCCAAATTN/AN/AN/A
AS- UUUGGCUGAACACCUUCCCTTN/AN/AN/A

F, forward; R, reverse; S, sense strand; AS, antisense strand.

F, forward; R, reverse; S, sense strand; AS, antisense strand.

Confocal microscopy and image analysis

On day 6, blastocysts that contained Dx-positive cells were incubated with 1 mg/ml calcein-AM (Invitrogen) in dimethyl sulfoxide at a concentration of 1:1000 at 39ºC in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in air for 30 min in 0.5% BSA-PBS. Live cells were detected by calcein-AM staining. These embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, and then washed in 0.5% BSA-PBS. Embryos were placed in PBS on a glass-bottom dish (Iwaki, Osaka, Japan) coated with Cell-Tak (Corning, Discovery Labware, Bedlford, MA, USA). Fluorescent images were obtained using confocal laser scanning microscope systems (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti-E, C2si; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and were analyzed using the Nikon NIS Element AR 40006 64 bit software (Nikon).

Determination of the relative abundance of gene transcripts in porcine embryos

On day 4, the morulae, which were injected with or without siRNA or siRNA and Dx conjugate at the 1-cell stage, were treated with 0.1% protease in 1% PVP-PBS for 5 min and washed seven times in 1% PVP-PBS. Pools of five embryos were added to 5 μl of lysis buffer [0.8% Igepal (ICN Biomedicals, Aurora, OH, USA), 5 mM DTT (Invitrogen) and 1 U/μl of RNasin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA)], snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80ºC. RNA samples were heated to 80ºC for 5 min and treated for reverse transcription (RT) using a QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCRs were performed using a StepOneTM system (Applied Biosystems, Tokyo, Japan), and the products were detected with SYBR Green included in the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen). A 2 μl aliquot of the RT product was used for each quantification. The amplification program was as follows: preincubation at 95ºC for 15 min to activate HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase (Qiagen), followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 94ºC for 15 sec, annealing of primers at different temperatures (Table 1) for 30 sec, and elongation at 72ºC for 30 sec. After the end of the last cycle, a melting curve was generated by starting fluorescence acquisition at 60ºC and recording measurements at 0.3ºC increments up to 95ºC. A standard curve was generated for each amplicon by amplifying serial dilutions of a known quantity. PCR products for each gene were purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen), quantified by measuring absorbance at 260 nm using NanoDrop (ND-1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kanagawa, Japan), and diluted as described. Serial 10-fold dilutions for creating the standard curve were amplified in every real-time PCR run. The standards and cDNA samples were then co-amplified in the same reaction prepared from a master mix. Fluorescence was acquired at each cycle to determine the threshold cycle or the cycle during the log-linear phase of the reaction at which fluorescence increased above the background for each sample. Final quantification was performed using a StepOneTM quantification software. Expression of the target gene in each run was normalized to that of the internal standard glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Five samples were used for quantitative analysis, and each sample was run in duplicate for real-time PCR.

Immunofluorescence staining

On day 4, morulae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, and then washed twice in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (TXPBS) for 10 min each time. Samples were subsequently permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min and then incubated in Image-iT FX Signal Enhancer (Invitrogen) for 30 min, followed by washing twice for 10 min in TXPBS. Blocking was performed by incubation in 7% normal goat serum (Invitrogen) in TXPBS for 1.5 h, followed by washing in TXPBS for 5 min. Rabbit polyclonal anti-OCT-4 primary antibody (SC-9081, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) was used at a concentration of 1:50 at 4ºC overnight in PBS containing 0.5% BSA and 0.05% Triton X-100. Embryos were washed four times in TXPBS for 15 min each time. The embryos were then incubated with Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (A11034, Invitrogen) at a concentration of 1:400 at room temperature for 1 h in PBS containing 0.5% BSA and 0.05% Triton X-100. The embryos were then washed in TXPBS four times for 20 min each time. Samples were then mounted on slides in a drop of VECTASHIELD mounting medium with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Fluorescent images were obtained using inverted microscope systems (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti-U, Nikon DIGITAL SIGHT DS-L3, DS-Fi2; Nikon).

Statistical analysis

The percentage data for embryo development and contribution to TE were subjected to arcsine transformation. The transformed developmental values for embryos that were injected with siRNA at the 1-cell stage and the transcript levels of SOX2, CDX2, and TEAD4 were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by multiple pairwise comparisons using the Tukey–Kramer method or the Fisher method. The transformed developmental values for embryos that were injected with siRNA at the 2- to 4-cell stage and values of contribution to TE were analyzed by the F-test, followed by the Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney’s U test. The transcript levels of OCT-4, FGF4, and FGFR1-IIIc were analyzed by the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by multiple pairwise comparisons using the Scheffé method. A P value less than 0.05 denoted a statistically significant difference.

Results

Effect of siRNA injection on OCT-4 expression in porcine embryos

The expression levels of OCT-4 mRNA in morula stage embryos that were uninjected, injected with control siRNA, or injected with OCT-4-siRNA at the 1-cell stage were evaluated (Fig. 1A). The relative abundance of OCT-4 in OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos was significantly (P < 0.001) lower than that in uninjected and control siRNA-injected embryos.
Fig. 1.

OCT-4 mRNA and protein expression in porcine embryos. (A) Relative abundance (mean ± SEM) of OCT-4 transcripts in uninjected porcine morula stage embryos (n = 5) or porcine morula stage embryos treated with control siRNA + Dx (n = 5), or with OCT-4-siRNA + Dx (n = 5). a, b Different superscripts indicate a significant difference (P < 0.001). (B) OCT-4 signals (indicated by arrows) were visible in the uninjected morula as well as the morula derived from the control siRNA-injected 1-cell stage embryo. However, such signals were absent in the morula derived from the OCT-4-siRNA-injected 1-cell stage embryo (shown by arrowheads).

OCT-4 mRNA and protein expression in porcine embryos. (A) Relative abundance (mean ± SEM) of OCT-4 transcripts in uninjected porcine morula stage embryos (n = 5) or porcine morula stage embryos treated with control siRNA + Dx (n = 5), or with OCT-4-siRNA + Dx (n = 5). a, b Different superscripts indicate a significant difference (P < 0.001). (B) OCT-4 signals (indicated by arrows) were visible in the uninjected morula as well as the morula derived from the control siRNA-injected 1-cell stage embryo. However, such signals were absent in the morula derived from the OCT-4-siRNA-injected 1-cell stage embryo (shown by arrowheads). Expression of the OCT-4 protein was evaluated in the morula stage embryos (Fig. 1B). OCT-4 signals were detected in cell nuclei in the uninjected and control siRNA-injected embryos, but were difficult to detect in the nuclei of OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos.

Effect of OCT-4 downregulation on the development of porcine embryos

In vitro developmental competence of embryos injected with OCT-4-siRNA at the 1-cell stage was evaluated (Table 2). On day 2, the rate of 2-cell ≤ was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in uninjected embryos than in control siRNA-injected or OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos. On day 3, the 8-cell ≤ rate of OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of the uninjected embryos. On days 5 and 6, the blastocyst developmental rate of the OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of the uninjected and control siRNA-injected embryos.
Table 2.

Effect of OCT-4-siRNA injection at the 1-cell stage on in vitro development of porcine embryos*

TreatmentNumber of embryos culturedNo. (%) of embryos developed to

Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6





2-cell ≤8-cell ≤16-cellMorulaBlastocystBlastocyst
Uninjected201160 (79.6)a123 (61.2)a47 (23.4)49 (24.4)91 (45.3)a81 (40.3)a
Control siRNA197135 (68.5)b99 (50.3)ab47 (23.9)32 (16.2)56 (28.4)b50 (25.4)b
OCT-4-siRNA191125 (65.4)b80 (41.9)b36 (18.8)32 (16.8)11 (5.8)c9 (4.7)c

* Experiments were replicated four times. † Percentages of the number of embryos cultured. a, b, c Values with different superscripts within each column differ significantly (P < 0.05).

* Experiments were replicated four times. † Percentages of the number of embryos cultured. a, b, c Values with different superscripts within each column differ significantly (P < 0.05). On the other hand, no differences were observed in developmental rates between OCT-4-siRNA-injected and control siRNA-injected into one blastomere of 2- to 4-cell stage embryos (Table 3). On days 5 and 6, OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos could develop to the blastocyst stage (22.4% and 24.4%, respectively).
Table 3.

Effect of OCT-4-siRNA injection at the 2- to 4-cell stage on in vitro development of porcine embryos*

TreatmentNumber of embryos culturedNo. (%) of embryos developed to

Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6





2-cell ≤8-cell ≤16-cellMorulaBlastocystBlastocyst
Control siRNA247209 (84.6)101 (40.9)53 (21.5)53 (21.5)91 (36.8)91 (36.8)
OCT-4-siRNA250207 (82.8)77 (30.8)49 (19.6)49 (19.6)56 (22.4)61 (24.4)

* Experiments were replicated six times. † Percentages of the number of embryos cultured.

* Experiments were replicated six times. † Percentages of the number of embryos cultured. Dx-positive blastomeres were detected in all developmental stages of embryos obtained from either OCT-4-siRNA or control siRNA injection at the 2- to 4-cell stage (Table 4). Detection rates of Dx-positive cells at the blastocyst stage (days 5 and 6) were 73.8% to 83.5%.
Table 4.

Developmental competence of porcine embryos, which is constructed from Dx-positive and Dx-negative cells

TreatmentNo. (%) of embryos developed to

Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6





4-cell8-cell8-cell16-cell16-cellMorulaBlastocystBlastocyst
Control siRNA72/132 (54.5)36/51 (70.6)58/83 (69.9)11/17 (64.7)40/53 (75.5)35/53 (66.0)76/91 (83.5) 75/91 (82.4)
OCT-4-siRNA89/147 (60.5)36/41 (87.8)52/62 (83.9)11/15 (73.3)38/49 (77.6)38/49 (77.6)42/56 (75.0) 45/61 (73.8)

† Percentage of the number of embryos cultured.

† Percentage of the number of embryos cultured.

Fate of OCT-4-downregulated blastomeres after siRNA injection at the 2- to 4-cell stage

To investigate whether Dx-positive cells contribute to the TE lineage, blastocysts developing from 2- to 4-cell stage embryos that had received blastomere injection were inspected for fluorescence using confocal microscopy on day 6. Dx-positive cells were judged as live or dead cells based on calcein-AM staining: live cells show green fluorescence, as shown in Fig. 2B. According to the results of fluorescence imaging, we classified the stained blastocysts into three groups, namely TE, TE + Deg., and Deg. In the TE group, the number of blastocysts having all Dx-positive and calcein-AM-stained cells that are supposed to contribute to the TE lineage was significantly (P < 0.05; 57.9% vs. 20.0%) higher in blastocysts that received blastomere injection with the control siRNA than in those that received blastomere injection with the OCT-4-siRNA (Fig. 2A). In the Deg. group, the number of blastocysts having degenerated (as shown by the presence of non-calcein-AM-stained cells), but Dx-positive cells in almost a half of the embryos was significantly (P < 0.01; 46.7% vs. 5.3%) higher in the blastocysts that received blastomere injection with the OCT-4-siRNA than in those that received blastomere injection with the control siRNA (Fig. 2A). In the TE + Deg. group, there was no difference in the number of blastocysts having Dx-positive and calcein-AM-stained cells and Dx-positive but non-calcein-AM-stained cells between the OCT-4-siRNA- and the control siRNA-injected embryos (33.3% vs. 36.8%; Fig. 2A).
Fig. 2.

Fate of OCT-4-downregulated blastomeres from embryos injected with siRNA and Dx at the 2- to 4-cell stage. (A) The percentage of TE formation in porcine blastocyst stage embryos following injection of one blastomere with control siRNA + Dx (n = 38) or with OCT-4-siRNA + Dx (n = 30) at the 2- to 4-cell stage. a, b Different superscripts indicate a significant difference. (B) Representative photographs of calcein-AM and Dx signals in porcine embryos. siRNA-injected blastomeres fluoresced red and live cells fluoresced green. All Dx-positive cells were stained by calcein-AM (TE), some Dx-positive cells were not stained by calcein-AM (TE+Deg.), and all Dx-positive cells were not stained by calcein-AM (Deg.).

Fate of OCT-4-downregulated blastomeres from embryos injected with siRNA and Dx at the 2- to 4-cell stage. (A) The percentage of TE formation in porcine blastocyst stage embryos following injection of one blastomere with control siRNA + Dx (n = 38) or with OCT-4-siRNA + Dx (n = 30) at the 2- to 4-cell stage. a, b Different superscripts indicate a significant difference. (B) Representative photographs of calcein-AM and Dx signals in porcine embryos. siRNA-injected blastomeres fluoresced red and live cells fluoresced green. All Dx-positive cells were stained by calcein-AM (TE), some Dx-positive cells were not stained by calcein-AM (TE+Deg.), and all Dx-positive cells were not stained by calcein-AM (Deg.).

Relative expression levels of mRNA in porcine embryos derived from OCT-4-siRNA injection

To clarify the effects of OCT-4 downregulation on the expression patterns of SOX2, CDX2, and TEAD4, all of which are regulated by OCT-4, real-time RT-PCR was performed using morulae that are derived from 1-cell stage embryos injected with the control siRNA or OCT-4-siRNA as well as using uninjected morulae. As shown in Fig. 3A and 3C, the relative abundances of SOX2 and TEAD4 mRNAs did not differ between the treatment groups. However, CDX2 expression was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos than in control siRNA-injected embryos (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, we examined the mRNA level of FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc to investigate the effects of OCT-4 downregulation on the FGF4 and FGF receptor. As shown in Fig. 4, the relative abundance of FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc transcripts did not differ between the treatment groups.
Fig. 3.

Relative abundance (mean ± SEM) of (A) SOX2, (B) CDX2 and (C) TEAD4 transcripts in uninjected porcine morula (n = 5) or porcine morula treated with control siRNA (n = 5) or with OCT-4-siRNA (n = 5). a, b Different superscripts indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05).

Fig. 4.

Relative abundance (mean ± SEM) of (A) FGF4 and (B) FGFR1-IIIc transcripts in uninjected porcine morula (n = 5) or porcine morula treated with control siRNA + Dx (n = 5) or with OCT-4-siRNA + Dx (n = 5).

Relative abundance (mean ± SEM) of (A) SOX2, (B) CDX2 and (C) TEAD4 transcripts in uninjected porcine morula (n = 5) or porcine morula treated with control siRNA (n = 5) or with OCT-4-siRNA (n = 5). a, b Different superscripts indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05). Relative abundance (mean ± SEM) of (A) FGF4 and (B) FGFR1-IIIc transcripts in uninjected porcine morula (n = 5) or porcine morula treated with control siRNA + Dx (n = 5) or with OCT-4-siRNA + Dx (n = 5).

Discussion

Oct-4, the marker of pluripotent cells, is required in vitro for establishment and maintenance of ESCs and for reprogramming somatic cells to pluripotency [2, 4, 25]. In mouse embryos, Oct-4 is essential for the formation and maintenance of ICM [2]. In the present study, to clarify the necessity of OCT-4 for segregation of TE lineage in porcine embryos, we generated porcine embryos with blastomeres expressing OCT-4 at reduced and normal levels and investigated the developmental morphology. In murine embryos, although blastocyst formation was slightly reduced by Oct-4-siRNA injection [26], Oct-4-morpholino oligonucleotide-injected embryos failed to form blastocyst [27]. In porcine embryos derived from IVF, OCT-4 is required for embryonic development from the morula to the blastocyst stage [5]. In this study, OCT-4 downregulation inhibited the transformation of morula to blastocyst in porcine embryos derived by parthenogenetic treatment. This result is similar to that of IVF embryos [5]. Thus, in porcine parthenogenetic embryos, OCT-4 is essential for development from the morula to the blastocyst stage. On the other hand, in porcine embryos, OCT-4-downregurated embryos obtained using the CRISPR/CAS9 system developed to the blastocyst stage [28]. OCT-4 downregulation by siRNA, both maternal and embryonic transcript of OCT-4 may be downregulate. However, maternal OCT-4 expression may remain using the CRISPR/CAS9 system. It is possible that maternal OCT-4 expression is important for blastocyst formation of porcine embryos. To clarify the role of maternal and embryonic OCT-4 expression, combined RNA interference and CRISPR/CAS9 system should be necessary in future experiments. At the 2-cell and blastocyst stage, the developmental rates of OCT-4-siRNA-injected and control siRNA-injected embryos were significantly lower than those of uninjected embryos. The siRNAs were conjugated with Dx. Dextran-induced anaphylactic reactions have been observed in humans, although there are few reports of problems with experimental animals have appeared [29, 30]. Therefore, it is possible that Dx exerted some toxicity in the embryos. However, the blastocyst formation rate of embryos injected with OCT-4-siRNA and Dx was significantly lower than that in the embryos injected with control siRNA and Dx, thus developmental arrest was attributed to OCT-4-siRNA injection. In the present study, although embryos injected with OCT-4-siRNA at the 1-cell stage failed to form blastocysts, embryos injected with OCT-4-siRNA into only one blastomere at the 2- to 4-cell stage developed into blastocysts. Furthermore, Dx-positive blastomeres were detected in embryos at all developmental stages. However, Dx-positive cells in almost all OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos were degenerated. In most OCT-4-downregulated cells were difficult to contributing to the TE lineage and the blastocysts constructed from only OCT-4-expressed cells. Therefore, in porcine embryos, segregation of the TE lineage needs direct OCT-4 expression in the blastomeres. OCT-4 transcripts were detected at high levels in porcine oocytes, followed by consistent degradation to the 8-cell stage and increased at the morula stage [31]. In porcine morulae, OCT-4 protein signal was observed in blastomeres derived from parthenogenetic treatment. In addition, almost all cells expressed OCT-4 at the blastocyst stage (data not shown). Thus, in porcine embryos, it is possible that OCT-4 expression in blastomeres at the morula stage is important for segregation of TE lineages. However, a few OCT-4-downregulated cells contributed to the TE lineage. These results indicate the possibility that OCT-4 downstream factors from the OCT-4-expressed cells exerted some effects on the OCT-4-downregulated cells, and this signaling pathway was involved in the differentiation of TE. In this study, direct OCT-4 expression in the blastomere was essential for segregation of the TE lineages. To identify the OCT-4 downstream factors, we examined the mRNA expression of candidate genes SOX2, CDX2, and TEAD4. Sox2 is required for the expression of pluripotency genes and for the repression of TE related genes in ESCs [32,33,34,35]. Sox2 acts cooperatively with Oct-4 and activates pluripotency factors such as Oct-4, Sox2, and Nanog [32, 35,36,37,38,39]. In porcine embryos, SOX2 specifically express in the ICM and epiblast [7, 18]. In mouse embryos, Sox2 is essential for the formation of both ICM and TE [40, 41]. In this study, the SOX2 expression level in OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos did not differ from that in control embryos. This result suggests that in porcine embryos, SOX2 expression is not under the influence of OCT-4. In mouse embryos, Cdx2 is expressed by Tead4 and regulates TE segregation [20, 21, 42, 43]. In this study, the CDX2 expression level in OCT-4-siRNA-injected embryos was higher than that in control siRNA-injected embryos. It is well known that Oct-4 and Cdx2 enhance their own expression, while mutually suppressing the expression of one another in ESCs [19]. Our result corresponded to the reported mutual antagonism between these two factors. Therefore, it is possible that OCT-4 regulates ICM/TE segregation through inhibition of CDX2 expression in porcine embryos. In contrast, TEAD4 expression was unchanged in porcine morulae. In a previous study, TEAD4 expression was observed in the 4-cell to blastocyst stages of porcine embryos, and differences in TEAD4 expression levels between ICM and TE lineages became appreciable in the elongation stages, such as the filamentous stage [6, 44]. These results suggested that TEAD4 expression is not under the influence of OCT-4, but it is possible that TEAD4 is a regulatory factor for the expression of TE related genes in porcine embryos. Our findings are indicative of a signaling pathway involved in OCT-4 expression for TE formation. In mouse embryos, the Fgf4 expressed in the ICM acts on TE cells through the Fgf receptor to maintain a proliferating population of TE cells [10, 13]. In addition, in Oct-4 deficient mouse embryos, the Fgf4 transcription level was greatly reduced at the blastocyst stage [2]. Fgf4 is activated by the Oct-4Sox2 complex [8, 9]. These results suggest that FGF4 expression is regulated by OCT-4 in ICM precursors and that FGF4 is involved in the differentiation of the TE lineage in porcine embryos. Therefore, we examined the expression of FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc in porcine embryos injected with OCT-4-siRNA. However, the expression of both genes was unchanged in porcine embryos at the morula stage. In a previous study, FGF4 expression was high in porcine ICM lineage in the blastocysts and the elongation stages [6]. Moreover, FGF4 influenced the growth TE cells during the elongation of porcine embryos [45]. It is possible that FGF4 expression is not under the influence of OCT-4 until completion of the ICM/TE segregation. In conclusion, we showed that direct OCT-4 expression in the blastomere is essential for TE segregation in porcine embryos. This is the first study to demonstrate the critical importance of OCT-4 for TE formation by porcine embryos and these findings provide the basis for understanding the mechanism of early lineage segregation in porcine embryos. Further studies, such as ChIP analysis and knockdown of other target genes by siRNA, are needed to fully understand the molecular mechanism underlying TE lineage segregation in porcine embryos.
  45 in total

Review 1.  RNA interference.

Authors:  Gregory J Hannon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Analysis of co-expression of OCT4, NANOG and SOX2 in pluripotent cells of the porcine embryo, in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Leonie du Puy; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Henk P Haagsman; Bernard A J Roelen
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Paracrine effects of embryo-derived FGF4 and BMP4 during pig trophoblast elongation.

Authors:  Griselda Valdez Magaña; Aida Rodríguez; Haixin Zhang; Robert Webb; Ramiro Alberio
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Effects of amino acid supplements and replacement of polyvinyl alcohol with bovine serum albumin in porcine zygote medium.

Authors:  Chie Suzuki; Koji Yoshioka
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Octamer and Sox elements are required for transcriptional cis regulation of Nanog gene expression.

Authors:  Takao Kuroda; Masako Tada; Hiroshi Kubota; Hironobu Kimura; Shin-ya Hatano; Hirofumi Suemori; Norio Nakatsuji; Takashi Tada
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Pluripotent lineage definition in bovine embryos by Oct4 transcript localization.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurosaka; Sigrid Eckardt; K John McLaughlin
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Specific gene-regulation networks during the pre-implantation development of the pig embryo as revealed by deep sequencing.

Authors:  Suying Cao; Jianyong Han; Jun Wu; Qiuyan Li; Shichao Liu; Wei Zhang; Yangli Pei; Xiaoan Ruan; Zhonghua Liu; Xumin Wang; Bing Lim; Ning Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  CRISPR/Cas9 as tool for functional study of genes involved in preimplantation embryo development.

Authors:  Jeongwoo Kwon; Suk Namgoong; Nam-Hyung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  HIPPO pathway members restrict SOX2 to the inner cell mass where it promotes ICM fates in the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Eryn Wicklow; Stephanie Blij; Tristan Frum; Yoshikazu Hirate; Richard A Lang; Hiroshi Sasaki; Amy Ralston
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function.

Authors:  Ariel A Avilion; Silvia K Nicolis; Larysa H Pevny; Lidia Perez; Nigel Vivian; Robin Lovell-Badge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  3 in total

1.  Species-Specific Enhancer Activity of OCT4 in Porcine Pluripotency: The Porcine OCT4 Reporter System Could Monitor Pluripotency in Porcine Embryo Development and Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Seung-Hun Kim; Mingyun Lee; Kwang-Hwan Choi; Jinsol Jeong; Dong-Kyung Lee; Jong-Nam Oh; Gyung Cheol Choe; Chang-Kyu Lee
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 5.131

Review 2.  Roles of cell differentiation factors in preimplantation development of domestic animals.

Authors:  Ken Sawai
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 3.  Cell fate determination and Hippo signaling pathway in preimplantation mouse embryo.

Authors:  Ecem Yildirim; Gizem Bora; Tugce Onel; Nilsu Talas; Aylin Yaba
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.249

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.