In mouse embryos, segregation of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) lineages is regulated by genes, such as OCT-4, CDX2 and TEAD4. However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the segregation of the ICM and TE lineages in porcine embryos remain unknown. To obtain insights regarding the segregation of the ICM and TE lineages in porcine embryos, we examined the mRNA expression patterns of candidate genes, OCT-4, CDX2, TEAD4, GATA3, NANOG, FGF4, FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc, in blastocyst and elongated stage embryos. In blastocyst embryos, the expression levels of OCT-4, FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc were significantly higher in the ICM than in the TE, while the CDX2, TEAD4 and GATA3 levels did not differ between the ICM and TE. The expression ratio of CDX2 to OCT-4 (CDX2/OCT-4) also did not differ between the ICM and TE at the blastocyst stage. In elongated embryos, OCT-4, NANOG, FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc were abundantly expressed in the embryo disc (ED; ICM lineage), but their expression levels were very low in the TE. In contrast, the CDX2, TEAD4 and GATA3 levels were significantly higher in the TE than in the ED. In addition, the CDX2/OCT-4 ratio was markedly higher in the TE than in the ED. We demonstrated that differences in the expression levels of OCT-4, CDX2, TEAD4, GATA3, NANOG, FGF4, FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc genes between ICM and TE lineages cells become more clear during development from porcine blastocyst to elongated embryos, which indicates the possibility that in porcine embryos, functions of ICM and TE lineage cells depend on these gene expressions proceed as transition from blastocyst to elongated stage.
In mouse embryos, segregation of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) lineages is regulated by genes, such as OCT-4, CDX2 and TEAD4. However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the segregation of the ICM and TE lineages in porcine embryos remain unknown. To obtain insights regarding the segregation of the ICM and TE lineages in porcine embryos, we examined the mRNA expression patterns of candidate genes, OCT-4, CDX2, TEAD4, GATA3, NANOG, FGF4, FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc, in blastocyst and elongated stage embryos. In blastocyst embryos, the expression levels of OCT-4, FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc were significantly higher in the ICM than in the TE, while the CDX2, TEAD4 and GATA3 levels did not differ between the ICM and TE. The expression ratio of CDX2 to OCT-4 (CDX2/OCT-4) also did not differ between the ICM and TE at the blastocyst stage. In elongated embryos, OCT-4, NANOG, FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc were abundantly expressed in the embryo disc (ED; ICM lineage), but their expression levels were very low in the TE. In contrast, the CDX2, TEAD4 and GATA3 levels were significantly higher in the TE than in the ED. In addition, the CDX2/OCT-4 ratio was markedly higher in the TE than in the ED. We demonstrated that differences in the expression levels of OCT-4, CDX2, TEAD4, GATA3, NANOG, FGF4, FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc genes between ICM and TE lineages cells become more clear during development from porcine blastocyst to elongated embryos, which indicates the possibility that in porcine embryos, functions of ICM and TE lineage cells depend on these gene expressions proceed as transition from blastocyst to elongated stage.
The pig has attracted increasing attention as a suitable source for xenotransplantation, as a
transgenic animal to produce specific proteins and as a biomedical model for the study of
human physiology and pathology. Successful piglet production from in vitro
produced embryos, such as those produced by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or
somatic cell nuclear transfer [1, 2], has accelerated these processes. However, in vitro
production (IVP) of porcine embryos is still inefficient compared with in other mammals, such
as mice and cattle, because of the low rate of development to the blastocyst stage and the
poor blastocyst quality [3]. One of the reasons for the
developmental retardation of the porcine IVP system is limited knowledge of the molecular
mechanisms for early embryonic development. Therefore, in order to improve the IVP system for
porcine embryos, it is important to perform a further basic research on molecular mechanisms
that regulate the early embryonic development.Differentiation of unspecialized cells into other cell types is a crucial process of
development. Thus, understanding the molecular mechanisms governing lineage segregation during
early embryonic development is critical to dissect fundamental developmental pathways. In
early mammalian development, the first lineage segregation occurs during the transition from
the morula to blastocyst stage when blastomeres differentiate into the inner cell mass (ICM)
and the trophectoderm (TE). The ICM is a group of pluripotent cells attached to the inside of
the TE that gives rise to the embryonic tissue comprising the ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm
[4]. On the other hand, the TE is a single layer of
polarized cells surrounding the blastocoel, which gives rise to the embryonic portion of the
placenta [5, 6].
The segregation of the ICM and TE lineages is regulated by the interaction of various genes.
In mouse embryos, the transcription factors, POU domain class 5 transcription factor 1 (OCT-4)
and Caudal-related homeobox 2 (CDX2) play pivotal roles in the segregation of the ICM and TE
[7,8,9]. Recently, interaction between NANOG and CDX2 was
observed [10], indicating that NANOG is also involved
in regulating the segregation of the ICM and TE. In addition, TEA domain family transcription
factor 4 (TEAD4) and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) have been identified as important factors
for TE development that act upstream of CDX2 [11,12,13]. Furthermore, fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF4) is required for functional ICM
formation [14], and FGF4-FGF receptor (FGFR)-2
signaling plays an important role in proliferation and differentiation of TE cells [15, 16].As just described, molecular mechanisms that regulate the segregation of the ICM and TE
lineages have been well characterized in mouse embryos. However, little information is
available for the segregation of the ICM and TE lineages in porcine embryos. Recently, some
researchers reported that in contrast to the mouse, OCT-4 expression does not
appear to be restricted to the ICM, even in expanded blastocysts in pigs and cattle [17,18,19,20]. These
findings led us to expect a difference in the molecular mechanisms that regulate the
segregation of the ICM and TE lineages between species.Patterns of preimplantation development and implantation differ remarkably between mammalian
species. For instance, mouse embryos invasively implant at the blastocyst stage, and then form
an egg cylinder. On the other hand, porcine blastocysts elongate before implantation,
transforming from a spherical to ovoid shape and then subsequently into a long thin filament
[21]. These developmental differences may influence
the mechanisms that regulate the segregation of the ICM and TE lineages. Therefore, in order
to obtain better understanding of the molecular mechanism responsible for the segregation of
the ICM and TE lineages in porcine embryos, it is necessary to study changes in the expression
of genes during preimplantation development including the elongated stage. In the present
study, we comprehensively examined the mRNA expression patterns of OCT-4,
CDX2, TEAD4, GATA3,
NANOG, FGF4, FGFR1-IIIc and
FGFR2-IIIc, which are well known as principal factors responsible for
segregation of the ICM and TE lineages of mouse embryos in porcine blastocyst and elongated
stage embryos.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise
stated.
Oocyte collection and in vitro maturation
Ovaries from prepubertal gilts were obtained at a local slaughterhouse and transported to
the laboratory at 37 C. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were collected from follicles 2–6
mm in diameter in TCM 199 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS;
Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 20 mM Hepes, 0.68 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin Gpotassium (Meiji Seika, Tokyo, Japan) and 100 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate (Meiji Seika).
In vitro maturation of oocytes was essentially performed according to a
previous study [2]. In brief, approximately 50 COCs
with uniform ooplasm and a compact cumulus cell mass were cultured separately in 500 μl of
maturation medium, a modified North Carolina State University (NCSU)-37 (mNCSU-37 [22]) solution containing 10% porcine follicular fluid,
0.6 mM cysteine, 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), 10 IU/ml
pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMS 1000, ZENOAQ, Nippon Zenyaku Kogyo, Koriyama,
Japan), and 10 IU/ml human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; Puberogen 1500, Novartis, Tokyo,
Japan), in four-well dishes (Nunclon Multidishes; Nalge Nunc International, Denmark) for
20 h. The COCs were subsequently cultured in the maturation medium without dbcAMP and
hormones for 24 h. The maturation culture was carried out at 39 C in a humidified
atmosphere containing 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2.
In vitro fertilization
After in vitro maturation, COCs were washed three times with modified
Pig-FM (mPig-FM) medium [2], and 15–20 COCs were
transferred into a 90 μl volume of mPig-FM medium. Cryopreserved semen was thawed, and
spermatozoa were washed twice by centrifugation (at 1800 rpm for 3 min) in sperm washing
medium (TCM 199 medium supplemented with 20 mM Hepes, 0.68 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml
penicillin Gpotassium, 100 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate, 0.91 mM sodium pyruvate, 4.12 mM
calcium lactate, 3.0 mM glucose and 10% [v/v] FCS) adjusted to pH 7.8 [23]. The spermatozoa were resuspended in the sperm
washing medium, and 10 μl of this suspension was added to 90 μl of mPig-FM containing
matured COCs. The final sperm concentration was adjusted to 1.0 × 107/ml. COCs
and sperm were incubated for 12 h at 39 C under a 5% CO2, 5% O2, and
90% N2 atmosphere. Following incubation with sperm, presumptive zygotes were
freed from the cumulus cells and attached spermatozoa.
In vitro culture of fertilized embryos
Following IVF, presumptive zygotes were cultured in mNCSU-37 supplemented with 2.7 mM
sodium lactate, 0.17 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 4 mg/ml BSA
(fraction V) at 39 C under a 5% CO2, 5% O2 and 90% N2
atmosphere. On day 2 (the day of IVF was considered day 0), embryos were transferred to
mNCSU-37 media supplemented with 5.56 mM glucose, 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 4 mg/ml
BSA and cultured at 39 C under a 5% CO2, 5% O2 and 90% N2
atmosphere until day 7.
Production of elongated embryos
All experiments using animals were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee, Hokkaido
Animal Research Center, Shintoku, Japan. Prepubertal gilts approximately 205 days of age
were superovulated and mated using artificial insemination (AI) for in
vivo elongated embryo production. A dose of 1500 IU/gilt equine chorionic
gonadotropin (eCG; Yell Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) was administered to donor gilts.
Approximately 72 h after administration of eCG, 1000 IU/gilt hCG (Kyoritsu Seiyaku, Tokyo,
Japan) was administered. Gilts were bred by AI at 18–36 h after administration of hCG. On
day 11 (AI = day 0), two donor gilts were sacrificed, their reproductive tracts removed,
and elongated embryos were collected by retrograde uterine flushing from the horns on both
sides.
Determination of the relative abundances of gene transcripts in porcine
embryos
Under an inverted microscope, blastocysts derived from IVF were divided into the
following two parts using a microsurgical blade (Feather, Osaka, Japan): intact ICM with
surrounding TE cells and a TE portion (Figs. 1A
and 1B). ICM and TE samples obtained from 8–10 different blastocyst embryos were pooled to
form single samples. ICM and TE portions were washed three times in PBS containing 1%
polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), added to 5 μl lysis buffer (0.8% Igepal [ICN Biomedical,
Aurora, OH, USA], 5 mM DTT [Invitrogen], and 1 U/μl RNasin [Promega, Madison, WI, USA]),
snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 C. Recovered elongated embryos were
transferred to 1% PVP-PBS. Elongated embryos in which we could identify both the embryo
disc (ED) and TE were used for analysis (Figs.
1C and 1D). Under a stereomicroscope,
elongated embryos were then divided into the ED and TE regions using a surgical knife. The
TE region was divided into several pieces, approximately 3–5 mm wide. Pieces of ED and TE
from single elongated embryos were washed three times in 1% PVP-PBS. Total RNA was
isolated from pieces of ED and TE using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan)
according to the manufacturer's instructions and stored at –80 C.
Fig. 1.
Representative photographs of porcine blastocyst (A, B) and elongated stage
embryos (C, ovoid; D, filamentous). Scale bars represent 2 mm (C) and 2.5 mm (D).
Arrows indicate the ICM (A, B) or ED (C, D) in embryos. Arrowheads indicate the TE
in embryos (A, B, C, D).
Representative photographs of porcine blastocyst (A, B) and elongated stage
embryos (C, ovoid; D, filamentous). Scale bars represent 2 mm (C) and 2.5 mm (D).
Arrows indicate the ICM (A, B) or ED (C, D) in embryos. Arrowheads indicate the TE
in embryos (A, B, C, D).RNA samples were heated to 80 C for 5 min and reverse transcribed using a QuantiTect
Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The
reaction mixture of blastocyst and elongated stage samples was diluted with DEPC-treated
water to final volumes of 24 μl and 40 μl, respectively. Real-time PCRs were performed
using StepOneTM (Applied Biosystems, Tokyo, Japan), and products were detected
with SYBR Green included in QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen). For each
quantifications, 1.5 or 2 μl of the RT product was used. The amplification program was as
follows: preincubation at 95 C for 15 min to activate HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase (Qiagen),
followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 94 C for 15 sec, annealing of primers at
different temperatures (Table 1) for 30 sec, and elongation at 72 C for 30 sec. After the end of the last
cycle, a melting curve was generated by starting fluorescence acquisition at 60 C and
taking measurements in 0.3 C steps up to 95 C.
Table 1.
Primers used for RT-PCR
Genes
Primer sequences (5´– 3´)a
Annealing temperature (C)
Fragment size (bp)
GenBank accession no.
OCT-4
F- GTTCTCTTTGGGAAGGTGTT
56
313
AJ251914
R- ACACGCCGGACCACATCCTTC
CDX2
F- GTCACCAGAGCTTCTCTGGG
53
144
EU137688
R- AGACCAACAACCCAAACAGC
TEAD4
F- AAGTTCTGGGCAGACCTCAA
60
157
XM_605145
R- GTGCTTCAGCTTGTGGATGA
GATA3
F- CATGTCCTCTCTCAGCCACA
60
206
NM_001044567
R- TGCGAAAATGCACGTAGAAG
NANOG
F- GTACCTCAGCCTCCAGCA
57
161
AJ877915
R- CTGAGCCCTTCTGAATCAC
FGF4
F- TTCTTCGTGGCCATGAGCAG
52
206
XM_003122418
R- AGGAAGTGGGTGACCTTCAT
FGFR1-IIIc
F- ACTGCTGGAGTTAATACCACCG
60
125
AJ577088
R- GCAGAGTGATGGGAGAGTCC
FGFR2-IIIc
F- GGTGTTAACACCACGGACAA
60
139
AJ439896
R- CTGGCAGAACTGTCAACCAT
GAPDH
F- TCGGAGTGAACGGATTTG
60
219
AF017079
R- CCTGGAAGATGGTGATGG
a Primer orientations: F, forward; R, reverse.
a Primer orientations: F, forward; R, reverse.A standard curve was generated for each amplicon by amplifying serial dilutions of a
known quantity. PCR products for each gene were purified using the a QIAquick PCR
Purification Kit (Qiagen), quantified by measuring absorbance at 260 nm using a NanoDrop
spectrophotometer (ND-1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kanagawa, Japan) and diluted as
described. Serial 10-fold dilutions for creating the standard curve were amplified in
every real-time PCR run. The standards and cDNA samples were then co-amplified in the same
reaction prepared from a master mix. Fluorescence was acquired in each cycle to determine
the threshold cycle or in the cycle during the log-linear phase of the reaction at which
the fluorescence rose above the background for each sample. Final quantification was
performed using the StepOneTM quantification software. Expression of the target
gene in each run was normalized to the internal standard, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH).
Statistical analysis
Differences in mRNA expression levels in blastocyst stage embryos were analyzed by the
Mann-Whitney U test. Data regarding mRNA expression levels in elongated stage embryos were
analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by multiple pairwise comparisons using the
Scheffé's method. A P value < 0.05 denoted a statistically significant difference.
Results
Relative expression levels of mRNA transcripts in porcine blastocyst embryos
To describe the expression patterns of the genes involved in the segregation of the ICM
and TE lineages in porcine blastocyst embryos, mRNA transcripts levels of
OCT-4, CDX2, TEAD4,
GATA3, NANOG, FGF4,
FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc in blastocyst embryos (Figs. 1A and
1B) were examined. As shown in Figs. 2A
and 2B, OCT-4 and CDX2 transcripts were detected in both
ICM and TE portions. OCT-4 expression was significantly (P<0.01)
higher in the ICM than in the TE, while the CDX2 expression level did not
differ between the ICM and TE. In addition, the expression ratio of CDX2
to OCT-4 (CDX2/OCT-4) did not differ
between the ICM and TE (Fig. 2C). Like the
CDX2 expression, the TEAD4 and GATA3
expression levels did not differ between the ICM and TE (Figs. 2D and 2E). The
gene expressions of FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc were
significantly (FGF4, P<0.01; FGFR1-IIIc, P<0.05)
higher in the ICM than in the TE (Figs. 2F
and 2G). At the blastocyst stage,
NANOG and FGFR2-IIIc transcripts were not detected in
the ICM and TE portions.
Fig. 2.
Relative abundance (mean ± SE) of (A) OCT-4, (B)
CDX2, (D) TEAD4, (E) GATA3, (F)
FGF4, and (G) FGFR1-IIIc transcripts in porcine
blastocyst embryos (n = 5). (C) The expression ratio of CDX2 to
OCT-4 mRNAs (CDX2/OCT-4) in
porcine blastocyst embryos (n = 5). Expression levels of OCT-4,
CDX2, TEAD4, GATA3,
FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc mRNAs were normalized to
GAPDH expression. a,b Different superscripts indicate
a significant difference (P<0.01–0.05). NANOG and
FGFR2-IIIc mRNA were not detected in porcine blastocyst
embryos.
Relative abundance (mean ± SE) of (A) OCT-4, (B)
CDX2, (D) TEAD4, (E) GATA3, (F)
FGF4, and (G) FGFR1-IIIc transcripts in porcine
blastocyst embryos (n = 5). (C) The expression ratio of CDX2 to
OCT-4 mRNAs (CDX2/OCT-4) in
porcine blastocyst embryos (n = 5). Expression levels of OCT-4,
CDX2, TEAD4, GATA3,
FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc mRNAs were normalized to
GAPDH expression. a,b Different superscripts indicate
a significant difference (P<0.01–0.05). NANOG and
FGFR2-IIIc mRNA were not detected in porcine blastocyst
embryos.
Relative expression levels of mRNA transcripts in porcine elongated embryos
To describe the expression patterns of the genes involved in the segregation of the ICM
and TE lineages in porcine elongated embryos, mRNA transcripts levels of
OCT-4, CDX2, TEAD4,
GATA3, NANOG, FGF4,
FGFR1-IIIc, and FGFR2-IIIc in elongated embryos
(ovoid, 6–10 mm, Fig. 1C; filamentous, ≥100 mm,
Fig. 1D) were examined. As shown in Fig. 3A, OCT-4 expression was observed in the ED, while the expression was
very low in the TE. In contrast, CDX2 expression in ovoid stage embryos
was significantly (P<0.01) higher in the TE than in the ED (Fig. 3B). As embryonic development progressed from the ovoid to
filamentous stage, the expression level of CDX2 was significantly
(P<0.01) reduced in TE lineages (Fig. 3B).
The CDX2/OCT-4 ratio in elongated embryos was markedly
higher in the TE compared with the ED (Fig. 3C).
The TEAD4 expression level in filamentous embryos and
GATA3 expression levels in ovoid and filamentous embryos were
significantly (P<0.01) higher in the TE than in the ED (Figs. 3D and 3E). On the
other hand, NANOG expression was detected in the ED in elongated embryos,
but not in the TE portion (Fig. 3F). The
NANOG expression level was significantly (P<0.05) reduced as
development progressed from the ovoid to filamentous stage (Fig. 3F). The FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc
expression levels were significantly (P<0.01) higher in the ED than in the TE in both
ovoid and filamentous stage embryos (Figs. 3G
and 3H). In addition,
FGFR2-IIIc expression was detected in elongated embryos, and, like the
FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc expressions, was significantly
(P<0.01) higher in ED than in TE (Fig.
3I).
Fig. 3.
Relative abundance (mean ± SE) of (A) OCT-4, (B)
CDX2, (D) TEAD4, (E) GATA3, (F)
NANOG, (G) FGF4, (H) FGFR1-IIIc
and (I) FGFR2-IIIc transcripts in porcine elongated embryos (ovoid
[n = 4] and filamentous [n = 5]). (C) The expression ratio of CDX2
to OCT-4 mRNAs (CDX2/OCT-4) in
porcine elongated embryos (ovoid [n = 4] and filamentous [n = 5]). The bars for the
CDX2/OCT-4 ratio represent a log scale.
Expression levels of OCT-4, CDX2,
TEAD4, GATA3, NANOG,
FGF4, FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc
mRNAs were normalized to GAPDH expression. a,b,c
Different superscripts indicate a significant difference (P<0.01–0.05).
Relative abundance (mean ± SE) of (A) OCT-4, (B)
CDX2, (D) TEAD4, (E) GATA3, (F)
NANOG, (G) FGF4, (H) FGFR1-IIIc
and (I) FGFR2-IIIc transcripts in porcine elongated embryos (ovoid
[n = 4] and filamentous [n = 5]). (C) The expression ratio of CDX2
to OCT-4 mRNAs (CDX2/OCT-4) in
porcine elongated embryos (ovoid [n = 4] and filamentous [n = 5]). The bars for the
CDX2/OCT-4 ratio represent a log scale.
Expression levels of OCT-4, CDX2,
TEAD4, GATA3, NANOG,
FGF4, FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc
mRNAs were normalized to GAPDH expression. a,b,c
Different superscripts indicate a significant difference (P<0.01–0.05).
Discussion
Several studies of mouse embryos have indicated clearly that the segregation of the ICM and
TE lineages is regulated by the mutually antagonistic effect of OCT-4 and CDX2 [8]. At the morula stage, OCT-4 and CDX2 are expressed
throughout the embryo, but after initiation of blastocyst formation, OCT-4 and CDX2
expressions gradually segregate to the ICM and TE, respectively [8]. The OCT-4 and CDX2 proteins form a transcription network by which they
activate their own transcription, while reciprocally suppressing each other's expression.
This transcription network contributes to the establishment of mutually exclusive OCT-4 and
CDX2 expression, and thus establishment of the ICM and TE lineages [8]. On the other hand, in porcine and bovineblastocyst embryos, OCT-4
protein and mRNA are detectable in both the ICM and TE [17, 19, 20, 24, 25]. Thus, Kuijk et al. [20] suggested the possibility that OCT-4 is not involved in defining the
pluripotent ICM population in porcine and bovine embryos. In the present study,
OCT-4 and CDX2 transcripts were detected in both the ICM
and TE at the blastocyst stage. On the other hand, at the elongated stage,
OCT-4 expression appeared to be largely restricted to the ED, consistent
with previous studies of porcine embryos [18, 26, 27]. In
addition, the CDX2 level in ovoid embryos was significantly higher in the
TE than in the ED. Thus, the difference in the CDX2/OCT-4
ratio between ED and TE cells became more clear during development from the blastocyst to
elongated stage. This pattern of OCT-4 and CDX2
expressions observed in porcine embryos is similar to that of bovine embryos [17, 28]. Our
results present a persuasive argument that interplay of OCT-4 and CDX2 could be important
for the segregation and functionalization of the ICM and TE lineages in porcine embryos.
Furthermore, our results indicate the possibility that in porcine embryos, functionalization
of ICM and TE lineage cells caused by interplay of OCT-4 and CDX2 may progress with
development from the blastocyst to elongated stage.In the present study, we used different methods to produce the blastocyst and elongated
stage embryos; blastocyst embryos were obtained from IVF, while elongated embryos were
obtained in vivo. We have acknowledged that in vitro
procedures may affect the expression of several genes in porcine and bovine embryos [29, 30]. However,
we previously reported that in bovineblastocyst embryos, the expression patterns of
OCT-4, CDX2, TEAD4,
GATA3, NANOG and FGF4 genes in ICM and
TE cells did not differ between IVF and in vivo embryos [17]. Thus, in the present study, we considered that it is
possible to discuss the changes in the expression pattern of eight genes in the ICM and TE
lineages during development from blastocysts to elongated embryos.Recently, it has been revealed that TEAD4 and GATA3 play important roles in specification
and development of the TE lineages in mouse embryos [11,12,13]. TEAD4-deficient mouse embryos did not express CDX2 gene
after the morula stage, and these embryos exhibited defects in the specification of the TE
lineage [12, 13]. Knockdown of GATA3 by RNA interference also reduced
CDX2 expression and inhibited the morula to blastocyst transformation
[11]. These findings suggest that TEAD4 and GATA3
regulate TE development through a pathway that requires the activation of CDX2 expression.
In mouseblastocysts, TEAD4 expression was observed in both the ICM and TE [12], while GATA3 was selectively expressed in the TE
portion [11]. In this study, TEAD4
and GATA3 mRNA were found to be expressed in both the ICM and TE portions,
and their expression levels did not differ between the ICM and TE. These patterns of
TEAD4 and GATA3 expression in blastocyst embryos are
similar to those we described previously in bovine embryos [17]. On the other hand, in elongated embryos, TEAD4 and
GATA3 expression levels were higher in the TE than in the ED. These
results may be linked to the expression pattern of CDX2 in the ED and TE at
the ovoid stage. However, although the TEAD4 expression level was
maintained from the ovoid to filamentous stage, CDX2 expression was
remarkably downregulated. Recently, Home et al. [31] reported that subcellular localization of TEAD4 is important for
regulation of expression for target genes, such as CDX2 in mammalian
species. Thus, further analyses such as immunohistochemistry were necessary to uncover the
transcription network between TEAD4, GATA3, and
CDX2 in porcine embryos. The present study is the first to demonstrate
the changes in the expression of TEAD4 and GATA3 mRNAs
during porcine preimplantation development, and our findings suggest the possibility that
TEAD4 and GATA3 participate in the regulation of TE development in porcine preimplantation
embryos.NANOG is an ICM-specific transcription factor under the control of OCT-4 [32] that is expressed in early mouseblastocysts. Like
OCT-4 and CDX2, NANOG and CDX2 mutually repress the expression of the other, suggesting that
NANOG is also involved in the regulation of the segregation of the ICM and TE lineages
[10]. In the present study, the
NANOG transcript was not detected at the blastocyst stage, but was
exclusively expressed in the ED of elongated embryos, corroborating previous reports in
porcine embryos [18, 26]. In addition, NANOG expression levels were reduced as the
embryos transitioned from the ovoid to filamentous stage. Recently, Wolf et
al. [27] demonstrated that NANOG is
downregulated in the epiblast as the primitive streak develops. Although the timing of
NANOG expression between mouse and porcine embryos is different, these
findings indicate that NANOG expression may be involved in the maintenance
of pluripotency in ICM lineage (the ED) cells in porcine embryos.Fibroblast growth factors bind to a group of FGF receptors (FGFRs) with tyrosine kinase
activity. The FGF4 isoform interacts primarily with FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc [33, 34]. In the
mouse embryos, it is established that the FGF4 signaling pathway is required for maintaining
the proliferation of TE cells [16, 35, 36]. FGF4 is
highly expressed in the ICM and epiblast, and activates the membrane-associated FGFR2
expressed by the TE lineage [37, 38]. Embryos with targeted disruption of
FGF4 or FGFR2 show peri-implantation lethality, caused
by defects in functional ICM formation as well as a placental defect [14, 15], which together indicate
the importance of the FGF4 signaling pathway for proliferation and differentiation of both
the ICM and TE cells. In the present study, we demonstrated that FGF4 is
expressed in porcine preimplantation embryos. In blastocyst embryos, expression of
FGF4 and FGFR1-IIIc was significantly higher in the ICM
than in the TE. Furthermore, these gene expression patterns were maintained in the elongated
embryos. These findings suggest that FGF4-FGFR1-IIIc signaling may be important for
segregation and proliferation of the ICM lineage in porcine embryos. On the other hand,
FGFR2-IIIc mRNA was not detected in porcine blastocysts. However,
FGFR2-IIIc expression was detected in both the ED and TE portions of the
elongated embryos, which indicates the possibility that FGF4 from the ED portion activates
the FGFR2-IIIc, and this signaling functions in the differentiation and proliferation of the
ED and TE in porcine elongated embryos as seen in the mouse embryos. In addition, Powers
et al. [31] reported that
FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc are also activated by FGF1, 2, 6 and 9. Thus, it is possible that
these other FGF isoforms also activate FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc in porcine elongated
embryos, and thereby regulate the differentiation and proliferation of the ED and TE.In conclusion, we demonstrated dramatic changes in the expression patterns of
OCT-4, CDX2, TEAD4,
GATA3, NANOG, FGF4,
FGFR1-IIIc and FGFR2-IIIc genes in ICM and TE lineage
cells during porcine preimplantation development. Changes in the expression patterns
concomitant with embryonic stage transition suggests that these genes may help guide the
segregation and functionalization of the ICM and TE lineages in porcine preimplantation
embryos. In the mouse embryos, the expressions of most genes involved in the segregation of
the ICM and TE were restricted in ICM or TE cells at the blastocyst stage, and regulate the
ICM and TE cell functions. Thus, in mouse embryos, morphological and functional segregation
of the ICM and TE lineages occurred at the blastocyst stage. On the other hand, our findings
suggest that in porcine embryo, the functions of ICM and TE lineages cells depend on these
gene expressions might proceed as transition from blastocyst to elongated stage, which
indicates the possibility of differences in the molecular mechanism that regulates early
lineage segregation between species. Further studies, such as immnohistochemical analysis
and knockdown of target genes by siRNA, are necessary to obtain better understanding for the
mechanism of early lineage segregation in porcine embryos.
Authors: Pratik Home; Biswarup Saha; Soma Ray; Debasree Dutta; Sumedha Gunewardena; Byunggil Yoo; Arindam Pal; Jay L Vivian; Melissa Larson; Margaret Petroff; Patrick G Gallagher; Vincent P Schulz; Kenneth L White; Thaddeus G Golos; Barry Behr; Soumen Paul Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Schlessinger; A N Plotnikov; O A Ibrahimi; A V Eliseenkova; B K Yeh; A Yayon; R J Linhardt; M Mohammadi Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 17.970