Rachel F McCloud1, Cassandra A Okechukwu2, Glorian Sorensen3, K Viswanath3,2. 1. Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA Rachel_Faulkenberry@dfci.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Communication inequalities deepen health disparities even when internet access is achieved. The goal of this study is to understand how a range of barriers may inhibit individuals from low socioeconomic position (SEP) from engaging with online health information even when it is freely available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed data were collected from 118 low-SEP individuals from a randomized controlled trial providing internet access. Measures triangulated the health-seeking experience through internet use tracked in real-time, call log data, and self-reported barriers. Negative binomial regression models were fitted with technology and perceived predictors, and our outcome, health information seeking, and then stratified by medical status. RESULTS: Participants experienced a median of two computer issues (median 6 days) and two internet issues (median 6.5 days). Duration of internet problems was associated with a decrease in the rate of internet health information seeking by a factor of 0.990 (P = .03) for each additional day. Participants with a medical problem who were frustrated in their search for health information had half the rate of health information seeking of those who were not frustrated (incidence rate ratio = 0.395, P = .030). DISCUSSION: Despite IT support, participants still experienced internet connectivity issues that negatively impacted their health information seeking. Frustration in their search to find information may serve as an additional barrier to those who have medical issues. CONCLUSION: After initial internet access, a second-level digital divide emerged due to connectivity issues, highlighting the need to understand the complex network of barriers experienced by low-SEP internet users.
OBJECTIVE:Communication inequalities deepen health disparities even when internet access is achieved. The goal of this study is to understand how a range of barriers may inhibit individuals from low socioeconomic position (SEP) from engaging with online health information even when it is freely available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed data were collected from 118 low-SEP individuals from a randomized controlled trial providing internet access. Measures triangulated the health-seeking experience through internet use tracked in real-time, call log data, and self-reported barriers. Negative binomial regression models were fitted with technology and perceived predictors, and our outcome, health information seeking, and then stratified by medical status. RESULTS:Participants experienced a median of two computer issues (median 6 days) and two internet issues (median 6.5 days). Duration of internet problems was associated with a decrease in the rate of internet health information seeking by a factor of 0.990 (P = .03) for each additional day. Participants with a medical problem who were frustrated in their search for health information had half the rate of health information seeking of those who were not frustrated (incidence rate ratio = 0.395, P = .030). DISCUSSION: Despite IT support, participants still experienced internet connectivity issues that negatively impacted their health information seeking. Frustration in their search to find information may serve as an additional barrier to those who have medical issues. CONCLUSION: After initial internet access, a second-level digital divide emerged due to connectivity issues, highlighting the need to understand the complex network of barriers experienced by low-SEP internet users.
Authors: James B Weaver; Darren Mays; Gregg Lindner; Dogan Eroglu; Frederick Fridinger; Jay M Bernhardt Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Neeraj K Arora; Pauley Johnson; David H Gustafson; Fiona McTavish; Robert P Hawkins; Suzanne Pingree Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2002-05
Authors: Young Ji Lee; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Elaine Larson; Adam Wilcox; Suzanne Bakken Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: W Scott Comulada; Cameron Goldbeck; Ellen Almirol; Heather J Gunn; Manuel A Ocasio; M Isabel Fernández; Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold; Adriana Romero-Espinoza; Stacey Urauchi; Wilson Ramos; Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus; Jeffrey D Klausner; Dallas Swendeman Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2021-05-11
Authors: Lila J Finney Rutten; Kelly D Blake; Alexandra J Greenberg-Worisek; Summer V Allen; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Savanna L Carson; Clemens Hong; Heidi Behforouz; Emily Chang; Lydia Z Dixon; Diane Factor; Sheba M George; Jenebah Lewis; Angelina Majeno; Maria Morales; Courtney Porter; Ami Shah; Stefanie D Vassar; Arleen F Brown Journal: J Ambul Care Manage Date: 2022 Jan-Mar 01
Authors: Ruth A Bush; Vijaya M Vemulakonda; Andrew C Richardson; Sara J Deakyne Davies; George J Chiang Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Erika A Waters; Jennifer M Taber; Amy McQueen; Ashley J Housten; Jamie L Studts; Laura D Scherer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 4.254