Ángel Chávez Mendoza1, Beatriz Buentello Volante2, María Esther Ocharán Hernández3, Claudia Camelia Calzada Mendoza3, Arturo Flores Pliego4, Héctor A Baptista Gonzalez5, Higinio Estrada Juárez5. 1. Posgrado en Investigación en Medicina, Laboratorio de Señalización Celular, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México, D.F., Mexico; Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias de la Salud, Unidad Santo Tomás, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. de Los Maestros S/N, Col. Santo Tomas, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, C.P. 11340 Ciudad de México, D.F., Mexico; Hospital General "Dr. Fernando Quiroz Gutiérrez", ISSSTE, General Felipe Ángeles y Canario S/N, Col. Bellavista, Delegación Álvaro Obregón, C.P. 01140 Ciudad de México, D.F., Mexico. 2. Departamento de Genética, Unidad de Investigación, Instituto de Oftalmología "Conde de Valenciana", Chimalpopoca 14, Col. Obrera, Delegación Cuauhtémoc, C.P. 06800 Ciudad de México, D.F., Mexico. 3. Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Laboratorio de Señalización Celular, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón s/n, Col. Santo Tomas, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, C.P. 11340 Ciudad de México, D.F., Mexico. 4. Departamento de Inmunobioquimica, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Montes Urales 800 Col. Virreyes, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, C.P. 11000 Ciudad de México, D.F., Mexico. 5. Coordinación de Hematología Perinatal, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Montes Urales 800 Col. Virreyes, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, C.P. 11000 Ciudad de México, D.F., Mexico.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obtaining high quality genomic DNA safely and economically is vital for diverse studies of large populations aimed at evaluating the role of genetic factors in susceptibility to disease. AIM: This study was to test a protocol for the extraction of high quality genomic DNA from saliva samples obtained with mouthwash and taken from patients with periodontal disease. METHODS: Saliva samples were taken from 60 patients and then stored at room temperature. DNA extraction was carried out at distinct post-sampling times (10, 20 and 30 days). Evaluation of genomic DNA was performed with spectrophotometry, electrophoresis, and PCR genotyping and sequencing. RESULTS: The greatest concentration of DNA obtained was 352 μg at 10 days post-sampling, followed by 121.025 μg and 19.59 μg at 20 and 30 days, respectively. When determining the purity of DNA with the spectrophotometric ratio of 260/230, the relations of 1.20, 1.40 and 0.781 were obtained for 10, 20 and 30 days, respectively. In all samples, it was possible to amplify the product of 485 bp and the sequence of the amplicons showed 95% similarity to the reference sequence. CONCLUSION: The present protocol represents an easy, safe and economical technique for obtaining high quality genomic DNA.
BACKGROUND: Obtaining high quality genomic DNA safely and economically is vital for diverse studies of large populations aimed at evaluating the role of genetic factors in susceptibility to disease. AIM: This study was to test a protocol for the extraction of high quality genomic DNA from saliva samples obtained with mouthwash and taken from patients with periodontal disease. METHODS: Saliva samples were taken from 60 patients and then stored at room temperature. DNA extraction was carried out at distinct post-sampling times (10, 20 and 30 days). Evaluation of genomic DNA was performed with spectrophotometry, electrophoresis, and PCR genotyping and sequencing. RESULTS: The greatest concentration of DNA obtained was 352 μg at 10 days post-sampling, followed by 121.025 μg and 19.59 μg at 20 and 30 days, respectively. When determining the purity of DNA with the spectrophotometric ratio of 260/230, the relations of 1.20, 1.40 and 0.781 were obtained for 10, 20 and 30 days, respectively. In all samples, it was possible to amplify the product of 485 bp and the sequence of the amplicons showed 95% similarity to the reference sequence. CONCLUSION: The present protocol represents an easy, safe and economical technique for obtaining high quality genomic DNA.
Authors: L C Harty; M Garcia-Closas; N Rothman; Y A Reid; M A Tucker; P Hartge Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: L Le Marchand; A Lum-Jones; B Saltzman; V Visaya; A M Nomura; L N Kolonel Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Irena B King; Jessie Satia-Abouta; Mark D Thornquist; Jeannette Bigler; Ruth E Patterson; Alan R Kristal; Ann L Shattuck; John D Potter; Emily White; Jessie Satia Abouta Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: A Albert-Kiszely; B E Pjetursson; G E Salvi; J Witt; A Hamilton; G R Persson; N P Lang Journal: J Clin Periodontol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 8.728
Authors: Matthew Kearse; Richard Moir; Amy Wilson; Steven Stones-Havas; Matthew Cheung; Shane Sturrock; Simon Buxton; Alex Cooper; Sidney Markowitz; Chris Duran; Tobias Thierer; Bruce Ashton; Peter Meintjes; Alexei Drummond Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 6.937