Literature DB >> 12376522

Buccal cell DNA yield, quality, and collection costs: comparison of methods for large-scale studies.

Irena B King1, Jessie Satia-Abouta, Mark D Thornquist, Jeannette Bigler, Ruth E Patterson, Alan R Kristal, Ann L Shattuck, John D Potter, Emily White, Jessie Satia Abouta.   

Abstract

There is considerable interest in noninvasive and cost-effective methods for obtaining DNA in large-scale studies. In this randomized crossover study of 22 participants, we compared the DNA yield, quality, and associated costs of buccal cell DNA collected using cytobrushes (three brushes per collection) and swish (i.e., mouthwash) in self-administered procedures. There was a nonstatistically significant higher yield from the mouthwash compared with cytobrush collections (15.8 microg versus 12.0 microg, respectively; P = 0.53). PCR reactions that required short (0.3 kb) or intermediate (1.1 kb) DNA fragments were 100% successful for DNA from brush and mouthwash, whereas PCRs for reactions that required long fragments (7.8 kb) failed for all of the participants from cytobrush DNA and were 81% successful for DNA from the mouthwash source. The brush collections provided sufficient DNA for an estimated 150-225 PCR reactions requiring short and intermediate DNA fragments. The estimated per person costs for buccal brush DNA collections in large studies were less then half (8.50 dollars) those for the mouthwash method (18 dollars). In addition, we tested whether cytobrush instructions to rub cheeks before collection or collect cells only in the morning increased DNA yield and whether repeat brushings of the same cheek reduced DNA yield. These variations resulted in no significant differences in DNA yields. We conclude that the collection of DNA with cytobrushes using simple instructions is cost effective in large-scale studies, and yields sufficient quantity and quality of DNA for genotyping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12376522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  37 in total

1.  New saliva DNA collection method compared to buccal cell collection techniques for epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Nikki L Rogers; Shelley A Cole; Hao-Chang Lan; Aldo Crossa; Ellen W Demerath
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.937

2.  A simple method of genomic DNA extraction from human samples for PCR-RFLP analysis.

Authors:  Souvik Ghatak; Rajendra Bose Muthukumaran; Senthil Kumar Nachimuthu
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2013-12

3.  Buccal cells DNA extraction to obtain high quality human genomic DNA suitable for polymorphism genotyping by PCR-RFLP and Real-Time PCR.

Authors:  Erika Calvano Küchler; Patricia Nivoloni Tannure; Priscila Falagan-Lotsch; Taliria Silva Lopes; Jose Mauro Granjeiro; Lidia Maria Fonte Amorim
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  A Hierarchical Factor Model of Executive Functions in Adolescents: Evidence of Gene-Environment Interplay.

Authors:  James J Li; Tammy A Chung; Michael M Vanyukov; D Scott Wood; Robert Ferrell; Duncan B Clark
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  How to Transition from Single-Gene Pharmacogenetic Testing to Preemptive Panel-Based Testing: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Richard J Marrero; Emily J Cicali; Meghan J Arwood; Elizabeth Eddy; David DeRemer; Brian H Ramnaraign; Karen C Daily; Dennie Jones; Kelsey J Cook; Larisa H Cavallari; Kristin Wiisanen Weitzel; Taimour Langaee; Kimberly J Newsom; Petr Starostik; Michael J Clare-Salzer; Julie A Johnson; Thomas J George; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Comparison of biological specimens and DNA collection methods for PCR amplification and microarray analysis.

Authors:  Jasmine A Rethmeyer; Xiaoyu Tan; Ann Manzardo; Stephen R Schroeder; Merlin G Butler
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Using a commercially available DNA extraction kit to obtain high quality human genomic DNA suitable for PCR and genotyping from 11-year-old saliva saturated cotton spit wads.

Authors:  Erik A Ehli; Timea Lengyel-Nelson; James J Hudziak; Gareth E Davies
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2008-12-22

8.  Rationales, design and recruitment of the Taizhou Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Wang; Ming Lu; Ji Qian; Yajun Yang; Shilin Li; Daru Lu; Shunzhang Yu; Wei Meng; Weimin Ye; Li Jin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Determinants of DNA yield and purity collected with buccal cell samples.

Authors:  D B M A van Wieren-de Wijer; A H Maitland-van der Zee; A de Boer; S V Belitser; A A Kroon; P W de Leeuw; P Schiffers; R G J H Janssen; C M van Duijn; B H C H Stricker; O H Klungel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes.

Authors:  Tetyana Zayats; Terri L Young; David A Mackey; François Malecaze; Patrick Calvas; Jeremy A Guggenheim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.