Literature DB >> 16895942

Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery.

Katherine Baicker1, Kasey S Buckles, Amitabh Chandra.   

Abstract

There is enormous geographic variation in the use of cesarean delivery: For births over 2,500 grams, adjusted cesarean rates vary fourfold between low- and high-use areas. Even for births under 2,500 grams, high-use counties have rates that are double those of low-use ones. Higher cesarean rates are only partially explained by patient characteristics but are greatly influenced by nonmedical factors such as provider density, the capacity of the local health care system, and malpractice pressure. Areas with higher usage rates perform the intervention in medically less appropriate populations-that is, relatively healthier births-and do not see improvements in maternal or neonatal mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16895942     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  37 in total

1.  The association between hospital obstetrical volume and maternal postpartum complications.

Authors:  Kathy L Kyser; Xin Lu; Donna A Santillan; Mark K Santillan; Stephen K Hunter; Alison G Cahill; Peter Cram
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Adoption of diagnostic technology and variation in caesarean section rates: a test of the practice style hypothesis in Norway.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Lars Monkerud; Rune Sørensen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Neonatal mortality risk for repeat cesarean compared to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States, 1998-2002 birth cohorts.

Authors:  Fay Menacker; Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-03

4.  Utility of the 5-Minute Apgar Score as a Research Endpoint.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg; Mekhala V Dissanayake; Melissa Cheyney; Jennifer Brown; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Judy Jou; Katy B Kozhimannil; Pamela Jo Johnson; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Exposure analysis methods impact associations between maternal physical activity and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Kelly R Evenson; William Goodnight
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-02-05

7.  Are dual eligibles admitted to poorer quality skilled nursing facilities?

Authors:  Momotazur Rahman; David C Grabowski; Pedro L Gozalo; Kali S Thomas; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Michael R Law; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  "Chasing a Ghost": Factors that Influence Primary Care Physicians to Follow Up on Incidental Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Eva K Bugos; Curtis P Langlotz; Rosemary Frasso
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Cesarean and VBAC rates among immigrant vs. native-born women: a retrospective observational study from Taiwan Cesarean delivery and VBAC among immigrant women in Taiwan.

Authors:  Jung-Chung Fu; Sudha Xirasagar; Jihong Liu; Janice C Probst
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.