| Literature DB >> 27191271 |
Qin Hu1, Qiji Liu2, Shasha Wang1, Xi Zhen1, Zhimian Zhang3, Ruijuan Lv4, Guihua Jiang1, Zhiyong Ma1, Hong He1, Daqing Li1, Xiaoling Liu1, Fei Gao1, Jifu Li1, Li Li1, Mei Zhang1, Xiaoping Ji1, Yuguo Chen4, Daowen Wang5, Dejia Huang6, Aiqun Ma7, Wei Huang8, Yuxia Zhao1, Yaoqin Gong2, Cheng Zhang1, Yun Zhang1.
Abstract
To find a new locus that confers significant susceptibility to CAD in Chinese Han population, a genome-wide association study in 200 "extreme individuals" from a Shandong cohort and a pathway-based candidate gene study from a Shanghai cohort (293 CAD/293 controls) were simultaneously performed. Amongst them, 13 SNPs associated with CAD were selected to conduct validation and replication studies in additional 3363 CAD patients and 3148 controls. A novel locus rs700926 in natriuretic peptide receptor C (NPR-C) was identified in Shandong and Hubei cohorts. Then rs700926 and other nine tag SNPs were genotyped in four geographically different populations (Shandong, Shaanxi, Hubei and Sichuan cohorts), and 6 SNPs (rs700926, rs1833529, rs2270915, rs17541471, rs3792758 and rs696831) showed stronger association with CAD, regardless of single or combined analysis. We further genotyped rs2270915 and 10 additional tag SNPs in a central China cohort and identified rs12697273 and rs10066436 as the loci associated with CAD. All these positive associations remained significant after adjustment for traditional risk factors of CAD. NPR-C gene SNPs significantly contribute to CAD susceptibility in the Chinese Han population.Entities:
Keywords: Pathology Section; coronary artery disease; genome-wide association studies; natriuretic peptide receptor C; single nucleotide polymorphisms; susceptibility gene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27191271 PMCID: PMC5085110 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Characteristics of the study population
| Population | Age | Gender Female | Hypertension | Diabetes | BMI kg/m2 | Hyperlipidemia | Ever/current Smokers | MI | PCI | CABG n(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case( | 44.9±4.81 | 20(20.0) | 20(20.0) | 4(4.0) | 25.1±8.5 | 4(4.0) | 32(32.0) | 42(42.0) | 56(56.0) | 4(4.0) | |
| Control( | 62.3 ±6.7 | 22(22.0) | 78(78.0) | 26(26.0) | NA | 32(32.0) | 58(58.0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| Case( | 63.3±10.5 | 113(38.6) | 182(62.1) | 80(27.3) | 24.1±2.8 | 197(67.2) | 116(39.6) | NA | NA | NA | |
| Control( | 63.3±10.6 | 113(38.6) | 197(67.2) | 20(6.8) | 23.9±3.2 | 182(62.2) | 77(26.3) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| Case( | 59.9±9.5 | 116(24.2) | 276(57.5) | 104(21.7) | 26.0±3.2 | 132(27.5) | 258(53.8) | 301(62.7) | 257(53.5) | 22(4.6) | |
| Control( | 40.8±12.8 | 194(41.4) | 3(0.006) | 2(0.004) | 24.8±3.5 | 1(0.002) | 119(25.3) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| Case( | 59.8±11.8 | 156(22.5) | 425(61.2) | 134(19.3) | 24.4±3.5 | 79(11.4) | 389(56.1) | 319(46.0) | 247(35.6) | 9(1.3) | |
| Control( | 49.5±10.2 | 598(59.0) | 4(0.004) | 3(0.003) | 22.8±2.6 | 1(0.001) | 19(1.9) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| Case( | 60.1±12.3 | 83(21.2) | 183(46.7) | 69(17.6) | 24.7±4.2 | 16(17.4) | 197(50.3) | 101(25.8) | 276(70.4) | 7 (1.8) | |
| Control( | 40.4±18.1 | 115(48.7) | 1(0.004) | 1(0.004) | 22.74±3.4 | 1(0.004) | 35 (14.8) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| Case( | 65.9±10.8 | 90(18.8) | 253(52.7) | 100(20.8) | 24.6±5.8 | 67(14.0) | 273(56.9) | 140(29.2) | 464(96.7) | 8(1. 7) | |
| Control( | 54.1±16.1 | 245(53.2) | 2(0.004) | 3(0.006) | 23.7±4.7 | 1(0.002) | 55 (12.0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| Case( | 65.3±10.8 | 272(26.6) | 662(64.7) | 182(17.8) | 24.1±2.8 | 91(8.9) | 342(33.4) | NA | NA | NA | |
| Control( | 60.2±9.0 | 386(54.3) | 348(49.0) | 58(8.2) | 24.1±4.1 | 29(4.1) | 151(21.2) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| NA | NA | NA | |||||||||
Age of cases and Age of controls, age at the time of enrollment. Data for age and BMI are shown as mean ± standard deviation. We used χ2 tests to compare the differences between gender, hypertension, type 2 diabetes and smoking status. We used a Student's t test to compare the means of the cases and controls. NA, no data; NS: no significant; BMI, body mass index;
Age in years.
Allelic association of SNPs of NPR-C with coronary artery disease in Rep-Shandong, Rep-Hubei, Re-Sichuan and Re-Shaanxi cohorts
| SNP_ID | Minor Allele | Re-Shandong | Re-Hubei | Re-Sichuani | Re-Shaanxi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAF(%) | OR(95%CI) | P-obs | MAF(%) | OR(95%CI) | P-obs | MAF(%) | OR(95%CI) | P-obs | MAF(%) | OR(95%CI) | P-obs | ||||||
| Case | Control | Case | Control | Case | Control | Case | Control | ||||||||||
| G | 23.6 | 19.4 | 1.34(1.07-1.52) | 3.2E-4 | 26.0 | 19.1 | 1.42(1.17-1.59) | 5.4E-5 | 24.1 | 19.6 | 1.40(1.08-1.51) | 1.4E-5 | 26.3 | 21.4 | 1.25(0.95-1.44) | 2.2E-4 | |
| G | 22.2 | 19.3 | 1.30(1.15-1.48) | 1.5E-4 | 23.4 | 17.9 | 1.35(1.09-1.57) | 1.5E-5 | 21.0 | 15.0 | 1.45(1.05-163) | 2.9E-5 | 23.7 | 17.5 | 1.38(1.01-1.45) | 8.5E-4 | |
| G | 20.1 | 14.9 | 1.43(1.12-1.83) | 3.8E-3 | 20.9 | 17.6 | 1.23(1.10-152) | 0.05 | 21.0 | 15.0 | 1.51(1.10-1.73) | 1.7E-3- | 21.5 | 16.8 | 1.38(1.10-1.78) | 5.1E-4 | |
| C | 17.2 | 14.0 | 1.29(1.05-1.61) | 0.02 | 17.5 | 13.4 | 1.31(1.08-1.69) | 0.01 | 17.0 | 13.0 | 1.30(1.03-1.61) | 0.07 | 18.0 | 13.2 | 1.40(1.05-1.65) | 0.01 | |
| T | 17.1 | 13.1 | 1.32(1.10-1.61) | 3.0E-3 | 18.4 | 12.8 | 1.54(1.20-1.99) | 7.7E-4 | 17.0 | 12.5 | 1.61(1.10-1.82) | 5.1E-3 | 17.5 | 13.0 | 1.43(1.10-1.75) | 1.0E-3 | |
| T | 19.1 | 15.4 | 1.38(1.12-1.75) | 0.02 | 17.3 | 13.7 | 1.32(1.02-1.70) | 0.03 | 18.3 | 15.0 | 1.40(1.06-1.70) | 0.01 | 18.1 | 13.4 | 1.37(1.12-1.75) | 0.04 | |
| A | 12.1 | 11.2 | 1.20(0.93-1.30) | 0.49 | 11. 7 | 9.6 | 1.25(0.94-1.65) | 0.12 | 11.2 | 10.0 | 1.23(0.95-1.37) | 0.13 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 0.98(0.69-1.40) | 0.93 | |
| G | 25.4 | 24.5 | 1.25(1.02-1.25) | 0.65 | 26.1 | 25.5 | 1.29(1.00-1.67) | 0.05 | 25.3 | 24.9 | 1.20(1.00-1.20) | 0.98 | 251 | 24.6 | 1.18(0.95-1.20) | 0.84 | |
| T | 13.6 | 14.5 | 0.92(0.71-1.21) | 0.57 | 12.7 | 11.6 | 1.11(0.90-1.37) | 0.34 | 14.6 | 13.9 | 1.10(0.98-1.27) | 0.81 | 14.1 | 13.6 | 1.01(0.98-1.28) | 0.71 | |
| G | 29.2 | 27.0 | 1.00(0.85-1.14) | 0.21 | 28.5 | 27.0 | 1.05(0.95-1.15) | 0.54 | 28.0 | 27.5 | 1.02(0.79-1.10) | 0.69 | 29.3 | 27.1 | 1.12(0.98-1.21) | 0.32 | |
MAF: minor allele frequency.
OR, odds ratio. CI, confidence interval.
P-obs, uncorrected P value.
Allelic association of SNPs of NPR-C with coronary artery disease in 4 combined cohorts (Rep-Shandong, Rep-Hubei, Re-Sichuan and Re-Shaanxi)
| SNP_ID | Position | Allele | MAF(%) | OR(95%CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | |||||||
| 32745283 | G | 24.9 | 19.7 | 0.37 | 1.36(1.17-1.57) | 5.0E-7 | 1.2E-6 | |
| 32734140 | G | 22.9 | 18.5 | 0.45 | 1.31(1.12-1.52) | 3.0E-6 | 1.0E-5 | |
| 32786389 | G | 20.5 | 16.3 | 0.89 | 1.33(1.13-1.55) | 5.7E-6 | 9.0E-6 | |
| 32755589 | C | 18.4 | 12.8 | 0.33 | 1.54(1.20-1.99) | 8.2E-6 | 2.0E-5 | |
| 32745752 | T | 22.5 | 19.0 | 0.53 | 1.24(1.04-1.47) | 0.014 | 0.026 | |
| 32725531 | T | 17.1 | 13.7 | 0.67 | 1.30(1.03-1.64) | 0.029 | 0.041 | |
| 32689875 | A | 11.8 | 11.0 | 0.78 | 1.08(0.89-1.31) | 0.454 | 0.598 | |
| 32689718 | G | 25.3 | 24.8 | 0.82 | 1.29(1.00-1.67) | 0.053 | 0.071 | |
| 32691416 | T | 12.7 | 11.6 | 0.98 | 1.11(0.90-1.37) | 0.343 | 0.542 | |
| 32722499 | G | 36.9 | 37.1 | 0.74 | 0.99(0.86-1.14) | 0.752 | 0.915 | |
P-HW, P value for Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium analysis.
OR, odds ratio, CI, confidence interval.
P-obs, uncorrected P value.
P-adj, P value obtained after adjustment for gender, age, hypertension and diabetes.
Allelic association of SNPs of NPR-C with coronary artery disease in Central Chinese Han population
| Population | SNP_ID | Position | MAF(%) | Allele | OR(95%CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| case | control | |||||||
| rs9716700 | 32711633 | 0 | 0 | A | 1 | |||
| rs11750438 | 32716535 | 0.143357 | 0.121993 | T | 0.83(0.59-1.17) | 0.297177 | ||
| rs6889608 | 32719693 | 0.305263 | 0.261168 | T | 0.80(0.62-1.04) | 0.0734387 | ||
| rs10036648 | 32724078 | 0.166084 | 0.146048 | G | 1.16(0.85-1.60) | 0.040828 | ||
| rs12697273/10037355 | 32730464 | 0.258741 | 0.185567 | T | 0.65(0.49-0.86) | 0.0088942 | ||
| rs10066436 | 32740346 | 0.255245 | 0.183849 | T | 0.66(0.50-0.87) | 0.0111536 | ||
| rs3828586 | 32746547 | 0.265734 | 0.197595 | G | 1.47(1.12-1.94) | 0.021309 | ||
| rs10061804 | 32748637 | 0.265734 | 0.197595 | A | 0.68(0.52-0.90) | 0.021309 | ||
| rs2062708 | 32753672 | 0.185315 | 0.146048 | C | 1.33(0.97-1.82) | 0.142288 | ||
| rs7730564 | 32767727 | 0.185315 | 0.14433 | G | 1.35(0.99-1.84) | 0.118293 | ||
| rs2270915 | 32786389 | 0.20979 | 0.185567 | G | 1.17(0.87-1.56) | 0.0460445 | ||
| rs9716700 | 32711633 | 0 | 0.000661 | A | 0.424719 | |||
| rs10036648 | 32724078 | 0.171329 | 0.155378 | G | 1.12(0.94-1.35) | 0.290962 | ||
| rs12697273/10037355 | 32730464 | 0.1865 | 0.220961 | T | 1.24(1.05-1.46) | 0.0107192 | ||
| rs10066436 | 32740346 | 0.182548 | 0.22237 | T | 1.28(1.08-1.51) | 0.00484991 | ||
| rs3828586 | 32746547 | 0.202663 | 0.236037 | G | 0.82(0.70-0.97) | 0.0592019 | ||
| rs10061804 | 32748637 | 0.203156 | 0.225033 | A | 1.14(0.97-1.34) | 0.295754 | ||
| rs2270915 | 32786389 | 0.174729 | 0.181941 | G | 0.95(0.80-1.13) | 0.688235 | ||
| rs12697273/10037355 | 32730464 | 1.2E-3 | ||||||
| rs10066436 | 32740346 | 1.5E-4 | ||||||
MAF: minor allele frequency.
OR, odds ratio. CI, confidence interval.
P-obs, uncorrected P value.
P-adj, P value obtained after adjustment for gender, age, hypertension, and diabetes.
Figure 2Block structure of linkage disequilibrium for the tag SNPs in the natriuretic peptide receptor C gene region (NPR-C) on chromosome 5p13.3
The linkage disequilibrium (LD) of the tag SNPs with other SNPs were assessed respectively using the data from HapMap by a D' > 0.9 and an r2 > 0.7 as standard. Note that rs700926 has relatively strong representativeness of rs1833529, rs17541471, rs3792758 and rs3828586.
Allelic association of rs12697273 and rs10066436 with coronary artery disease in Rep-Shandong and Rep-Hubei cohorts
| SNP_ID | Population | MAF(%) | Allele | OR(95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| case | control | |||||
| rs12697273 | Rep-Shandong | 0.17314 | 0.196203 | T | 0.86(0.64-1.15) | 0.3111427 |
| Rep-Wuhan | 0.209239 | 0.188716 | T | 1.14(0.90-1.14) | 0.28547 | |
| Combined | 0.18559 | 0.190476 | T | 0.94(0.80-1.11) | 0.48005526 | |
| rs10066436 | Rep-Shandong | 0.19237 | 0.201721 | T | 1.07(0.80-1.41) | 0.375217 |
| Rep-Wuhan | 0.213043 | 0.192308 | T | 1.14(0.85-1.52) | 0.387946891 | |
| Combined | 0.201325 | 0.193023 | T | 1.10(0.83-1.40) | 0.573591 | |
MAF: minor allele frequency.
OR, odds ratio. CI, confidence interval.
P-obs, uncorrected P value.
Figure 3Association of the risk allele G of rs700926 with decreased expression of NPR-C mRNA assuming a dominant model
Because rs700926 is located near intron 1 of NPR-C, we hypothesized that it may affect the expression levels of the NPR-C mRNA. A. 5 individuals with a minor genotype of GG, 27 individuals with genotype GT and 63 individuals with genotype TT of rs700926 were selected for RT-PCR analysis. B. To validate the finding of a quantitative expression trait locus from the initial analysis, a replication study was also performed in an independent population of 380 randomly selected individuals from the replication populations (northern and southern Chinese).
Figure 1Flow chart of the present study
The stage 1 discovery study enrolled two cohorts of populations: a GWAS-based population in Shandong including 200 “extreme individuals” (Dis-Shandong) and a candidate gene-based study population including 596 individuals in Shanghai (Dis-Shanghai). The stage 2 validation study consisted of 480 cases and 469 controls from Shandong (Val-Shandong) and 694 cases and 979 controls from Hubie (Val-Hubei). Stage 3 replication studies of rs700926 and the nine tag SNPs of NPR-C included 5 independent cohorts: Rep-Shanghai, Rep-Shandong, Rep-Shaanxi, Rep-Hubei and Rep-Sichuan in China. The stage 3 replication study included 480 cases and 469 controls in Shandong (Rep-Shandong), 392 cases and 236 controls in Shaanxi (Rep-Shaanxi), 694 cases and 976 controls in Hubei (Rep-Hubei), 480 cases and 460 controls in Sichuan (Rep-Sichuan), 293 cases and 293 controls in Cohort 1 in Central China (Rep-Center 1) and 1024 cases and 711 controls in Cohort 2 of Cnetral China (Rep-Center 2). Rep-Shandong is the same as Val-Shandong, Rep-Hubei is the same as Val-Hubei, and Rep-Center 1 is the same as Dis-Shanghai.