John Bian1, Charles Bennett2, Gregory Cooper2, Alessandra D'Alfonso2, Deborah Fisher2, Joseph Lipscomb2, Chao-Nan Qian2. 1. South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC; University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Emory Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China jbian@sccp.sc.edu. 2. South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC; University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Emory Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There are concerns about potential overuse of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening services among average-risk individuals older than age 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a 5% random noncancer sample of Medicare beneficiaries who resided in the SEER areas, we examined rates of CRC screening adherence, defined by the Medicare coverage policy, among average-risk fee-for-service beneficiaries age 76 to 95 years from 2002 to 2010. The two outcomes are the status of overall CRC screening adherence, and the status of adherence to colonoscopy (v other modalities) conditional on patient adherence. RESULTS: Overall CRC screening adherence rates of Medicare beneficiaries age 76 to 95 years increased from 13.0% to 21.4% from 2002 to 2010. In 2002, 2.2% of beneficiaries were adherent to colonoscopy, and 10.7%, by other modalities; the corresponding rates were 19.5% and 1.9%, respectively, in 2010. Specifically, rates of adherence to colonoscopy were 1.1% for those age 86 to 90 years and almost nil for those age 91 to 95 years in 2002, but the rates became 13.5% and 8.2%, respectively, in 2010. Compared with white beneficiaries, black beneficiaries age 76 to 95 years had a 7-percentage-point lower adherence rate. However, overall adherence rates among blacks increased by 168.6% from 2002 to 2010, whereas rates among whites increased by 63.0%. Logistic regressions showed that blacks age 86 to 95 years were less likely than whites to be adherent (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.59) but were more likely to be adherent to colonoscopy (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.47 to 3.91). CONCLUSION: High proportions of average-risk Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries screened by colonoscopy may represent opportunities for improving appropriateness and allocative efficiency of CRC screening by Medicare.
INTRODUCTION: There are concerns about potential overuse of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening services among average-risk individuals older than age 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a 5% random noncancer sample of Medicare beneficiaries who resided in the SEER areas, we examined rates of CRC screening adherence, defined by the Medicare coverage policy, among average-risk fee-for-service beneficiaries age 76 to 95 years from 2002 to 2010. The two outcomes are the status of overall CRC screening adherence, and the status of adherence to colonoscopy (v other modalities) conditional on patient adherence. RESULTS: Overall CRC screening adherence rates of Medicare beneficiaries age 76 to 95 years increased from 13.0% to 21.4% from 2002 to 2010. In 2002, 2.2% of beneficiaries were adherent to colonoscopy, and 10.7%, by other modalities; the corresponding rates were 19.5% and 1.9%, respectively, in 2010. Specifically, rates of adherence to colonoscopy were 1.1% for those age 86 to 90 years and almost nil for those age 91 to 95 years in 2002, but the rates became 13.5% and 8.2%, respectively, in 2010. Compared with white beneficiaries, black beneficiaries age 76 to 95 years had a 7-percentage-point lower adherence rate. However, overall adherence rates among blacks increased by 168.6% from 2002 to 2010, whereas rates among whites increased by 63.0%. Logistic regressions showed that blacks age 86 to 95 years were less likely than whites to be adherent (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.59) but were more likely to be adherent to colonoscopy (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.47 to 3.91). CONCLUSION: High proportions of average-risk Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries screened by colonoscopy may represent opportunities for improving appropriateness and allocative efficiency of CRC screening by Medicare.
Authors: Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Uri Ladabaum; Jennifer Haas; Karla Kerlikowske; David Lieberman; Robert Hiatt; Mika Nagamine; Stephanie L Van Bebber Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Winnie Ricker; William Wheeler; Ruth Parsons; Joan L Warren Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Nancy C Dolan; M Rosario Ferreira; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Terry C Davis; Alfred W Rademaker; Dachao Liu; June Lee; Michael Wolf; Brian P Schmitt; Charles L Bennett Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-07-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Su-Ying Liang; Kathryn A Phillips; Mika Nagamine; Uri Ladabaum; Jennifer S Haas Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: John Bian; Brian Chen; Dawn L Hershman; Norman Marks; LeAnn Norris; Richard Schulz; Charles L Bennett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Folasade P May; Beth A Glenn; Catherine M Crespi; Ninez Ponce; Brennan M R Spiegel; Roshan Bastani Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: David B Preen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Hooi C Ee; Cameron Platell; Dayna R Cenin; Lakkhina Troeung; Max Bulsara; Peter O'Leary Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2017-09-08