Literature DB >> 33750307

Does self-reported symptom questionnaire play a role in nonadherence to colonoscopy for risk-increased population in the Tianjin colorectal cancer screening programme?

Lizhong Zhao1, Xiaorui Zhang2, Yongjie Chen2, Yuan Wang2, Weihua Zhang2, Wenli Lu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A colorectal cancer screening programme (CCSP) was implemented from 2012 to 2017 in Tianjin, China. Residents with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) or positive self-reported symptom questionnaire (SRSQ) were recommended to undergo colonoscopy. The objective was to investigate the potential factors associated with nonadherence to colonoscopy among a risk-increased population.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the CCSP database, and 199,522 residents with positive FIT or positive SRSQ during two screening rounds (2012-2017) were included in the analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between nonadherence to colonoscopy and potential predictors.
RESULTS: A total of 152,870 (76.6%) individuals did not undergo colonoscopy after positive FIT or positive SRSQ. Residents with positive SRSQ but without positive FIT were more likely not to undergo colonoscopy (negative FIT: OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.29-2.41, no FIT: OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.24-1.31). Patients without a cancer history were less likely to undergo colonoscopy even if they received risk-increased reports based on the SRSQ.
CONCLUSION: In the CCSP, seventy-seven percent of the risk-increased population did not undergo colonoscopy. FIT should be recommended since positive FIT results are related to improved adherence to colonoscopy. Residents with negative FIT but positive SRSQ should be informed of the potential cancer risk to ensure adherence to colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Early diagnosis; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33750307      PMCID: PMC7944887          DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01701-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1471-230X            Impact factor:   3.067


  32 in total

1.  Recommendations on prevention and screening for colorectal cancer in Hong Kong.

Authors:  T H Lam; K H Wong; K Kl Chan; M Cm Chan; D Vk Chao; A Ny Cheung; C Ym Fan; J Ho; E P Hui; K O Lam; C K Law; W L Law; H Hf Loong; R Kc Ngan; T Hf Tsang; M Cs Wong; R Mw Yeung; A Ch Ying; R Ching
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.227

2.  Factors associated with attendance to scheduled outpatient endoscopy.

Authors:  Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Carla D Williams; Clinton Burnside; Sepideh Moghadam; Kamla D Sanasi-Bhola; John Kwagyan; Hassan Brim; Hassan Ashktorab; Victor F Scott; Duane T Smoot
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Amy A Gravely; James F Burgess; David A Haggstrom; Sarah E Lillie; David B Nelson; Sean M Nugent; Aasma Shaukat; Shahnaz Sultan; Louise C Walter; Diana J Burgess
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Association of marital status and colorectal cancer screening participation in the USA.

Authors:  B El-Haddad; F Dong; K J Kallail; R B Hines; E Ablah
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  The influence of sociocultural factors on colonoscopy and FOBT screening adherence among low-income Hispanics.

Authors:  Rachel C Shelton; Lina Jandorf; Jennie Ellison; Cristina Villagra; Katherine N DuHamel
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-08

6.  Appointment-keeping behaviors and procedure day are associated with colonoscopy attendance in a patient navigator population.

Authors:  Jennifer Nayor; Swapnil Maniar; Walter W Chan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Trust, choice and obligation: a qualitative study of enablers of colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.

Authors:  Paul R Ward; Cushla Coffey; Samantha Meyer
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-04-25

9.  High uptake of colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in a healthcare region: a population-based, prospective study.

Authors:  F Armelao; P G Orlandi; E Tasini; G Franceschini; R Franch; C Paternolli; G de Pretis
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Lise M Helsingen; Per Olav Vandvik; Henriette C Jodal; Thomas Agoritsas; Lyubov Lytvyn; Joseph C Anderson; Reto Auer; Silje Bjerkelund Murphy; Majid Abdulrahman Almadi; Douglas A Corley; Casey Quinlan; Jonathan M Fuchs; Annette McKinnon; Amir Qaseem; Anja Fog Heen; Reed A C Siemieniuk; Mette Kalager; Juliet A Usher-Smith; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Michael Bretthauer; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-10-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  A risk-prediction score for colorectal lesions on 12,628 participants at high risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lixin Liang; Yingru Liang; Ke Li; Pengzhe Qin; Guozhen Lin; Yan Li; Huan Xu; Suixiang Wang; Qinlong Jing; Boheng Liang; Lin Xu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2022-02-09

2.  Modifiable lifestyle factors have a larger contribution to colorectal neoplasms than family history.

Authors:  Shuyuan Wang; Zhen Yuan; Yuqi Wang; Xuanzhu Zhao; Weifeng Gao; Hongzhou Li; Yuanshun Zhao; Zili Zhang; Shuiqing Liang; Zhaoce Liu; Qinghuai Zhang; Hong Ma; Xipeng Zhang; Wei Cui; Chunze Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.638

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.