Literature DB >> 17224779

Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.

Kathryn A Phillips1, Su-Ying Liang, Uri Ladabaum, Jennifer Haas, Karla Kerlikowske, David Lieberman, Robert Hiatt, Mika Nagamine, Stephanie L Van Bebber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A major health priority is to increase colorectal cancer screening, and colonoscopy has become an increasingly important method of screening. The Medicare program began coverage for colonoscopy for average risk individuals in 2001.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine whether overall colorectal cancer screening increased over time and whether these increases were a result of increased utilization of all methods or a result of greater use of colonoscopy but reduced use of other methods, whether the enactment of Medicare coverage was associated with an increase in colonoscopy among Medicare enrollees, and whether these trends equally affected subpopulations.
METHODS: We used nationally representative data from the 2000 and 2003 National Health Interview Surveys and analyzed data using used chi, difference-in-differences tests, and logistic regression analyses to examine whether screening rates differed between 2000 and 2003.
RESULTS: The percentage of individuals being screened for colorectal cancer using any method increased modestly from 2000 to 2003 (3%), with increases a result of increased use of colonoscopy and a reduction in the use of other methods. Increases in colonoscopy use were significant among all populations except the insured, non-Medicare population with low incomes. Among Medicare enrollees with high/middle incomes, colonoscopy use increased 14% from 2000 to 2003 compared with an increase of only 7% among low-income groups, which was a significant difference (P < 0.01). Similarly, among insured, non-Medicare enrollees with high/middle incomes, colonoscopy use increased 11% from 2000 to 2003 compared with an increase of only 4% among low-income groups, which also was a significant difference (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer screening utilization increased modestly from 2000 to 2003, with the increases that primarily were the result of increased colonoscopy use. Increases in colonoscopy use, however, were primarily among high/middle income groups. Although Medicare coverage may have indirectly facilitated the increase in colonoscopy, we could not determine that coverage directly increased screening rates. Screening rates remain modest and lower income individuals continue to be screened less. Topics for future research include approaches to facilitating screening among low-income individuals and evaluating the impact of policy coverage decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17224779     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000246612.35245.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  50 in total

1.  A population-based study of prevalence and adherence trends in average risk colorectal cancer screening, 1997 to 2008.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Ellen L Goode; Paul J Limburg; Sally W Vernon; Joseph B Wick; Christi A Patten; Paul A Decker; Andrew C Hanson; Christina M Smith; Timothy J Beebe; Frank A Sinicrope; Noralane M Lindor; Tabetha A Brockman; L Joseph Melton; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures.

Authors:  Henk Harkema; Wendy W Chapman; Melissa Saul; Evan S Dellon; Robert E Schoen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by primary care physicians with standby specialist support.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Thomas G Hurley; Lekhena Sros; James R Hebert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The first year follow-up after colorectal adenoma polypectomy is important: a multiple-center study in symptomatic hospital-based individuals in China.

Authors:  Qin-Yan Gao; Hui-Min Chen; Jian-Qiu Sheng; Ping Zheng; Cheng-Gong Yu; Bo Jiang; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2010-12-02

5.  Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Stephen Taplin; Gigi Yuan; David Ransohoff; Sarah Kobrin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Proximal and distal colorectal cancer resection rates in the United States since widespread screening by colonoscopy.

Authors:  Parvathi A Myer; Ajitha Mannalithara; Gurkirpal Singh; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Quality colonoscopy: a matter of time, technique or technology?

Authors:  Robert H Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Determinants of variations in self-reported barriers to colonoscopy among uninsured patients in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Chinedum Ojinnaka; Ann Vuong; Janet Helduser; Philip Nash; Marcia G Ory; David A McClellan; Jane N Bolin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-04

9.  Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ann C DeBourcy; Scott Lichtenberger; Susanne Felton; Kiel T Butterfield; Dennis J Ahnen; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Acculturation and colorectal cancer screening among older Latino adults: differential associations by national origin.

Authors:  Aimee Afable-Munsuz; Su-Ying Liang; Ninez A Ponce; Judith M E Walsh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.