RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the latest coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) techniques allowing a radiation- and contrast-sparing protocol on image quality in unselected patients referred for exclusion of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. Between March and June 2015, 89 consecutive patients (61% male; mean age 55 ± 11 years) referred for exclusion of CAD by 256-slice CCTA using prospective electrocardiogram triggering were included. Tube voltage (80-120 kVp), tube current (180-310 mA) as well contrast agent volume (25-45 mL) and flow rate (3.5-5 mL/s) were adapted to body mass index. Signal intensity was measured by placing a region of interest in the aortic root, the left main artery, and the proximal right coronary artery. Image noise was measured in the aortic root. Two independent blinded readers semi-quantitatively assessed the image quality regarding motion, noise, and contrast on a 4-point scale. RESULTS: Median contrast agent volume and median effective radiation dose were 35 mL (interquartile range, 30-40 mL) and 0.5 mSv (interquartile range, 0.4-0.6 mSv), respectively. Mean attenuation in the aortic root was 412 ± 89 Hounsfield units. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 1050 of 1067 (98.4%) coronary segments and, on an intention-to-diagnosis basis, in 85 of 89 (95.5%) patients. Below a cut-off heart rate of 67 beats/min, only 1 of 974 (0.1%) coronary segments was nondiagnostic. CONCLUSION: A radiation- and contrast-sparing protocol for CCTA on a latest generation 256-slice computed tomography scanner yields diagnostic image quality in patients referred for CAD exclusion in daily clinical routine.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the latest coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) techniques allowing a radiation- and contrast-sparing protocol on image quality in unselected patients referred for exclusion of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. Between March and June 2015, 89 consecutive patients (61% male; mean age 55 ± 11 years) referred for exclusion of CAD by 256-slice CCTA using prospective electrocardiogram triggering were included. Tube voltage (80-120 kVp), tube current (180-310 mA) as well contrast agent volume (25-45 mL) and flow rate (3.5-5 mL/s) were adapted to body mass index. Signal intensity was measured by placing a region of interest in the aortic root, the left main artery, and the proximal right coronary artery. Image noise was measured in the aortic root. Two independent blinded readers semi-quantitatively assessed the image quality regarding motion, noise, and contrast on a 4-point scale. RESULTS: Median contrast agent volume and median effective radiation dose were 35 mL (interquartile range, 30-40 mL) and 0.5 mSv (interquartile range, 0.4-0.6 mSv), respectively. Mean attenuation in the aortic root was 412 ± 89 Hounsfield units. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 1050 of 1067 (98.4%) coronary segments and, on an intention-to-diagnosis basis, in 85 of 89 (95.5%) patients. Below a cut-off heart rate of 67 beats/min, only 1 of 974 (0.1%) coronary segments was nondiagnostic. CONCLUSION: A radiation- and contrast-sparing protocol for CCTA on a latest generation 256-slice computed tomography scanner yields diagnostic image quality in patients referred for CAD exclusion in daily clinical routine.
Authors: Dominik C Benz; Christoph Gräni; Beatrice Hirt Moch; Fran Mikulicic; Jan Vontobel; Tobias A Fuchs; Julia Stehli; Olivier F Clerc; Mathias Possner; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Oliver Gaemperli; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Dominik C Benz; Christoph Gräni; Paola Ferro; Luis Neumeier; Michael Messerli; Mathias Possner; Olivier F Clerc; Catherine Gebhard; Oliver Gaemperli; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Lakshmi Ananthakrishnan; Fernando U Kay; Eric A Zeikus; Eugene S Chu; Joseph Chang; John D Barr; Neil M Rofsky; Suhny Abbara Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2022-05-25
Authors: Georgios Benetos; Ronny R Buechel; Marisa Gonçalves; Dominik C Benz; Elia von Felten; Georgios P Rampidis; Olivier F Clerc; Michael Messerli; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Cathérine Gebhard; Tobias A Fuchs; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann; Christoph Gräni Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Dominik C Benz; Fran Mikulicic; Christoph Gräni; Marvin Grossmann; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Michael Messerli; Catherine Gebhard; Oliver Gaemperli; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann; Aju P Pazhenkottil Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2017-11-25 Impact factor: 3.138