Joel E Kostka1, David J Weston2, Jennifer B Glass1, Erik A Lilleskov3, A Jonathan Shaw4, Merritt R Turetsky5. 1. Schools of Biology and Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA. 2. Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA. 3. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA. 4. Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. 5. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Abstract
57 I. 57 II. 58 III. 59 IV. 59 V. 61 VI. 62 63 References 63 SUMMARY: Peat mosses of the genus Sphagnum play a major role in global carbon storage and dominate many northern peatland ecosystems, which are currently being subjected to some of the most rapid climate changes on Earth. A rapidly expanding database indicates that a diverse community of microorganisms is intimately associated with Sphagnum, inhabiting the tissues and surface of the plant. Here we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the Sphagnum microbiome and provide a perspective for future research directions. Although the majority of the microbiome remains uncultivated and its metabolic capabilities uncharacterized, prokaryotes and fungi have the potential to act as mutualists, symbionts, or antagonists of Sphagnum. For example, methanotrophic and nitrogen-fixing bacteria may benefit the plant host by providing up to 20-30% of Sphagnum carbon and nitrogen, respectively. Next-generation sequencing approaches have enabled the detailed characterization of microbiome community composition in peat mosses. However, as with other ecologically or economically important plants, our knowledge of Sphagnum-microbiome associations is in its infancy. In order to attain a predictive understanding of the role of the microbiome in Sphagnum productivity and ecosystem function, the mechanisms of plant-microbiome interactions and the metabolic potential of constituent microbial populations must be revealed.
57 I. 57 II. 58 III. 59 IV. 59 V. 61 VI. 62 63 References 63 SUMMARY: Peat mosses of the genus Sphagnum play a major role in global carbon storage and dominate many northern peatland ecosystems, which are currently being subjected to some of the most rapid climate changes on Earth. A rapidly expanding database indicates that a diverse community of microorganisms is intimately associated with Sphagnum, inhabiting the tissues and surface of the plant. Here we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the Sphagnum microbiome and provide a perspective for future research directions. Although the majority of the microbiome remains uncultivated and its metabolic capabilities uncharacterized, prokaryotes and fungi have the potential to act as mutualists, symbionts, or antagonists of Sphagnum. For example, methanotrophic and nitrogen-fixing bacteria may benefit the plant host by providing up to 20-30% of Sphagnum carbon and nitrogen, respectively. Next-generation sequencing approaches have enabled the detailed characterization of microbiome community composition in peat mosses. However, as with other ecologically or economically important plants, our knowledge of Sphagnum-microbiome associations is in its infancy. In order to attain a predictive understanding of the role of the microbiome in Sphagnum productivity and ecosystem function, the mechanisms of plant-microbiome interactions and the metabolic potential of constituent microbial populations must be revealed.
Authors: Max Reumer; Monika Harnisz; Hyo Jung Lee; Andreas Reim; Oliver Grunert; Anuliina Putkinen; Hannu Fritze; Paul L E Bodelier; Adrian Ho Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Thomas Kaupper; Lucas W Mendes; Monica Harnisz; Sascha M B Krause; Marcus A Horn; Adrian Ho Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Joshua M A Stough; Max Kolton; Joel E Kostka; David J Weston; Dale A Pelletier; Steven W Wilhelm Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Melissa J Warren; Xueju Lin; John C Gaby; Cecilia B Kretz; Max Kolton; Peter L Morton; Jennifer Pett-Ridge; David J Weston; Christopher W Schadt; Joel E Kostka; Jennifer B Glass Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Martine A R Kox; Sanni L Aalto; Timo Penttilä; Katharina F Ettwig; Mike S M Jetten; Maartje A H J van Kessel Journal: AMB Express Date: 2018-05-05 Impact factor: 3.298
Authors: Monika K Reczuga; Mariusz Lamentowicz; Matthieu Mulot; Edward A D Mitchell; Alexandre Buttler; Bogdan Chojnicki; Michał Słowiński; Philippe Binet; Geneviève Chiapusio; Daniel Gilbert; Sandra Słowińska; Vincent E J Jassey Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2018-05-12 Impact factor: 2.912