Literature DB >> 29180368

Impact of Peat Mining and Restoration on Methane Turnover Potential and Methane-Cycling Microorganisms in a Northern Bog.

Max Reumer1, Monika Harnisz2, Hyo Jung Lee1,3, Andreas Reim4, Oliver Grunert5, Anuliina Putkinen6, Hannu Fritze6, Paul L E Bodelier1, Adrian Ho7.   

Abstract

Ombrotrophic peatlands are a recognized global carbon reservoir. Without restoration and peat regrowth, harvested peatlands are dramatically altered, impairing their carbon sink function, with consequences for methane turnover. Previous studies determined the impact of commercial mining on the physicochemical properties of peat and the effects on methane turnover. However, the response of the underlying microbial communities catalyzing methane production and oxidation have so far received little attention. We hypothesize that with the return of Sphagnum spp. postharvest, methane turnover potential and the corresponding microbial communities will converge in a natural and restored peatland. To address our hypothesis, we determined the potential methane production and oxidation rates in natural (as a reference), actively mined, abandoned, and restored peatlands over two consecutive years. In all sites, the methanogenic and methanotrophic population sizes were enumerated using quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays targeting the mcrA and pmoA genes, respectively. Shifts in the community composition were determined using Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the mcrA gene and a pmoA-based terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (t-RFLP) analysis, complemented by cloning and sequence analysis of the mmoX gene. Peat mining adversely affected methane turnover potential, but the rates recovered in the restored site. The recovery in potential activity was reflected in the methanogenic and methanotrophic abundances. However, the microbial community composition was altered, being more pronounced for the methanotrophs. Overall, we observed a lag between the recovery of the methanogenic/methanotrophic activity and the return of the corresponding microbial communities, suggesting that a longer duration (>15 years) is needed to reverse mining-induced effects on the methane-cycling microbial communities.IMPORTANCE Ombrotrophic peatlands are a crucial carbon sink, but this environment is also a source of methane, an important greenhouse gas. Methane emission in peatlands is regulated by methane production and oxidation catalyzed by methanogens and methanotrophs, respectively. Methane-cycling microbial communities have been documented in natural peatlands. However, less is known of their response to peat mining and of the recovery of the community after restoration. Mining exerts an adverse impact on potential methane production and oxidation rates and on methanogenic and methanotrophic population abundances. Peat mining also induced a shift in the methane-cycling microbial community composition. Nevertheless, with the return of Sphagnum spp. in the restored site after 15 years, methanogenic and methanotrophic activity and population abundance recovered well. The recovery, however, was not fully reflected in the community composition, suggesting that >15 years are needed to reverse mining-induced effects.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sphagnum; land use change; methane oxidation; methanogenesis; nifH; nitrogen fixation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29180368      PMCID: PMC5772240          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02218-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  40 in total

1.  Revealing the uncultivated majority: combining DNA stable-isotope probing, multiple displacement amplification and metagenomic analyses of uncultivated Methylocystis in acidic peatlands.

Authors:  Yin Chen; Marc G Dumont; Josh D Neufeld; Levente Bodrossy; Nancy Stralis-Pavese; Niall P McNamara; Nick Ostle; Maria J I Briones; J Colin Murrell
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.491

2.  Quantitative PCR of pmoA using a novel reverse primer correlates with potential methane oxidation in Finnish fen.

Authors:  Tero T Tuomivirta; Kim Yrjälä; Hannu Fritze
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.992

3.  Methane dynamics regulated by microbial community response to permafrost thaw.

Authors:  Carmody K McCalley; Ben J Woodcroft; Suzanne B Hodgkins; Richard A Wehr; Eun-Hae Kim; Rhiannon Mondav; Patrick M Crill; Jeffrey P Chanton; Virginia I Rich; Gene W Tyson; Scott R Saleska
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Conversion of Amazon rainforest to agriculture alters community traits of methane-cycling organisms.

Authors:  Kyle M Meyer; Ann M Klein; Jorge L M Rodrigues; Klaus Nüsslein; Susannah G Tringe; Babur S Mirza; James M Tiedje; Brendan J M Bohannan
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  Methanosaeta, the forgotten methanogen?

Authors:  Kerry S Smith; Cheryl Ingram-Smith
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved.

Authors:  Ralf Conrad
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.541

7.  Ageing well: methane oxidation and methane oxidizing bacteria along a chronosequence of 2000 years.

Authors:  Adrian Ho; Claudia Lüke; Zhihong Cao; Peter Frenzel
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.541

8.  Microbial Abundances Predict Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from a Windrow Composting System.

Authors:  Shuqing Li; Lina Song; Xiang Gao; Yaguo Jin; Shuwei Liu; Qirong Shen; Jianwen Zou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Controls on bacterial and archaeal community structure and greenhouse gas production in natural, mined, and restored Canadian peatlands.

Authors:  Nathan Basiliko; Kevin Henry; Varun Gupta; Tim R Moore; Brian T Driscoll; Peter F Dunfield
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  Biotic Interactions in Microbial Communities as Modulators of Biogeochemical Processes: Methanotrophy as a Model System.

Authors:  Adrian Ho; Roey Angel; Annelies J Veraart; Anne Daebeler; Zhongjun Jia; Sang Yoon Kim; Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof; Nico Boon; Paul L E Bodelier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Recovery in methanotrophic activity does not reflect on the methane-driven interaction network after peat mining.

Authors:  Thomas Kaupper; Lucas W Mendes; Monica Harnisz; Sascha M B Krause; Marcus A Horn; Adrian Ho
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Amsterdam urban canals contain novel niches for methane-cycling microorganisms.

Authors:  Koen A J Pelsma; Michiel H In 't Zandt; Huub J M Op den Camp; Mike S M Jetten; Joshua F Dean; Cornelia U Welte
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.476

3.  Methanotrophs Contribute to Nitrogen Fixation in Emergent Macrophytes.

Authors:  Jing Cui; Meng Zhang; Linxia Chen; Shaohua Zhang; Ying Luo; Weiwei Cao; Ji Zhao; Lixin Wang; Zhongjun Jia; Zhihua Bao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 4.  Impact of Anthropogenic Activities on the Dissemination of ARGs in the Environment-A Review.

Authors:  Małgorzata Czatzkowska; Izabela Wolak; Monika Harnisz; Ewa Korzeniewska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 5.  The Response of Microbial Communities to Peatland Drainage and Rewetting. A Review.

Authors:  Ezra Kitson; Nicholle G A Bell
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.