| Literature DB >> 29938090 |
Monika K Reczuga1,2,3, Mariusz Lamentowicz1,2, Matthieu Mulot4, Edward A D Mitchell4,5, Alexandre Buttler1,6,7,8, Bogdan Chojnicki9, Michał Słowiński10, Philippe Binet8, Geneviève Chiapusio8,11, Daniel Gilbert8, Sandra Słowińska12, Vincent E J Jassey6,7,13.
Abstract
Mid- to high-latitude peatlands are a major terrestrial carbon stock but become carbon sources during droughts, which are increasingly frequent as a result of climate warming. A critical question within this context is the sensitivity to drought of peatland microbial food webs. Microbiota drive key ecological and biogeochemical processes, but their response to drought is likely to impact these processes. Peatland food webs have, however, been little studied, especially the response of microbial predators. We studied the response of microbial predators (testate amoebae, ciliates, rotifers, and nematodes) living in Sphagnum moss carpet to droughts, and their influence on lower trophic levels and on related microbial enzyme activity. We assessed the impact of reduced water availability on microbial predators in two peatlands using experimental (Linje mire, Poland) and natural (Forbonnet mire, France) water level gradients, reflecting a sudden change in moisture regime (Linje), and a typically drier environment (Forbonnet). The sensitivity of different microbial groups to drought was size dependent; large sized microbiota such as testate amoebae declined most under dry conditions (-41% in Forbonnet and -80% in Linje). These shifts caused a decrease in the predator-prey mass ratio (PPMR). We related microbial enzymatic activity to PPMR; we found that a decrease in PPMR can have divergent effects on microbial enzymatic activity. In a community adapted to drier conditions, decreasing PPMR stimulated microbial enzyme activity, while in extreme drought experiment, it reduced microbial activity. These results suggest that microbial enzymatic activity resulting from food web structure is optimal only within a certain range of PPMR, and that different trophic mechanisms are involved in the response of peatlands to droughts. Our findings confirm the importance of large microbial consumers living at the surface of peatlands on the functioning of peatlands, and illustrate their value as early warning indicators of change.Entities:
Keywords: Wetlands; body size; drought; food web; phenoloxidase; poor fen; protists; soil moisture; water table manipulation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29938090 PMCID: PMC6010735 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Moisture content differences between plots in Forbonnet and Linje. Sphagnum moisture content (%) was expressed as the difference between the fresh (FM) and the dry mass (DM) relative to the fresh mass: (FW−DW)/FW
| Segment | Site | Hydrology | Mean | Median | Max | Min |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper | Forbonnet | MW | 85.08 | 85.45 | 91.60 | 78.00 | 2.45 |
| MD | 77.28 | 77.05 | 93.10 | 59.60 | 5.61 | ||
| Linje | W | 92.13 | 89.90 | 96.60 | 89.90 | 1.41 | |
| NAT | 63.57 | 62.00 | 71.40 | 62.00 | 1.57 | ||
| ED | 10.60 | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Lower | Forbonnet | MW | 89.35 | 90.60 | 92.10 | 81.80 | 1.54 |
| MD | 89.97 | 90.50 | 92.00 | 87.70 | 0.72 | ||
| Linje | W | 91.10 | 91.10 | 91.10 | 91.10 | 0.00 | |
| NAT | 83.90 | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| ED | 68.10 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Figure 1Redundancy analyses (RDA) of microbial communities (log‐transformed) in the observational study (Forbonnet) (a) and the extreme drought experiment (Linje) (b). Moist, Sphagnum moisture (%); MW, moderately wet plots (Forbonnet); MD, moderately dry (MD) (Forbonnet); W, wet (Linje); NAT, natural condition (Linje); ED, extreme drought (Linje); A, upper Sphagnum segments; B, lower Sphagnum segments. Ellipses represent standard errors of the (weighted) average of site scores around the centroid of each microhabitat or treatment × segments levels. In the brackets variation explained by each canonical axis is indicated and asterisks (*) indicate significance of the RDA axis
Figure 2Biomass of microbial groups in the observational study and the experiment expressed in mg C/m2. MW, moderately wet plots; MD, moderately dry; W, wet (Linje); NAT, natural condition (Linje); ED, extreme drought (Linje). Letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < .05, Tukey's test on ln(y + 1) transformed biomass data). Bars indicate standard errors
Figure 3Linear regressions of the biomass of individual microbial groups to Sphagnum moisture conditions for the pooled data sets of Forbonnet and Linje peatlands
Figure 4Relation between the response of each microbial group to shifts in Sphagnum moisture conditions (z scores) and their mean community size (mean community biovolume). IndVal scores were calculated using TITAN method (Baker & King, 2010) for each microbial group along the Sphagnum moisture gradient. Then, permuted IndVal scores were standardized as z scores. R, rotifers, N, nematodes
Figure 5Response of phenoloxidase activity (a, b) and predator‐to‐prey mass ratio (PPMR) (d, e) to moisture in upper and lower Sphagnum segments in the two peatlands. MW, moderately wet plots; MD, moderately dry; W, wet (Linje); NAT, natural condition (Linje); ED, extreme drought (Linje). (c) Relationship between PPMR and Sphagnum moisture content (e) Relationship between PPMR and phenoloxidase activity (log‐transformed). Both upper and lower Sphagnum segments were combined. Triangles represent the drought experiment (Linje peatland) while circles the observational study (Forbonnet peatland). The red line in (f) represents the relationship between PPMR and phenoloxidases when both sites are combined