| Literature DB >> 27167126 |
Evelien Gerits1, Eline Blommaert1, Anna Lippell2, Alex J O'Neill2, Bram Weytjens3, Dries De Maeyer3, Ana Carolina Fierro1,3, Kathleen Marchal3,4, Arnaud Marchand5, Patrick Chaltin5,6, Pieter Spincemaille7, Katrijn De Brucker1, Karin Thevissen1, Bruno P A Cammue1,8, Toon Swings1, Veerle Liebens1, Maarten Fauvart1,9, Natalie Verstraeten1, Jan Michiels1.
Abstract
Nosocomial and community-acquired infections caused by multidrug resistant bacteria represent a major human health problem. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of antibiotics with new modes of action. In this study, we investigated the antibacterial characteristics and mode of action of a new antimicrobial compound, SPI031 (N-alkylated 3, 6-dihalogenocarbazol 1-(sec-butylamino)-3-(3,6-dichloro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)propan-2-ol), which was previously identified in our group. This compound exhibits broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, including activity against the human pathogens Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We found that SPI031 has rapid bactericidal activity (7-log reduction within 30 min at 4x MIC) and that the frequency of resistance development against SPI031 is low. To elucidate the mode of action of SPI031, we performed a macromolecular synthesis assay, which showed that SPI031 causes non-specific inhibition of macromolecular biosynthesis pathways. Liposome leakage and membrane permeability studies revealed that SPI031 rapidly exerts membrane damage, which is likely the primary cause of its antibacterial activity. These findings were supported by a mutational analysis of SPI031-resistant mutants, a transcriptome analysis and the identification of transposon mutants with altered sensitivity to the compound. In conclusion, our results show that SPI031 exerts its antimicrobial activity by causing membrane damage, making it an interesting starting point for the development of new antibacterial therapies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27167126 PMCID: PMC4864301 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Structure of compound SPI031.
Fig 2Time-kill kinetics of SPI031 against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.
(A) Concentration-dependent killing of S. aureus by SPI031 and vancomycin (VAN). (B) Concentration-dependent killing of P. aeruginosa by SPI031 and polymyxin B (PMB). All data represent means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from 3 independent experiments (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). The black dotted lines indicate the lower limit of detection.
Fig 3Effect of SPI031 on macromolecular synthesis in S. aureus.
Incorporation of [methyl-3H]thymidine (A), [5,6-3H]uridine (B) and L-[G-3H]glutamine (C) by S. aureus after treatment with SPI031, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin or tetracycline at 4x MIC. Incorporation was expressed as percentage of untreated control. Values shown are means ± SD of triplicate determinations.
Fig 4Effect of SPI031 on membrane permeability.
(A) Effect of increasing concentrations of SPI031 on the membrane permeability of S. aureus, monitored by the uptake of SYTOX green. Cells treated with melittin (MEL) (1x MIC) served as a positive control. (B) Inner membrane permeabilization of P. aeruginosa after treatment with different concentrations of SPI031, determined by measuring SYTOX green uptake. Melittin (MEL) (1x MIC) was used as a positive control. (C) Outer membrane permeabilization of P. aeruginosa after treatment with different concentrations of SPI031, assessed by quantifying NPN uptake. Cells treated with polymyxin B (PMB) (1x MIC) were used as a positive control. Data represent the means of three independent replicates ± SEM (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared to untreated control).
Fig 5Integrity of S. aureus liposomes after treatment with SPI031 at 1x MIC and 4x MIC.
SDS (5%) and tetracycline (TET) (4x MIC) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Means and standard deviation (SD) of 3 independent experiments are shown (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared to treatment with tetracycline).
Fig 6Microscopic analysis of the cell membrane after treatment with SPI031.
Fluorescent images of S. aureus cells (upper row) and P. aeruginosa cells (lower row) stained with FM 4–64 in the absence or presence of 1x MIC of SPI031. Scale bar corresponds to 2 μm. Images were processed with unsharp mask of Zen 2.0.
Fig 7Network analysis of differential expression data.
Resulting subnetwork from network analysis of RNAseq data using PheNetic [27]. This subnetwork shows molecular mechanisms which are differentially active when comparing P. aeruginosa cells treated with 0.2x MIC of SPI031 to P. aeruginosa cells treated with DMSO. Nodes and connecting lines represent genes and interactions between these genes, respectively. Red dots represent genes overexpressed in the SPI031-treated organisms with respect to the DMSO-treated organism and vice versa for green dots. The color of the connecting lines represents the type of interaction in between genes. Yellow lines represent metabolic interactions, red lines represent regulatory interactions and green lines represent protein-protein interactions.