Literature DB >> 15561842

Impact of high-inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the activities of nafcillin, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with gentamicin, in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Kerry L LaPlante1, Michael J Rybak.   

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of high (9.5 log10 CFU/g) and moderate (5.5 log10 CFU/g) inocula of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA, respectively) on the activities of nafcillin, linezolid, vancomycin, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with gentamicin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations over 72 h. Human therapeutic dosing regimens for nafcillin, daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, and gentamicin were simulated. At a moderate inoculum, nafcillin (MSSA only), vancomycin, and daptomycin demonstrated equivalent and significant (P < 0.01) bactericidal (99.9% kill) activities (decreases of 3.34 +/- 1.1, 3.28 +/- 0.4, and 3.34 +/- 0.8 log10 CFU/g, respectively). Bactericidal activity was demonstrated at 4 h for nafcillin and daptomycin and at 32 h for vancomycin. Linezolid demonstrated bacteriostatic activity over the course of the study period. At a high inoculum, daptomycin exhibited bactericidal activity against both MSSA and MRSA by 24 h (decrease of 5.51 to 6.31 +/- 0.10 log10 CFU/g). Nafcillin (versus MSSA), vancomycin, and linezolid (MSSA and MRSA) did not achieve bactericidal activity throughout the 72-h experiment. The addition of gentamicin increased the rate of 99.9% kill to 8 h for daptomycin (P < 0.01) and 48 h for nafcillin (MSSA only) (P = 0.01). The addition of gentamicin did not improve the activity of vancomycin or linezolid for either isolate for the 72-h period. Overall, high-inoculum Staphylococcus aureus had a significant impact on the activities of nafcillin and vancomycin. In contrast, daptomycin was affected minimally and linezolid was not affected by inoculum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15561842      PMCID: PMC529225          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4665-4672.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  56 in total

Review 1.  Infective endocarditis in adults.

Authors:  E Mylonakis; S B Calderwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Activity of daptomycin against Gram-positive pathogens: a comparison with other agents and the determination of a tentative breakpoint.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews; J P Ashby
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  In vitro activities of daptomycin against 2,789 clinical isolates from 11 North American medical centers.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs; S D Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of linezolid following multiple oral doses.

Authors:  T Gee; R Ellis; G Marshall; J Andrews; J Ashby; R Wise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Retrospective evaluation of therapies for Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

Authors:  C A Gentry; K A Rodvold; R M Novak; R C Hershow; O J Naderer
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.705

6.  Bactericidal activities of two daptomycin regimens against clinical strains of glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  R L Akins; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of a rabbit model of bacterial endocarditis and an in vitro infection model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  E Hershberger; E A Coyle; G W Kaatz; M J Zervos; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Changing patient characteristics and the effect on mortality in endocarditis.

Authors:  Christopher H Cabell; James G Jollis; Gail E Peterson; G Ralph Corey; Deverick J Anderson; Daniel J Sexton; Christopher W Woods; L Barth Reller; Thomas Ryan; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-14

9.  Efficacy of linezolid in treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C F Dailey; C L Dileto-Fang; L V Buchanan; M P Oramas-Shirey; D H Batts; C W Ford; J K Gibson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacodynamics of daptomycin in a murine thigh model of Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  A Louie; P Kaw; W Liu; N Jumbe; M H Miller; G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  104 in total

1.  Novel daptomycin combinations against daptomycin-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Molly E Steed; Celine Vidaillac; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Daptomycin Dose-Ranging Evaluation with Single-Dose versus Multidose Ceftriaxone Combinations against Streptococcus mitis/oralis in an Ex Vivo Simulated Endocarditis Vegetation Model.

Authors:  Razieh Kebriaei; Seth A Rice; Kyle C Stamper; Ravin Seepersaud; Cristina Garcia-de-la-Maria; Nagendra N Mishra; Jose M Miro; Cesar A Arias; Truc T Tran; Paul M Sullam; Arnold S Bayer; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The Mechanism of Action of Lysobactin.

Authors:  Wonsik Lee; Kaitlin Schaefer; Yuan Qiao; Veerasak Srisuknimit; Heinrich Steinmetz; Rolf Müller; Daniel Kahne; Suzanne Walker
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and cefazolin alone and in combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mao Hagihara; Dora E Wiskirchen; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Antimicrobial agents for treatment of serious infections caused by resistant Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci.

Authors:  G M Eliopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Short-course gentamicin in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Brian T Tsuji; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Activity of daptomycin alone and in combination with rifampin and gentamicin against Staphylococcus aureus assessed by time-kill methodology.

Authors:  Kim Credito; Gengrong Lin; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Agents for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Gram-positive Endocarditis.

Authors:  Jennifer K Long
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline and daptomycin against MRSA, hVISA, and VISA with and without prior vancomycin exposure.

Authors:  Amira A Bhalodi; Mao Hagihara; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Treatment strategies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in pediatrics.

Authors:  Jason G Newland; Gregory L Kearns
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.