Literature DB >> 22299761

A randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of lateral branch neurotomy for chronic sacroiliac joint pain.

Nilesh Patel1, Andrew Gross, Lora Brown, Gennady Gekht.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of lateral branch neurotomy using cooled radiofrequency to a sham intervention for sacroiliac joint pain.
DESIGN: Fifty-one subjects were randomized on a 2:1 basis to lateral branch neurotomy and sham groups, respectively. Follow-ups were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. Subjects and coordinators were blinded to randomization until 3 months. Sham subjects were allowed to crossover to lateral branch neurotomy after 3 months.
SUBJECTS: Subjects 18-88 years of age had chronic (>6 months) axial back pain and positive response to dual lateral branch blocks.
INTERVENTIONS: Lateral branch neurotomy involved the use of cooled radiofrequency electrodes to ablate the S1-S3 lateral branches and the L5 dorsal ramus. The sham procedure was identical to the active treatment, except that radiofrequency energy was not delivered. OUTCOME MEASURES: The principal outcome measures were pain (numerical rating scale, SF-36BP), physical function (SF-36PF), disability (Oswestry disability index), quality of life (assessment of quality of life), and treatment success.
RESULTS: Statistically significant changes in pain, physical function, disability, and quality of life were found at 3-month follow-up, with all changes favoring the lateral branch neurotomy group. At 3-month follow-up, 47% of treated patients and 12% of sham subjects achieved treatment success. At 6 and 9 months, respectively, 38% and 59% of treated subjects achieved treatment success.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment group showed significant improvements in pain, disability, physical function, and quality of life as compared with the sham group. The duration and magnitude of relief was consistent with previous studies, with current results showing benefits extending beyond 9 months. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22299761     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01328.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  62 in total

1.  Does Level of Response to SI Joint Block Predict Response to SI Joint Fusion?

Authors:  David Polly; Daniel Cher; Peter G Whang; Clay Frank; Jonathan Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-01-21

2.  Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Bradley S Duhon; Fabien Bitan; Harry Lockstadt; Don Kovalsky; Daniel Cher; Travis Hillen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-20

Review 3.  [Interdisciplinary position paper: the value of radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of chronic pain].

Authors:  Rudolf Likar; Johann Auer; Albert Chavanne; Wilfried Ilias; Michael Kern; Petra Krepler; Hans-Georg Kress; Ulrike Lischnig; Gernot Maurer; Oliver Sommer; Martin C Spendel; Siegfried Thurnher; Karl Wohak; Andreas Wolf; Michael Wölkhart
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

5.  Surgical Revision after Sacroiliac Joint Fixation or Fusion.

Authors:  Katie Spain; Timothy Holt
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-19

Review 6.  The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications.

Authors:  A Vleeming; M D Schuenke; A T Masi; J E Carreiro; L Danneels; F H Willard
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 8.  Utilization of Facet Joint and Sacroiliac Joint Interventions in Medicare Population from 2000 to 2014: Explosive Growth Continues!

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Joshua A Hirsch; Vidyasagar Pampati; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-10

Review 9.  Comprehensive anatomical and immunohistochemical review of the innervation of the human spine and joints with application to an improved understanding of back pain.

Authors:  Pamela Youssef; Marios Loukas; Jens R Chapman; Rod J Oskouian; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  David W Polly; John Swofford; Peter G Whang; Clay J Frank; John A Glaser; Robert P Limoni; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.