Literature DB >> 30564865

Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.

Nikolai G Rainov1, Reinhard Schneiderhan2, Volkmar Heidecke3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is an underdiagnosed condition. Several published cohorts have reported favorable midterm outcomes after SIJ fusion using titanium implants placed across the SIJ. Herein, we report 12-month follow-up from SIJ fusion in a standard clinic setting.
METHODS: A carefully selected group of 160 consecutive patients with painful SIJ dysfunction were diagnosed at a single center and underwent unilateral or staged bilateral SIJ fusion using triangular titanium implants. Patients were routinely seen in clinic for follow-up every 3 months where they completed visual analog scale (0-10 range) pain ratings and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Follow-up CT scan was performed at 1 year.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 58 years, and 68% were women. 30% underwent staged bilateral SIJ fusion. By month 12, SIJ pain decreased from 8.0 to 2.5 (p < 0.0001) and disability (ODI) decreased from 45.3 to 16.4 (p < 0.0001). The proportion with clinically significant improvements in SIJ pain and ODI was high (> 95%). Perioperative adverse events were mild and decreased with increasing surgical experience with the procedure. Subgroup analysis showed slightly smaller improvements in those undergoing bilateral surgery and those with a spinal cord stimulator in place. CT scan at 1 year showed reabsorption along one or more implants in 16% of cases, but there were no breakages or implant removals.
CONCLUSIONS: In standard clinical practice, SIJ fusion with triangular titanium implants produces significant improvement in pain and disability related to SIJ dysfunction. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degenerative sacroiliitis; Minimally invasive surgery; Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis; Sacroiliac joint disruptions; Sacroiliac joint dysfunction; Spine surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30564865     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5860-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Jacob M Buchowski; Khaled M Kebaish; Vladimir Sinkov; David B Cohen; Ann N Sieber; John P Kostuik
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Age, body mass index, and gender differences in sacroiliac joint pathology.

Authors:  Robert W Irwin; Todd Watson; Ryan P Minick; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  Etiology of chronic low back pain in patients having undergone lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Michael J DePalma; Jessica M Ketchum; Thomas R Saullo
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 5.  Diagnostic validity of criteria for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karolina M Szadek; Peter van der Wurff; Maurits W van Tulder; Wouter W Zuurmond; Roberto S G M Perez
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  How often is low back pain not coming from the back?

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; David W Polly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Quality of life in preoperative patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction is at least as depressed as in other lumbar spinal conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Joseph Cher; W Carlton Reckling
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-09-16

8.  Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Arnold Graham Smith; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher; Leonard Rudolf; Donald Sachs; Mukund Gundanna; Jeffrey Kleiner; Milan G Mody; A Nick Shamie
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2013-10-30

9.  MIS Fusion of the SI Joint: Does Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion Affect Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  Leonard Rudolf
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-05-17

10.  Sacroiliac joint pain: burden of disease.

Authors:  Daniel Cher; David Polly; Sigurd Berven
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-04-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 2.  [Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ)].

Authors:  Adnan Kasapovic; Thaer Ali; Max Jaenisch; Yorck Rommelspacher; Martin Gathen; Robert Pflugmacher; Desireé Schwetje
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Three-Year Clinical Outcomes after Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis Using Triangular Implants in Japan: A Pilot Study of Five Cases.

Authors:  Daisuke Kurosawa; Eiichi Murakami; Hiroaki Koga; Hiroshi Ozawa
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-11

4.  Surgical Outcomes of Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Pain: An Analysis of Patients with Poor Results Regarding Activities of Daily Living.

Authors:  Daisuke Kurosawa; Eiichi Murakami; Toshimi Aizawa; Takashi Watanabe
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.