Literature DB >> 36048316

A Review of CT-Based Fracture Risk Assessment with Finite Element Modeling and Machine Learning.

Ingmar Fleps1, Elise F Morgan2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We reviewed advances over the past 3 years in assessment of fracture risk based on CT scans, considering methods that use finite element models, machine learning, or a combination of both. RECENT
FINDINGS: Several studies have demonstrated that CT-based assessment of fracture risk, using finite element modeling or biomarkers derived from machine learning, is equivalent to currently used clinical tools. Phantomless calibration of CT scans for bone mineral density enables accurate measurements from routinely taken scans. This opportunistic use of CT scans for fracture risk assessment is facilitated by high-quality automated segmentation with deep learning, enabling workflows that do not require user intervention. Modeling of more realistic and diverse loading conditions, as well as improved modeling of fracture mechanisms, has shown promise to enhance our understanding of fracture processes and improve the assessment of fracture risk beyond the performance of current clinical tools. CT-based screening for fracture risk is effective and, by analyzing scans that were taken for other indications, could be used to expand the pool of people screened, therefore improving fracture prevention. Finite element modeling and machine learning both provide valuable tools for fracture risk assessment. Future approaches should focus on including more loading-related aspects of fracture risk.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone strength; Computed tomography; Elderly; Finite element method; Fragility fractures; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36048316     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-022-00743-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.163


  29 in total

1.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stacey A Wainwright; Lynn M Marshall; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Dennis M Black; Teresa A Hillier; Marc C Hochberg; Molly T Vogt; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Subject-specific ex vivo simulations for hip fracture risk assessment in sideways falls.

Authors:  Ingmar Fleps; Anita Fung; Pierre Guy; Stephen J Ferguson; Benedikt Helgason; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Executive summary of the European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Patient-specific finite element estimated femur strength as a predictor of the risk of hip fracture: the effect of methodological determinants.

Authors:  M Qasim; G Farinella; J Zhang; X Li; L Yang; R Eastell; M Viceconti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Prediction of incident vertebral fractures in routine MDCT: Comparison of global texture features, 3D finite element parameters and volumetric BMD.

Authors:  Michael Dieckmeyer; Nithin Manohar Rayudu; Long Yu Yeung; Maximilian Löffler; Anjany Sekuboyina; Egon Burian; Nico Sollmann; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas Baum; Karupppasamy Subburaj
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  S C E Schuit; M van der Klift; A E A M Weel; C E D H de Laet; H Burger; E Seeman; A Hofman; A G Uitterlinden; J P T M van Leeuwen; H A P Pols
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Eugene V McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; L Joseph Melton; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Patterns of Load-to-Strength Ratios Along the Spine in a Population-Based Cohort to Evaluate the Contribution of Spinal Loading to Vertebral Fractures.

Authors:  Hossein Mokhtarzadeh; Dennis E Anderson; Brett T Allaire; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.