Ian E Krop1, Ingrid A Mayer2, Vinod Ganju3, Maura Dickler4, Stephen Johnston5, Serafin Morales6, Denise A Yardley7, Bohuslav Melichar8, Andres Forero-Torres9, Soo Chin Lee10, Richard de Boer11, Katarina Petrakova12, Susanne Vallentin13, Edith A Perez14, Martine Piccart15, Matthew Ellis16, Eric Winer17, Steven Gendreau18, Mika Derynck18, Mark Lackner18, Gallia Levy18, Jiaheng Qiu18, Jing He18, Peter Schmid19. 1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: ian_krop@dfci.harvard.edu. 2. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 3. Peninsula Oncology Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 4. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. 6. Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain. 7. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA. 8. Palacky University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic. 9. University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA. 10. National University Hospital, Singapore. 11. Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia. 12. Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic. 13. Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 14. Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 15. Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 16. Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. 17. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 18. Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA. 19. Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is a promising approach to overcome resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Pictilisib is an oral inhibitor of multiple PI3K isoforms. The aim of this study is to establish if addition of pictilisib to fulvestrant can improve progression-free survival in oestrogen receptor-positive, endocrine-resistant breast cancer. METHODS: In this two-part, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, we recruited postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant or metastatic setting, from 123 medical centres across 21 countries. Part 1 included patients with or without PIK3CA mutations, whereas part 2 included only patients with PIK3CA mutations. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 in part 1 and 2:1 in part 2) via a computer-generated hierarchical randomisation algorithm to daily oral pictilisib (340 mg in part 1 and 260 mg in part 2) or placebo starting on day 15 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on day 1 and day 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of subsequent cycles in both groups. In part 1, we stratified patients by presence or absence of PIK3CA mutation, primary or secondary aromatase inhibitor resistance, and measurable or non-measurable disease. In part 2, we stratified patients by previous aromatase inhibitor treatmentfor advanced or metastatic disease or relapse during or within 6 months of an aromatase inhibitor treatment in the adjuvant setting and measurable or non-measurable disease. All patients and those administering treatment and assessing outcomes were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population for both parts 1 and 2 and also separately in patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumours in part 1. Tumour assessment (physical examination and imaging scans) was investigator-assessed and done at screening and after 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, and 32 weeks of treatment from day 1 of cycle 1 and every 12 weeks thereafter. We assessed safety in as-treated patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01437566. FINDINGS: In part 1, between Sept 27, 2011, and Jan 11, 2013, we randomly allocated 168 patients to the pictilisib (89 [53%]) or placebo (79 [47%]) group. In part 2, between March 18, 2013, and Jan 2, 2014, we randomly allocated 61 patients to the pictilisib (41 [67%]) or placebo (20 [33%]) group. In part 1, we found no difference in median progression-free survival between the pictilisib (6·6 months [95% CI 3·9-9·8]) and placebo (5·1 months [3·6-7·3]) group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·74 [95% CI 0·52-1·06]; p=0·096). We also found no difference when patients were analysed according to presence (pictilisib 6·5 months [95% CI 3·7-9·8] vs placebo 5·1 months [2·6-10·4]; HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·42-1·28]; p=0·268) or absence (5·8 months [3·6-11·1] vs 3·6 months [2·8-7·3]; HR 0·72 [0·42-1·23]; p=0·23) of PIK3CA mutation. In part 2, we also found no difference in progression-free survival between groups (5·4 months [95% CI 3·8-8·3] vs 10·0 months [3·6-13·0]; HR 1·07 [95% CI 0·53-2·18]; p=0·84). In part 1, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 54 (61%) of 89 patients in the pictilisib group and 22 (28%) of 79 in the placebo group. 19 serious adverse events related to pictilisib treatment were reported in 14 (16%) of 89 patients. Only one (1%) of 79 patients reported treatment-related serious adverse events in the placebo group. In part 2, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 15 (36%) of 42 patients in the pictilisib group and seven (37%) of 19 patients in the placebo group. Four serious adverse events related to pictilisib treatment were reported in two (5%) of 42 patients. One treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in one (5%) of 19 patients in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Although addition of pictilisib to fulvestrant did not significantly improve progression-free survival, dosing of pictilisib was limited by toxicity, potentially limiting its efficacy. For future assessment of PI3K inhibition as an approach to overcome resistance to hormonal therapy, inhibitors with greater selectivity than that of pictilisib might be needed to improve tolerability and potentially increase efficacy. No further investigation of pictilisib in this setting is ongoing. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is a promising approach to overcome resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Pictilisib is an oral inhibitor of multiple PI3K isoforms. The aim of this study is to establish if addition of pictilisib to fulvestrant can improve progression-free survival in oestrogen receptor-positive, endocrine-resistant breast cancer. METHODS: In this two-part, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, we recruited postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant or metastatic setting, from 123 medical centres across 21 countries. Part 1 included patients with or without PIK3CA mutations, whereas part 2 included only patients with PIK3CA mutations. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 in part 1 and 2:1 in part 2) via a computer-generated hierarchical randomisation algorithm to daily oral pictilisib (340 mg in part 1 and 260 mg in part 2) or placebo starting on day 15 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on day 1 and day 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of subsequent cycles in both groups. In part 1, we stratified patients by presence or absence of PIK3CA mutation, primary or secondary aromatase inhibitor resistance, and measurable or non-measurable disease. In part 2, we stratified patients by previous aromatase inhibitor treatment for advanced or metastatic disease or relapse during or within 6 months of an aromatase inhibitor treatment in the adjuvant setting and measurable or non-measurable disease. All patients and those administering treatment and assessing outcomes were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population for both parts 1 and 2 and also separately in patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumours in part 1. Tumour assessment (physical examination and imaging scans) was investigator-assessed and done at screening and after 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, and 32 weeks of treatment from day 1 of cycle 1 and every 12 weeks thereafter. We assessed safety in as-treated patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01437566. FINDINGS: In part 1, between Sept 27, 2011, and Jan 11, 2013, we randomly allocated 168 patients to the pictilisib (89 [53%]) or placebo (79 [47%]) group. In part 2, between March 18, 2013, and Jan 2, 2014, we randomly allocated 61 patients to the pictilisib (41 [67%]) or placebo (20 [33%]) group. In part 1, we found no difference in median progression-free survival between the pictilisib (6·6 months [95% CI 3·9-9·8]) and placebo (5·1 months [3·6-7·3]) group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·74 [95% CI 0·52-1·06]; p=0·096). We also found no difference when patients were analysed according to presence (pictilisib 6·5 months [95% CI 3·7-9·8] vs placebo 5·1 months [2·6-10·4]; HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·42-1·28]; p=0·268) or absence (5·8 months [3·6-11·1] vs 3·6 months [2·8-7·3]; HR 0·72 [0·42-1·23]; p=0·23) of PIK3CA mutation. In part 2, we also found no difference in progression-free survival between groups (5·4 months [95% CI 3·8-8·3] vs 10·0 months [3·6-13·0]; HR 1·07 [95% CI 0·53-2·18]; p=0·84). In part 1, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 54 (61%) of 89 patients in the pictilisib group and 22 (28%) of 79 in the placebo group. 19 serious adverse events related to pictilisib treatment were reported in 14 (16%) of 89 patients. Only one (1%) of 79 patients reported treatment-related serious adverse events in the placebo group. In part 2, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 15 (36%) of 42 patients in the pictilisib group and seven (37%) of 19 patients in the placebo group. Four serious adverse events related to pictilisib treatment were reported in two (5%) of 42 patients. One treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in one (5%) of 19 patients in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Although addition of pictilisib to fulvestrant did not significantly improve progression-free survival, dosing of pictilisib was limited by toxicity, potentially limiting its efficacy. For future assessment of PI3K inhibition as an approach to overcome resistance to hormonal therapy, inhibitors with greater selectivity than that of pictilisib might be needed to improve tolerability and potentially increase efficacy. No further investigation of pictilisib in this setting is ongoing. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Authors: José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Todd W Miller; Bryan T Hennessy; Ana M González-Angulo; Emily M Fox; Gordon B Mills; Heidi Chen; Catherine Higham; Carlos García-Echeverría; Yu Shyr; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Sherene Loi; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Samira Majjaj; Francoise Lallemand; Virginie Durbecq; Denis Larsimont; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Lajos Pusztai; W Fraser Symmans; Alberto Bardelli; Paul Ellis; Andrew N J Tutt; Cheryl E Gillett; Bryan T Hennessy; Gordon B Mills; Wayne A Phillips; Martine J Piccart; Terence P Speed; Grant A McArthur; Christos Sotiriou Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Piccart; G N Hortobagyi; M Campone; K I Pritchard; F Lebrun; Y Ito; S Noguchi; A Perez; H S Rugo; I Deleu; H A Burris; L Provencher; P Neven; M Gnant; M Shtivelband; C Wu; J Fan; W Feng; T Taran; J Baselga Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: José Baselga; Vladimir Semiglazov; Peter van Dam; Alexey Manikhas; Meritxell Bellet; José Mayordomo; Mario Campone; Ernst Kubista; Richard Greil; Giulia Bianchi; Jutta Steinseifer; Betty Molloy; Erika Tokaji; Humphrey Gardner; Penny Phillips; Michael Stumm; Heidi A Lane; J Michael Dixon; Walter Jonat; Hope S Rugo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vandana G Abramson; M Cooper Lloyd; Tarah Ballinger; Melinda E Sanders; Liping Du; Darson Lai; Zengliu Su; Ingrid Mayer; Mia Levy; Delecia R LaFrance; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones; Yu Shyr; Kimberly B Dahlman; William Pao; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kevin Kalinsky; Lindsay M Jacks; Adriana Heguy; Sujata Patil; Marija Drobnjak; Umeshkumar K Bhanot; Cyrus V Hedvat; Tiffany A Traina; David Solit; William Gerald; Mary Ellen Moynahan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Debashis Sarker; Joo Ern Ang; Richard Baird; Rebecca Kristeleit; Krunal Shah; Victor Moreno; Paul A Clarke; Florence I Raynaud; Gallia Levy; Joseph A Ware; Kathryn Mazina; Ray Lin; Jenny Wu; Jill Fredrickson; Jill M Spoerke; Mark R Lackner; Yibing Yan; Lori S Friedman; Stan B Kaye; Mika K Derynck; Paul Workman; Johann S de Bono Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sherene Loi; Stefan Michiels; Jose Baselga; John M S Bartlett; Sandeep K Singhal; Vicky S Sabine; Andrew H Sims; Tarek Sahmoud; J Michael Dixon; Martine J Piccart; Christos Sotiriou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: K Kalinsky; J A Sparano; X Zhong; E Andreopoulou; B Taback; L Wiechmann; S M Feldman; P Ananthakrishnan; A Ahmad; S Cremers; A N Sireci; J R Cross; D K Marks; P Mundi; E Connolly; K D Crew; M A Maurer; H Hibshoosh; S Lee; D L Hershman Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Maura N Dickler; Cristina Saura; Donald A Richards; Ian E Krop; Andrés Cervantes; Philippe L Bedard; Manish R Patel; Lajos Pusztai; Mafalda Oliveira; Alison K Cardenas; Na Cui; Timothy R Wilson; Thomas J Stout; Michael C Wei; Jerry Y Hsu; José Baselga Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Shanhang Jia; Mark T Miedel; Marilyn Ngo; Ryan Hessenius; Ning Chen; Peilu Wang; Amir Bahreini; Zheqi Li; Zhijie Ding; Tong Ying Shun; Daniel M Zuckerman; D Lansing Taylor; Shannon L Puhalla; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich; Andrew M Stern Journal: Oncology Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Shu-Xiong Zeng; Yanjun Zhu; Ai-Hong Ma; Weimin Yu; Hongyong Zhang; Tzu-Yin Lin; Wei Shi; Clifford G Tepper; Paul T Henderson; Susan Airhart; Jian-Ming Guo; Chuan-Liang Xu; Ralph W deVere White; Chong-Xian Pan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wei Yang; Sarah R Hosford; Nicole A Traphagen; Kevin Shee; Eugene Demidenko; Stephanie Liu; Todd W Miller Journal: FASEB J Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Cynthia X Ma; Feng Gao; Jingqin Luo; Donald W Northfelt; Matthew Goetz; Andres Forero; Jeremy Hoog; Michael Naughton; Foluso Ademuyiwa; Rama Suresh; Karen S Anderson; Julie Margenthaler; Rebecca Aft; Timothy Hobday; Timothy Moynihan; William Gillanders; Amy Cyr; Timothy J Eberlein; Tina Hieken; Helen Krontiras; Zhanfang Guo; Michelle V Lee; Nicholas C Spies; Zachary L Skidmore; Obi L Griffith; Malachi Griffith; Shana Thomas; Caroline Bumb; Kiran Vij; Cynthia Huang Bartlett; Maria Koehler; Hussam Al-Kateb; Souzan Sanati; Matthew J Ellis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Golara Golbaghi; Irène Pitard; Matthieu Lucas; Mohammad Mehdi Haghdoost; Yossef López de Los Santos; Nicolas Doucet; Shunmoogum A Patten; J Thomas Sanderson; Annie Castonguay Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 6.514