Joshua Millstein1, Gary K Chen1, Carrie V Breton1. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: The challenges of successfully applying causal inference methods include: (i) satisfying underlying assumptions, (ii) limitations in data/models accommodated by the software and (iii) low power of common multiple testing approaches. RESULTS: The causal inference test (CIT) is based on hypothesis testing rather than estimation, allowing the testable assumptions to be evaluated in the determination of statistical significance. A user-friendly software package provides P-values and optionally permutation-based FDR estimates (q-values) for potential mediators. It can handle single and multiple binary and continuous instrumental variables, binary or continuous outcome variables and adjustment covariates. Also, the permutation-based FDR option provides a non-parametric implementation. CONCLUSION: Simulation studies demonstrate the validity of the cit package and show a substantial advantage of permutation-based FDR over other common multiple testing strategies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The cit open-source R package is freely available from the CRAN website (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cit/index.html) with embedded C ++ code that utilizes the GNU Scientific Library, also freely available (http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/). CONTACT: joshua.millstein@usc.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: The challenges of successfully applying causal inference methods include: (i) satisfying underlying assumptions, (ii) limitations in data/models accommodated by the software and (iii) low power of common multiple testing approaches. RESULTS: The causal inference test (CIT) is based on hypothesis testing rather than estimation, allowing the testable assumptions to be evaluated in the determination of statistical significance. A user-friendly software package provides P-values and optionally permutation-based FDR estimates (q-values) for potential mediators. It can handle single and multiple binary and continuous instrumental variables, binary or continuous outcome variables and adjustment covariates. Also, the permutation-based FDR option provides a non-parametric implementation. CONCLUSION: Simulation studies demonstrate the validity of the cit package and show a substantial advantage of permutation-based FDR over other common multiple testing strategies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The cit open-source R package is freely available from the CRAN website (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cit/index.html) with embedded C ++ code that utilizes the GNU Scientific Library, also freely available (http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/). CONTACT: joshua.millstein@usc.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Joshua Millstein; Christopher J Winrow; Andrew Kasarskis; Joseph R Owens; Lili Zhou; Keith C Summa; Karrie Fitzpatrick; Bin Zhang; Martha H Vitaterna; Eric E Schadt; John J Renger; Fred W Turek Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Yunzhao Tang; Annika S Axelsson; Peter Spégel; Lotta E Andersson; Hindrik Mulder; Leif C Groop; Erik Renström; Anders H Rosengren Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Xiumei Hong; Ke Hao; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Kasper D Hansen; Hui-Ju Tsai; Xin Liu; Xin Xu; Timothy A Thornton; Deanna Caruso; Corinne A Keet; Yifei Sun; Guoying Wang; Wei Luo; Rajesh Kumar; Ramsay Fuleihan; Anne Marie Singh; Jennifer S Kim; Rachel E Story; Ruchi S Gupta; Peisong Gao; Zhu Chen; Sheila O Walker; Tami R Bartell; Terri H Beaty; M Daniele Fallin; Robert Schleimer; Patrick G Holt; Kari Christine Nadeau; Robert A Wood; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Daniel E Weeks; Xiaobin Wang Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Yun Liu; Martin J Aryee; Leonid Padyukov; M Daniele Fallin; Espen Hesselberg; Arni Runarsson; Lovisa Reinius; Nathalie Acevedo; Margaret Taub; Marcus Ronninger; Klementy Shchetynsky; Annika Scheynius; Juha Kere; Lars Alfredsson; Lars Klareskog; Tomas J Ekström; Andrew P Feinberg Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-01-20 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Wei Yuan; Yudong Xia; Christopher G Bell; Idil Yet; Teresa Ferreira; Kirsten J Ward; Fei Gao; A Katrina Loomis; Craig L Hyde; Honglong Wu; Hanlin Lu; Yuan Liu; Kerrin S Small; Ana Viñuela; Andrew P Morris; María Berdasco; Manel Esteller; M Julia Brosnan; Panos Deloukas; Mark I McCarthy; Sally L John; Jordana T Bell; Jun Wang; Tim D Spector Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Chen Yao; Roby Joehanes; Andrew D Johnson; Tianxiao Huan; Chunyu Liu; Jane E Freedman; Peter J Munson; David E Hill; Marc Vidal; Daniel Levy Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Neeraj K Sharma; Mary E Comeau; Dennis Montoya; Matteo Pellegrini; Timothy D Howard; Carl D Langefeld; Swapan K Das Journal: Diabetes Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Vidya Chidambaran; Xue Zhang; Valentina Pilipenko; Xiaoting Chen; Benjamin Wronowski; Kristie Geisler; Lisa J Martin; Artem Barski; Matthew T Weirauch; Hong Ji Journal: Epigenomics Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 4.778
Authors: Parul H Kothari; Weiliang Qiu; Damien C Croteau-Chonka; Fernando D Martinez; Andrew H Liu; Robert F Lemanske; Carole Ober; Jerry A Krishnan; Dan L Nicolae; Kathleen C Barnes; Stephanie J London; Albino Barraza-Villarreal; Steven R White; Edward T Naureckas; Joshua Millstein; W James Gauderman; Frank D Gilliland; Vincent J Carey; Scott T Weiss; Benjamin A Raby Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 10.793