Literature DB >> 27147333

Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation.

Gregory M Sturgeon1, Nooshin Kiarashi2, Joseph Y Lo3, E Samei4, W P Segars5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors are developing a series of computational breast phantoms based on breast CT data for imaging research. In this work, the authors develop a program that will allow a user to alter the phantoms to simulate the effect of gravity and compression of the breast (craniocaudal or mediolateral oblique) making the phantoms applicable to multimodality imaging.
METHODS: This application utilizes a template finite-element (FE) breast model that can be applied to their presegmented voxelized breast phantoms. The FE model is automatically fit to the geometry of a given breast phantom, and the material properties of each element are set based on the segmented voxels contained within the element. The loading and boundary conditions, which include gravity, are then assigned based on a user-defined position and compression. The effect of applying these loads to the breast is computed using a multistage contact analysis in FEBio, a freely available and well-validated FE software package specifically designed for biomedical applications. The resulting deformation of the breast is then applied to a boundary mesh representation of the phantom that can be used for simulating medical images. An efficient script performs the above actions seamlessly. The user only needs to specify which voxelized breast phantom to use, the compressed thickness, and orientation of the breast.
RESULTS: The authors utilized their FE application to simulate compressed states of the breast indicative of mammography and tomosynthesis. Gravity and compression were simulated on example phantoms and used to generate mammograms in the craniocaudal or mediolateral oblique views. The simulated mammograms show a high degree of realism illustrating the utility of the FE method in simulating imaging data of repositioned and compressed breasts.
CONCLUSIONS: The breast phantoms and the compression software can become a useful resource to the breast imaging research community. These phantoms can then be used to evaluate and compare imaging modalities that involve different positioning and compression of the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27147333      PMCID: PMC4826386          DOI: 10.1118/1.4945275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  An analysis of the mechanical parameters used for finite element compression of a high-resolution 3D breast phantom.

Authors:  Christina M L Hsu; Mark L Palmeri; W Paul Segars; Alexander I Veress; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom.

Authors:  Beverly A Lau; Ingrid Reiser; Robert M Nishikawa; Predrag R Bakic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A finite element model to accurately predict real deformations of the breast.

Authors:  A Pérez del Palomar; B Calvo; J Herrero; J López; M Doblaré
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.

Authors:  Christina M Li; W Paul Segars; Georgia D Tourassi; John M Boone; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm.

Authors:  Predrag R Bakic; Cuiping Zhang; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.

Authors:  T Hopp; M Dietzel; P A Baltzer; P Kreisel; W A Kaiser; H Gemmeke; N V Ruiter
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Generation of a suite of 3D computer-generated breast phantoms from a limited set of human subject data.

Authors:  Christina M L Hsu; Mark L Palmeri; W Paul Segars; Alexander I Veress; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Large breast compressions: observations and evaluation of simulations.

Authors:  Christine Tanner; Mark White; Salvatore Guarino; Margaret A Hall-Craggs; Michael Douek; David J Hawkes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.

Authors:  J E de Groot; M J M Broeders; W Branderhorst; G J den Heeten; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Computational simulation of breast compression based on segmented breast and fibroglandular tissues on magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Tzu-Ching Shih; Jeon-Hor Chen; Dongxu Liu; Ke Nie; Lizhi Sun; Muqing Lin; Daniel Chang; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  8 in total

1.  Impact of Using Uniform Attenuation Coefficients for Heterogeneously Dense Breasts in a Dedicated Breast PET/X-ray Scanner.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Joseph Y Lo; Gregory M Sturgeon; Chengeng Zeng; Robert L Harrison; Paul E Kinahan; William Paul Segars
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-29

2.  Impact of breast structure on lesion detection in breast tomosynthesis, a simulation study.

Authors:  Nooshin Kiarashi; Loren W Nolte; Joseph Y Lo; W Paul Segars; Sujata V Ghate; Justin B Solomon; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-09-13

3.  Virtual assessment of stereoscopic viewing of digital breast tomosynthesis projection images.

Authors:  Gezheng Wen; Ho-Chang Chang; Jacob Reinhold; Joseph Y Lo; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-17

4.  Finite element model of mechanical imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Rebecca Axelsson; Hanna Tomic; Sophia Zackrisson; Anders Tingberg; Hanna Isaksson; Predrag R Bakic; Magnus Dustler
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-23

5.  Anthropomorphic breast model repository for research and development of microwave breast imaging technologies.

Authors:  Muhammad Omer; Elise Fear
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.444

6.  Synthetic breast phantoms from patient based eigenbreasts.

Authors:  Gregory M Sturgeon; Subok Park; William Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A Regression Model for Predicting Shape Deformation after Breast Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Hooshiar Zolfagharnasab; Sílvia Bessa; Sara P Oliveira; Pedro Faria; João F Teixeira; Jaime S Cardoso; Hélder P Oliveira
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; William P Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui; Paul E Kinahan; Nick Bottenus; Alejandro F Frangi; Andrew Maidment; Joseph Lo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.